Jump to content

[Poll] Ecm: What Modification Would You Like To See?


42 replies to this topic

Poll: ECM: How to move forward (134 member(s) have cast votes)

Choose the one modification to ECM you would like implemented most?

  1. No modifications are needed for ECM (31 votes [8.36%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.36%

  2. ECM and EECM modes should be separated into two pieces of equipment (16 votes [4.31%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.31%

  3. LRMS should be allowed to achieve lock on to a target with direct LOS, but not share targeting information (53 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. SSRMs should act as dumb fire missles while under an ECM umbrella (44 votes [11.86%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.86%

  5. 200m range the enemy radar is effective at against ECM should be increased (20 votes [5.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.39%

  6. 180m umbrella range of the ECM should be decreased (13 votes [3.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.50%

  7. ECM's ability to cut off information sharing on enemy mechs should be removed (8 votes [2.16%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.16%

  8. ECM should not disrupt the ability to target, just the ability to share infomation (31 votes [8.36%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.36%

  9. More mechs should be allowed to equip ECM (16 votes [4.31%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.31%

  10. Only light mechs should be able to equip ECM (11 votes [2.96%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.96%

  11. Only medium and light mechs should be able to equip ECM (5 votes [1.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.35%

  12. Assault mechs should not be allowed to equip ECM (10 votes [2.70%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.70%

  13. D-DC should not have ECM, but a different assault mech should be able to equip ECM (4 votes [1.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.08%

  14. D-DC should not have ECM, but a heavy mech should be able to equip ECM (3 votes [0.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.81%

  15. There should be no ECM umbrella. ECM should only hide the mech equipping it (24 votes [6.47%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.47%

  16. Display enemy and friendly umbrella radius on the minimap (16 votes [4.31%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.31%

  17. Give BAP the ability to reduce the ranges on ECM (39 votes [10.51%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.51%

  18. Allow all raven varients access to ECM (23 votes [6.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.20%

  19. ECMs should not stcack, one ECCM counters all ECMs in it's range (4 votes [1.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.08%

  20. Choice made from second list (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

ECM Modifications list 2

  1. Choice made from fist list (6 votes [66.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 66.67%

  2. ECM should weigh more tons (2 votes [22.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.22%

  3. ECM should require more crit slots (1 votes [11.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.11%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#41 Dracol

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Steadfast
  • The Steadfast
  • 2,539 posts
  • LocationSW Florida

Posted 09 December 2012 - 11:17 AM

View PostKrasnovian, on 09 December 2012 - 09:57 AM, said:

AMS should be returned to only specific chassis and tag should not put an icon visible to friendly mechs

Although I did put one option that is for BAP and not ECM, other modification suggestions concerning other equipment is beyond the scope of this poll.

#42 General Taskeen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,737 posts
  • LocationCircinus

Posted 09 December 2012 - 11:32 AM

Please add "ECM only increases time to sensor detection and lock" option in poll.

#43 Thomas Covenant

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,186 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • LocationOn an adventure.

Posted 09 December 2012 - 11:34 AM

I see this poll serves the same function as this one. So I will close mine.
Maybe we can merge the two?

Posted Image

Also, I was thinking about going over 20 items, it could go like:

...
item #17
item #18
item #19
item #20 none from this list

ECM Change list #2
...
item #20 none from this list

Edited by Thomas Covenant, 09 December 2012 - 01:15 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users