15 replies to this topic

[IKEAhardWood]

the third round of polls for this project: http://mwomercs.com/...h/#entry1471813

Suggestions regarding the poll of next week can be left here: http://mwomercs.com/...ven-mech-topic/

Edited by IKEAhardWood, 07 December 2012 - 03:04 AM.

[p4r4g0n]

I apologize but I don't understand what this poll is about. Could you provide links to earlier polls where the subject matter has been discussed or clarify what this poll is about?

Thanks in advance

[Redshift2k5]

He is trying to create a new mech, design "by committee" of the forum users.

[p4r4g0n]

Ahhhh ... so we'll end up with an elephant camel?

Edit: Wrong maxim

Edited by p4r4g0n, 07 December 2012 - 04:29 AM.

[Redshift2k5]

Yes.

[IKEAhardWood]

p4r4g0n, on 07 December 2012 - 03:14 AM, said:

I apologize but I don't understand what this poll is about. Could you provide links to earlier polls where the subject matter has been discussed or clarify what this poll is about?

Thanks in advance

the links/results are there if you know how to read

Edited by IKEAhardWood, 07 December 2012 - 09:42 AM.

[p4r4g0n]

Dude, you stealth edited it to include the links

Weren't there when I posted and don't recall ever seeing any of your previous threads probably because threads get buried so quickly on the forum.

[PhigNewtenz]

I don't understand the design of this poll. Are you going to look at the names of every respondent and try to make the hundreds of matches between their role and signature votes? If all you do is look at the results graph, there's no way to meaningfully determine roll-signature pairings, so you're effectively obscuring everyone's votes.

[Joseph Mallan]

Redshift2k5, on 07 December 2012 - 04:22 AM, said:

He is trying to create a new mech, design "by committee" of the forum users.

This has already been done. We got the Gunslinger

[IKEAhardWood]

PhigNewtenz, on 07 December 2012 - 10:03 AM, said:

I don't understand the design of this poll. Are you going to look at the names of every respondent and try to make the hundreds of matches between their role and signature votes? If all you do is look at the results graph, there's no way to meaningfully determine roll-signature pairings, so you're effectively obscuring everyone's votes.

IT is simple, the #1 role and #1 signature gets thrown in. simple, if you dont understand that much, i wount lose my sleep over it.

[IKEAhardWood]

p4r4g0n, on 07 December 2012 - 09:47 AM, said:

Dude, you stealth edited it to include the links

Weren't there when I posted and don't recall ever seeing any of your previous threads probably because threads get buried so quickly on the forum.

Ehem dont tell me it is raining when your trying to **** in my eye: Timestamp on edit: 01:04PM my time, timestamp on your first post 01:14PM sooo, they had been there for 10 minutes before anyone else posted. unless you are incredibly slow at typing and do it 18 characters a minute.

[Orzorn]

I voted PPC with high powered engine. I want a medium mech that tears *** through the landscape while blasting everything in its path with PPCs and large pulse lasers.

[IKEAhardWood]

Orzorn, on 07 December 2012 - 02:35 PM, said:

I voted PPC with high powered engine. I want a medium mech that tears *** through the landscape while blasting everything in its path with PPCs and large pulse lasers.

IT will be a heavy mech, you came too late for the weight class/tonnage and limb/arm type and head/torso type votes so far the winning choices from the first 2 polls are:
70 ton heavy:
Chicken legs with fixed side plates/hardpoints.
with stealth fighter cockpit and a stealth diamond torso.

[p4r4g0n]

IKEAhardWood, on 07 December 2012 - 02:20 PM, said:

Ehem dont tell me it is raining when your trying to **** in my eye: Timestamp on edit: 01:04PM my time, timestamp on your first post 01:14PM sooo, they had been there for 10 minutes before anyone else posted. unless you are incredibly slow at typing and do it 18 characters a minute.

You're assuming I open threads one at a time but whatever

[Solis Obscuri]

I voted for an energy weapons knife-fighter whose signature armament is LRMs.

Because I could.

[IKEAhardWood]

Solis Obscuri, on 07 December 2012 - 03:25 PM, said:

I voted for an energy weapons knife-fighter whose signature armament is LRMs.

Because I could.

i dont see why not we have a EW light knife fighter already with 2 missile hardpoints in the jenners and a catapult with 4E HP's and 2 missile bays