

Artemis Needs Buff
#21
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:25 AM
#22
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:26 AM

#23
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:26 AM
#24
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:27 AM
#25
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:31 AM
I mean if youre devoting like 3-6 tons and millions of c-bills to Artemis and it just gets countered by 1.5 tons of ECM that costs less than 500,000 cbils, then why even take Artemis on SRMs anymore?
Obviously something isn't quite balanced there.
Edited by Khobai, 10 December 2012 - 06:36 AM.
#26
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:31 AM
As for the original post - maybe just a touch. Just a little bit.
#27
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:32 AM
Jabilac, on 10 December 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:
Yeah I found that they are still too spread out at that range to make a huge difference. With Artemis hit with 4-5 missiles on 3 body parts. Without hit 3-4 missiles on 3 body parts. For that reason I use my MLAS and try to close for SRM6
#28
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:34 AM
MADSix, on 10 December 2012 - 06:26 AM, said:
I didn't think ECM had any effect on my SRM missle grouping with Artemis. I could almost sware that they are just doing their normal thing but in all hoensty I don't pay heavy attention to it, I trust it. Trusting it got me a 180 meter one shot on a commando. Pure luck but they must haeve grouped well whilst I was in the bubble...
Jack Corvus, on 10 December 2012 - 06:31 AM, said:
As for the original post - maybe just a touch. Just a little bit.
Indeed, and agreed. Not much - we don't want a shotgun launcher - just a tad tighter grouping.
#29
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:37 AM
#30
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:39 AM
EnigmaNL, on 10 December 2012 - 06:37 AM, said:
Well Artemis mainly helps with grouping but does give a better lock on for LRM (I'm not sure what they do exactly on LRM).
Perhaps if they help grouping of SRM and not so much the LRM? Do you use the SRM at all?
#31
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:40 AM
just too much working against it. i would use it on some builds if it weren't for the reload cost
#32
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:46 AM
Jason1138, on 10 December 2012 - 06:40 AM, said:
just too much working against it. i would use it on some builds if it weren't for the reload cost
But ECMs don't interupt SRMs or Artemis?
If they do, that's news to me...
Edited by Rex Budman, 10 December 2012 - 06:47 AM.
#33
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:48 AM
#34
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:50 AM
#35
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:51 AM
#36
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:55 AM
all i said was that the cost + the limitations + further limitations from ecm make it not worth mounting. yes, you CAN mount it anyway and get some kills. but more kills than you would have gotten with other things using that weight? i doubt it
#37
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:57 AM
#38
Posted 10 December 2012 - 07:01 AM
#39
Posted 10 December 2012 - 07:05 AM
Quote
Missiles have nothing to do with the topic. The topic is about Artemis. Right now Artemis is too easily countered by ECM to the point where its not even worth using on missile boats, because even if you TAG your target to get past the ECM, the Artemis still doesnt work.
So the solution is pretty simple... ECM should only partially negate the benefits of Artemis. That way, ECM would still be useful against Artemis, and having Artemis would still more useful than not having Artemis. It's a decent compromise that more or less stays true to tabletop.
Edited by Khobai, 10 December 2012 - 07:11 AM.
#40
Posted 10 December 2012 - 07:09 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users