Dec 13Th Incident - Official Response
#221
Posted 14 December 2012 - 04:22 PM
#222
Posted 14 December 2012 - 04:28 PM
Someone cited Blizzard and Sony earlier in the thread as people who've also been hacked. The implication being that we should expect it. The trouble with those analogies is that Sony were utterly inept at securing their back end and paid a very high price. Blizzard - yeah they got done over but immediately put their PR setup into full swing to inform and educate their users about the issue.
PGI have managed to achieve none of the latter and all of the former. Both represent a poor show indeed. **** does happen - but MTFU and put it as right as you can. Whilst you're at it - unban my forum account and if you want a different opinion of yourselves portrayed in public - raise your bar far higher as you go about things.
Edited by Inertiaman01, 14 December 2012 - 04:31 PM.
#223
Posted 14 December 2012 - 05:35 PM
What some are responding to is "big deal it's just spam email" but it isn't just spam email. The forums and site have been compromised and we have a statement saying no email addresses were taken when it's clearly not true. That leads me to wonder just what else has gone on that I don't know about. I've seen a few saying that people like myself must have something to hide if we're that worried which is ridiculous. If you blindly believe what you're told when you have evidence to the contrary then your opinion means nothing to me.
I would very much like to see a follow up response from PGI over this but I'm willing to give them time to do a proper investigation so they can give all the details they can without risking more misinformation.
#224
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:10 PM
#225
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:13 PM
oh ya. FF is still reporting mwomercs.com as a hostile website.
#226
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:13 PM
Inertiaman01, on 14 December 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
Someone cited Blizzard and Sony earlier in the thread as people who've also been hacked. The implication being that we should expect it. The trouble with those analogies is that Sony were utterly inept at securing their back end and paid a very high price. Blizzard - yeah they got done over but immediately put their PR setup into full swing to inform and educate their users about the issue.
PGI have managed to achieve none of the latter and all of the former. Both represent a poor show indeed. **** does happen - but MTFU and put it as right as you can. Whilst you're at it - unban my forum account and if you want a different opinion of yourselves portrayed in public - raise your bar far higher as you go about things.
Not true. While Blizzard didn't wait as long as Sony did to inform people, they didn't do it immediately.
#227
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:20 PM
Mims, on 14 December 2012 - 04:22 PM, said:
same here and check with google . so you code is still not fixed have to chg password again. Yes i am getting the email so fix your MO FO site.
Edited by warp103, 14 December 2012 - 07:20 PM.
#228
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:47 PM
(Probably some pissant pissed off about their account getting banned for TK'ing...)
#229
Posted 14 December 2012 - 09:32 PM
Chronojam, on 13 December 2012 - 09:26 PM, said:
You can find the November 13 blog post at the IPS dev site detailing a few fixes that can minimize the impact of similar intrusions if they should occur again. It is currently December 13.
However trying to calm the average user, they have no idea. The best safety any user can be is still on their end. Never use forum names as passwords. Don't use forum names/logins the same as your email. Use different passwords, etc. These are just the basics that help. Obviously don't use simple dictionary words, use capitalized letters, lowercase and numbers using at least a 8 digit password. Those things save a lot of headaches and stop issues before they happen. Obviously never install anything you don't know what it is or click strange links.
These types of injections though happen. The data itself though is usually safe from them. These things are usually redirects that try to get people to install things and that is how they get infected.
Mims, on 14 December 2012 - 04:22 PM, said:
Inertiaman01, on 14 December 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
#230
Posted 14 December 2012 - 09:55 PM
here -> http://forums.bit-te...d.php?p=3238217
Originally Posted by Windows 8 Is Fail - balmer@microsoft.com
Windows 8 is a lousy Operating System. Its supposed improved performance and claims of improved battery life are exaggerrated, Windows Store is a shameless attempt to pump people for money, and the user interface changes decrease productivity. It is a poor product created for the sake of getting money from your pockets into theirs while offering you as little value as possible. Security is not much different - most exploits and malware that work for earlier Windows versions will still work on Windows 8. One thing that might not work well on it is you, because they switched the interface around so that you have new computer skills to learn. It doesn't really matter whether you want to buy it anyway, because sooner or later it will probably be forced on you by hardware manufacturers.
Windows 8 is a shameless marketing ploy, introduced just in time for the "holiday shopping season", which is another big scam. There is nothing "Holy" about it, because "Christmas" is a big lie.
Excerpts from h*tp://fin**********or.com/xmas.htm
"Xmas has absolutely nothing to do with God. It was originally called Yuletide, which is a pagan festival from the Babylonian Mystery religion of SUN worship. The Babylonians were merchants (they were the originators of the "Market-system" which is condemned by God) and they used Yuletide to sell their merchandise because, like today, it made them lots of money."
"SANTA CLAUS is an anagram for *****."
"The fact that the three kings came to pay homage, and brought gifts of great wealth, was used by ***** to give, to those who perverted the teaching, the idea to continue and even increase the sales of their merchandise (a great marketing-exercise for them). So the virgin-birth was hijacked and corrupted into a time to make lots of money, using the ultimate in "high-pressure sales techniques", which was to falsely use God's Son's name, in order to embarass people, who couldn't afford to buy gifts, to go into debt or steal in order to buy their merchandise. By doing this the rich merchants ruin the lives of the poor, driving them further into debt and poverty or crime, whilst making themselves richer and richer."
Do you want to give more of your hard-earned money to an opulent mega-corporation? Do you want to serve *****? Don't fall for the cheap con-artist tricks of the Windows peddlers.
#231
Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:22 PM
#232
Posted 15 December 2012 - 01:17 AM
#233
Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:16 AM
Lonestar1771, on 14 December 2012 - 11:22 PM, said:
MWO doesn't ask for any mobile or home phone number. I don't see how you're linking the two together when the only thing in common is that they both happened on the same day. The only way I could possibly see this making any sense is if your email address was your phone number and even then it'd be a guess that lots of numbers meant it was a phone number. Yes hold PGI accountable for things that have happened but your issue has nothing to do with it.
#234
Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:23 AM
#235
Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:47 AM
Dark Severance, on 14 December 2012 - 09:32 PM, said:
Er no. Most of the usual information is from me and other people with a clue. Being in possession of half a clue I'm not in any danger. My concern was for others with less awareness. I cannot see how you can take my opinion that there is a responsibility on the host of a service to dish out info of a security lapse that affects their customers, and not only tell me the stance is wrong but that I'm making it up. You're catagorically dismissing an entirely subjective opinion.
The email issue really isn't the problem, simply the symptom. The problem lies with anyone who didn't pay attention to browser warnings, or is using an older browser and now has malware on their PC. Please point out the information and fix regarding said malware in the OP or anywhere else in the official response.
Be useful or be quiet.
#236
Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:41 AM
#238
Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:54 AM
Inertiaman, on 15 December 2012 - 04:47 AM, said:
Almost every piece of malware or infected items can easily be searched for an answer to clean and stop. In the off chance that there is a particular nasty one that even effects their ability to search, almost everyone has another internet source (ie: ipad, phone, etc) that they can cleanly search for how to clean a system. They simply type in what the malware they have on their system or the symptoms and there are usually already tons of actual security websites that have the information that deal with this thing daily. No offfese to PGI but I wouldn't trust anyone whose doesn't deal with this on a regular basis telling me how to clean my system anyways. It just isn't there responsibility nor can they fully know with what or how someone got infected if they continued past the redirects.
98% of all malware can simply be purged by utilizing proper administration for Windows and seperate users. I actually have a seperate user for work and a seperate user that I use for gaming. On the off chance that it does get infected it is usually isolated only to that user. Simply removing that user, recreating it is enough. Or even restoring to a previous saved point, depending on the infection.
JudgeDeathCZ, on 15 December 2012 - 08:13 AM, said:
deleted cookies 2 times
#239
Posted 15 December 2012 - 10:03 AM
Lon3Wo1f, on 15 December 2012 - 03:16 AM, said:
MWO doesn't ask for any mobile or home phone number. I don't see how you're linking the two together when the only thing in common is that they both happened on the same day. The only way I could possibly see this making any sense is if your email address was your phone number and even then it'd be a guess that lots of numbers meant it was a phone number. Yes hold PGI accountable for things that have happened but your issue has nothing to do with it.
I never blamed PGI and but it's not hard to get info off of someone's computer after it's compromised. If anything I was just giving a heads up to watch for weird things.
Edited by Lonestar1771, 15 December 2012 - 10:05 AM.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users