Jump to content

Game Runs Bad


47 replies to this topic

#21 Steel your Life

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 61 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 05:58 PM

View PostOne Medic Army, on 15 December 2012 - 05:45 PM, said:

Just because the first number is higher, doesn't make the card better is the takeaway from this.

Just because something's in the 6000 series doesn't mean it's better than everything in the 5000 series.

Do some research on your cards relative performance before you start complaining.

I'm using an i5 quad and a 460GTX, prior to that I was on a Q6600 quad and a 460GTx. Game ran, dipped as low as 20fps, and my settings were middling to high.


thats crap the recomended settings still say 5000 series the 6570 might be 10% worse 10% better whatever like that one guy said which i kinda doubt the diff is even that high. Point is the card is well within the recomended settings and my game skips so bad its uplayable to fight scout mechs close by me. Buildings aslo flicker so there is an obvious problem and/or the game developers simply bold faced lied about what the rec specs should be.

Edited by Steel your Life, 15 December 2012 - 05:59 PM.


#22 zverofaust

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,093 posts
  • LocationMontreal

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:05 PM

View PostOne Medic Army, on 15 December 2012 - 05:56 PM, said:

And yet you still play, one would thing someday you would just stop and leave...


You might thing so
But you'd be wronk

#23 One Medic Army

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,985 posts
  • LocationBay Area, California

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:06 PM

6570: 771 3dmark from http://www.videocard...et/gpu_list.php
5670: 1045 3dmark from same website.
So you're like 25% under.

View Postzverofaust, on 15 December 2012 - 06:05 PM, said:

You might thing so
But you'd be wronk

I AM NEVER WRONK!
I'm just wrong like everyone else at times.

Edited by One Medic Army, 15 December 2012 - 06:07 PM.


#24 Biglead

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,102 posts
  • LocationManassas, Va

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:07 PM

View PostSteel your Life, on 15 December 2012 - 05:58 PM, said:


thats crap the recomended settings still say 5000 series the 6570 might be 10% worse 10% better whatever like that one guy said which i kinda doubt the diff is even that high. Point is the card is well within the recomended settings and my game skips so bad its uplayable to fight scout mechs close by me. Buildings aslo flicker so there is an obvious problem and/or the game developers simply bold faced lied about what the rec specs should be.



OOOHHHHHH well that's different. There are guys on my lance with 30+ FPS in combat and lights still warp for them. I think what you're describing is the light mechs ability to take advantage of a poor netcode. No video card can help that.


You can cross check. If mediums/heavys and assaults skip then it's your card. If its just the lights...well then take a number and wait in line for retribution.

Edited by Biglead, 15 December 2012 - 06:09 PM.


#25 Odins Fist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,111 posts
  • LocationThe North

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:08 PM

View PostSteel your Life, on 15 December 2012 - 03:14 AM, said:

i have better than the recomended system requirments
i have a overclocked liquid cooled 4.0 ghz quad core and a radeon HD 6570

.
Dont take this wrong, but whoever sold you the radeon HD 6570 (probably a kid at Best Buy), needs to be fired..
.
Radeon HD 6570
Core Clock 650MHz <------ Bad
Stream Processors 480 Stream Processors <----- Not good
( Nvidia calls their Stream Processor count Cuda Cores. I think the number was estimated somewhere from 3 - 5 AMD Stream Processors = 1 nVidia Stream Processor/Cuda Core)

Memory
Effective Memory Clock 1333MHz
Memory Size 1GB
Memory Interface 128-bit <----- Not great
Memory Type DDR3 <------ Old standard
.
"ANYONE" that says the 6570 is a good choice is wrong, it's basically a slimline Video Card, it's not even externally powered by the PSU, it draws power from the PCI-e slot... It's not good.. "PERIOD"
.
Wow, 2007 called, they want their Video Card back... http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814102994
.
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814150580

Edited by Odins Fist, 15 December 2012 - 06:20 PM.


#26 zverofaust

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,093 posts
  • LocationMontreal

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:10 PM

Yeah I have a pretty crap rig i5 quadcore 8gb RAM with an HD 5770 -- but I can run this game smoothly on HIGH and excellently on MEDIUM (thats one thing PGI did ******* well, optimize this game, at least for midrange computers). The light teleporting thing is a net issue, but a weird one... it doesn't happen with all Light Mechs, and far as I could tell the one major offender I've seen in the past few days had an average ping.

#27 Elkarlo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 911 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:22 PM

@ OP

The whole HDX5xx Series of the Radeon ( No matter which Modell) are optimized for
Workstation/HTPC/Notebook Stuff.
They are realy capable within their Limits. But they have been designt to have Two Stream Processing Units
( Two Video Encoding coding Units) and to have a low Power Consumption.
This was for the 4500 5500 6500 and the 7500 .

That the Stream Processors have quite a Punch and enable for some Gaming of Games around 3-4 Games around make it a nice add on but was NEVER a requested Design Feature on them.

They need two Stream Processor Units so that they can Accelerate Flash Command together with Video Commands at once..
so that Youtube runs on the Graphikscard provided the Browser supports it. And they do very well. And they can run Unreal3 Engine Titels very smooth but they have not enough Punch for Crysis. There you have to cancel most of the Effects to have decent Framerate. ATM PGI don't have the Buttons installed in the Graphik Options. To do that you have to follow THIS Link, and there it is EXPLAINED how to do it, that MWO will WORK with YOUR Card.

http://mwomercs.com/...-end-computers/

You wanted help, here it is.

Edited by Elkarlo, 15 December 2012 - 06:23 PM.


#28 dario03

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander
  • 3,629 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:56 PM

Yeah sounds like you're seeing lag and netcode problems. Even if your ping is good you will see light mechs (or any mech going over ~84kph or has a really bad ping) jump around (high ping on your side will make it worse).
But your card is also right at the minimum system requirements since the min is a AMD 5600/5700 and the 6570 is usually around the 5670 in performance. I found that the game ran better on my AMD 4870 512MB by freeing up VRAM and to a lesser degree by turning off extra processes. So when I play I turn off all my other programs (even my web browser) and run a program called gamebooster which turns off background programs. But the biggest help came from setting my windows 7 theme to windows basic. Doing that and of course turning the game settings to low could help with your flickering building problem especially if you have the 512MB version of the 6570.

Edited by dario03, 15 December 2012 - 07:02 PM.


#29 TurinAlexander

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:25 PM

The HD 6570 is just not up to minimum requirements for the game. Go here to get a good idea of how the different video cards out there stack up to each other. http://www.tomshardw...iew,3107-7.html You'll see that the 6570 is far below the recommended 5700 series.

Edited by TurinAlexander, 15 December 2012 - 07:29 PM.


#30 xX_Nero_Xx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 649 posts
  • LocationDallas,Texas

Posted 15 December 2012 - 08:32 PM

my hd 5770 runs this great my issue now is they ahve push more tot he cpu and less fromt he gpu

#31 Alfred VonGunn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,772 posts
  • LocationPhoenix,AZ

Posted 15 December 2012 - 08:44 PM

View PostSteel your Life, on 15 December 2012 - 04:50 PM, said:

yea i get that the 6570 isnt the best card on the market and thats kinda my point in the post.... and yea i also am aware that going out and buying 2 of the 600 dollar top of the line cards and putting them in my machine will probly improve performance...

what i was kinda getting at in the post is for this game (not gaming in general) the "recomended requirements" are less than what i have. Last time i check when you play a game with above recomended requirements it shouldnt be so choppy that it looks like ur staring into a strobe light...

when scout mechs get close to me they litteraly look like they are teleporting around on my screen like Gandalf from LOTR.
I cant and wont believe this is the way the game is supposed to look with above recomended gear running it......



I';m running it on my older system with a iCore 920 from 5 years ago.. a newer MB a 7700 series card I paid $140 for a year a go.. with 24 GB of Ram.. I get playable FPS.. It does drop into the single digits in a real busy screen situation but normally high teens to mid 20s...

#32 iller

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 49 posts
  • LocationColo.

Posted 15 December 2012 - 08:52 PM

View PostElkarlo, on 15 December 2012 - 03:22 AM, said:

Your Grafikcard is too weak.

I usually balk at any response like this. I have a much weaker CPU than the OP but also a HD 6XXX series card...
http://www.videocard...=Radeon+HD+6790
...but apparently... they're not all created equal:
http://www.videocard...=Radeon+HD+6570

...I suspect the real problem here is the GB Bandwidth.
http://en.wikipedia...._6xxx.29_series
The OP's only cranks out 28.8

The recommended Specs (according to this) is a "HD 5870" = 153.6 bandwidth
http://www.videocard...=Radeon+HD+5870


Yeah I'd agree it's a little ridiculous that I get 30FPS smoothly on a 3ghz Dualcore in WinXP/DX-9 while the OP is stuttering but I guess Cryengine3 is just a lot more GPU intensive??

Edited by iller, 15 December 2012 - 09:21 PM.


#33 Harmatia

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 434 posts
  • LocationRed Deer, AB

Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:39 AM

I have a i7 930, XFX 6950 and 12gb of RAM. No performance issues, what-so-ever.

#34 Elkarlo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 911 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 16 December 2012 - 01:02 AM

View Postiller, on 15 December 2012 - 08:52 PM, said:

I usually balk at any response like this.

It is the Truth nothing else, and i even give him the Page were he gets advices to
deactivate the Particle Effects and so on, so MWO will work on his Card.

http://mwomercs.com/...-end-computers/

#35 Oderint dum Metuant

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,758 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 16 December 2012 - 01:04 AM

View PostRaidyr, on 15 December 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:

http://www.tomshardw...rks,2925-5.html</p>Crysis 2 benchmarks. The 6570 exceeds recommended specs for that game and MWO, and is in fact not AMD's answer to the 8800GTS, that's ridiculous, this card came out years after the 8800 series. OP should have no problem playing this game.</p>
You should really learn what your talking about as opposed to just spouting dribble a 6570 is a low end media card.An 8800GTS is nearly the equivalent of a GT 240 and the 240 is the card next to the 6570 on your graphs.Sure its fine playing at archaic resolutions like 1280*1024 at low settings with no AA, and even then its not going to produce fantastic results, because the card is not designed with high end gaming in mind...no where even close.People really need to learn that the first digit in GPU's is largely irrelevant as its just the series number.The middle two for AMD and last 2 for Nvidia denote its intention and performance.</p>

#36 Elkarlo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 911 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 16 December 2012 - 01:07 AM

The GTS 8800 has the G92b chip inside..
as the GTS250 does.

The GT240 does too but is the 9800GT, which means about 20% less Performance then the
"real thing" because some Shader units are deaktivated

The G92b Chip by Nvidia is build into Four Card Series:

8800Gts
9800GT/GTX
150 GTS
240/250GTS

And thats the reason the 8800gts is mentioned.

Edited by Elkarlo, 16 December 2012 - 01:17 AM.


#37 Oderint dum Metuant

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,758 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 16 December 2012 - 01:20 AM

View PostElkarlo, on 16 December 2012 - 01:07 AM, said:

The GTS 8800 has the G92b chip inside..
as the GTS250 does.

The GT240 does too but is the 9800GT, which means about 20% less Performance then the "real thing" because some Shader units are deaktivated

The G92b Chip by Nvidia is build into Four Card Series:

8800Gts
9800GT/GTX
150 GTS
240/250GTS

And thats the reason the 8800gts is mentioned.
There is about a 30% difference between the 8800GTS and GT 240As always its dependent on game.,,
http://www.hwcompare...e-gt-240-gddr5/

the 8800 is the better card no doubt, but its hard to find a graph that displays the 6570 vs 8800GTS

Edited by DV McKenna, 16 December 2012 - 01:24 AM.


#38 Elkarlo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 911 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 16 December 2012 - 01:29 AM

Don't have to tell me, got a Gainward 9800GT Goldensample.
The Goldensample says that Gainward builded with the GTX+ Chip inside....
But depending on the Drivers Nvidia supplys it is a GT or a GTX+ as sometimes
Nvidia says no you have now 7 Shade Units
and not 8 because your Card Firmware says its a GT not a GTX.
And you are not to overclock your Card anylonger... ( thanks to the Massiv Cooled Gainward provided
she mades 818mhz savely)

The Main Reason it is in the Shelf right now. I was frustrated by the Fact the Nvidia always toldme
"We got a new Card series out there, get a new one"

Two Times the Card had been nerfed by Nvidia and then later unlocked again..
everytime putting down at least 20% performance overall. And by Chance it always happened when a
New Series Hit the Market... They claimed it was a Mistake.

Edited by Elkarlo, 16 December 2012 - 01:30 AM.


#39 Rex Budman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 841 posts

Posted 16 December 2012 - 02:33 AM

Why dump on his GPU? The game is CPU heavy and it is not optimized, so his GPU would not be under such heavy load to even know whether or not it is worthy.

I have a HD6950 and I get 20fps in a battle and 35 on idle...

Edited by Rex Budman, 16 December 2012 - 02:34 AM.


#40 Dukarriope

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 923 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Locationa creative suite

Posted 16 December 2012 - 02:36 AM

Posted Image
How is this even possible.





9 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users