Jump to content

As7-K Should Have Ecm Not As7-D-Dc


35 replies to this topic

#21 SpiralRazor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 2,691 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 01:44 PM

I would have to agree...the K is supposed to be the advanced model, and the Draconis combine model can do something else with the command consoles

#22 Belorion

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 5,469 posts
  • LocationEast Coast

Posted 15 December 2012 - 01:50 PM

The D-DC is the one that comes with a command console which is closer to being information warfare than what the K comes with.

The D(C) will have it most likely. If they ever come out with that one.

#23 MrPenguin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 1,815 posts
  • LocationSudbury, Ontario

Posted 15 December 2012 - 01:53 PM

View PostBudor, on 15 December 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:

ECM should be on the COM-1B, RVN-4X, CDA 3C (3M is ok though), AS7-K for balancing reasons,

This is what a troll post looks like.

Edited by MrPenguin, 15 December 2012 - 01:53 PM.


#24 MadPanda

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 2,054 posts
  • LocationSearching for a game...

Posted 15 December 2012 - 01:57 PM

It wouldn't make sense to have it on the K. The K is already anti-lrm specialist with double AMS (let's pretend for a second AMS doesn't suck). Giving it also the ECM would pretty much nullify the specialty of the K which is double AMS. The K would then just be a one trick pony for the ECM, it's specialty would be gone. The DC is fine choice for the ECM. If you want to buff the K, then AMS should get a buff which would directly make K much better.

#25 TSB101

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 01:22 AM

View PostGhogiel, on 15 December 2012 - 12:50 PM, said:

I much prefer the ECM on my D-DC. I don't like the K.


Right, so does EVERYONE. That is a problem.

View PostMadPanda, on 15 December 2012 - 01:57 PM, said:

It wouldn't make sense to have it on the K. The K is already anti-lrm specialist with double AMS (let's pretend for a second AMS doesn't suck). Giving it also the ECM would pretty much nullify the specialty of the K which is double AMS. The K would then just be a one trick pony for the ECM, it's specialty would be gone. The DC is fine choice for the ECM. If you want to buff the K, then AMS should get a buff which would directly make K much better.


But why is the D-DC a "fine" choice for ECM? Because it was already the best Atlas? You suggest the K variant is the "anti-LRM" variant and in the same sentence concede that double AMS sucks. So I say again, why not give the K variant ECM?

Please, unless I have misunderstood you, your points were as follows:

- Don't give the K variant ECM because it is anti-LRM with dual AMS
- Dual AMS is near useless (Only thing we agree on)
- Therefor, the D-DC is a fine choice


Did I get that right?

Now you say the K with ECM will just be a "one trick pony". As opposed to what it is now, a "zero trick pony"? If you TRULY believe the K's role is anti-LRM (I would not pigeon-hole it into such a small niche) would ECM not make it actually perform this role effectively? You seem to think that since the D-DC is the best, it should have ECM and since the K is the worst it should not. Please, help me out here.

Look, the fact is the decision to grant the D-DC ECM means that, as a player trying to WIN, if I chose any variant of the Atlas that is NOT the D-DC, then I am leaving A LOT on the table. I feel that PGI should address this concern by removing ECM capability from the D-DC and giving it to the K.

I can honestly say Mechwarrior Online would be a BETTER game if this change was made. And as of yet, I have not seen a single argument that would lead me to ANY other conclusion.

*EDIT*

And I just wanted to say for the record:

In the ten days since I started this topic I only feel stronger about taking away ECM from the D-DC. And judging by the number of them I've seen stomping around the battlefield lately, it has come very apparent to a great many Mechwarriors just how much better it is than the other variants.

Also, I realize this is a bit of a late request but can this thread be moved into the Suggestions area? No idea why I made it in General Discussion. >.<

Edited by TSB101, 25 December 2012 - 01:50 AM.


#26 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 04:03 AM

It seems pointless to have an ECM mech that has 2 AMS slots.

Can't we buff it in some other way? How about an additional weapon slot somewhere, say a side torso energy slot or a head-mounted weapon? Or maybe raise its torso twist range?

#27 Ghogiel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • 6,852 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 04:09 AM

View PostTSB101, on 25 December 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:


Right, so does EVERYONE. That is a problem.

A problem for you maybe..

#28 xxx WreckinBallRaj xxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,852 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 04:29 AM

If they aren't going to properly balance the ECM and its impact on other variants that can't use it, then yes, putting it on the K variant would have made more sense. But as it stands now, the K is useless. Only the worst of newbs would take a second AMS+less weapons over an ECM.

#29 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 25 December 2012 - 04:56 AM

I think saying that a certain Atlas is best is very very subjective. But yes, the K is quite inferior.

#30 Ghogiel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • CS 2021 Gold Champ
  • 6,852 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 04:56 AM

I used to buy the K later in the closed beta after every wipe, take the 300XL out.
Sell it.
Buy a swayback and boat small lasers.

Was about all it was good for.

#31 xxx WreckinBallRaj xxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,852 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 05:04 AM

View PostGhogiel, on 25 December 2012 - 04:56 AM, said:

I used to buy the K later in the closed beta after every wipe, take the 300XL out.
Sell it.
Buy a swayback and boat small lasers.

Was about all it was good for.


Lol, I forgot all about that trick everyone used to do for the engine. But they made sure to fix that later because they realized no one wanted that trash variant for actual playing. Also, unlike other trash variants like the 2X or 4X Ravens, it doesn't eveb get picked for talent building since it's worst out of 4. It also costs a lot more. Hey, how would you like to have this trash, and pay an extra 3-4M for it too? It gets better though, the Stalker has a variant with 2 AMS on it and doesn't sacrifice any weapons, making it a much more logical pick for dual AMS'.(Assuming you, for some reason, ever wanted 2) So they basically buried it, buried it again, then buried it again. They're just digging that hole deeper and deeper for the poor old obsolete K.

#32 5th Fedcom Rat

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 893 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 05:09 AM

ECM shouldn't be on ANY atlas IMO. Just play a few 8-man games to see why. Heaviest mech that mounts it for now should be the cicada IMO.

#33 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 25 December 2012 - 05:17 AM

View Post5th Fedcom Rat, on 25 December 2012 - 05:09 AM, said:

ECM shouldn't be on ANY atlas IMO. Just play a few 8-man games to see why. Heaviest mech that mounts it for now should be the cicada IMO.


I must say I wouldn't really mind this. And I say that as a D-DC pilot.

#34 Biruke

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 4,162 posts
  • LocationMsk, RF, Terra

Posted 25 December 2012 - 05:27 AM

hands off the D-DC :P :(

#35 Rigiroth

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 350 posts
  • LocationValhala

Posted 25 December 2012 - 05:31 AM

While it pains me to agree because I personally hate the K and wouldn't pilot one even for ECM, it does need a buff. Adding ECM to it and making the missile port on it a ten instead of a 5 would work wonders.

#36 Grisnir

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 66 posts

Posted 25 December 2012 - 05:43 AM

View PostMustrumRidcully, on 25 December 2012 - 04:03 AM, said:

It seems pointless to have an ECM mech that has 2 AMS slots.

Can't we buff it in some other way? How about an additional weapon slot somewhere, say a side torso energy slot or a head-mounted weapon? Or maybe raise its torso twist range?


oh i take a second missile hardpoint, it would bring the K in one line with Atlas D and maybe 2 more laser hardpoints in the arms but that would be probably OP :(





4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users