Jump to content

Biased Poll Is Biased


8 replies to this topic

Poll: Biased Poll (4 member(s) have cast votes)

Should all weapons have their speed reduced to that of LRMs and require target lock just before and during point of impact to register as a hit?

  1. Yes (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. Yes, but only as an educational temporary patch (1 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  3. No (3 votes [75.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

If you voted No in the previous question - Why?

  1. I voted No because I'm even more unskilled than the unskilled noobs who use LOW, and I wouldn't be able to hit anything if I had to have target lock at the point of impact after all that waiting for my weapon to hit (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. I voted for one of the Yes options (4 votes [100.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Kaijin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,137 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:58 PM

I've had a brilliant idea. Let's have a patch that renders ALL weapons useless without target lock. Not just LRMs and SSRMs, but SRMs, Ballistics, Energy weapons - they would all have to have target lock just before and during the hit on the target mech in order for the shot to count as a hit.

Also, lets have the time from weapon to target be exactly the same as it is for the slowest weapon in the game...The one with a rocket engine...The LRM.

This patch would be to separate the skilled from the unskilled, because we all know that using weapons that require lock take no skill. So the skilled amongst us should not be bothered by this change, and be able to maintain their 1000 KDRs. The unskilled - well...they'll pretty much do as they always have done.

Edited by Kaijin, 15 December 2012 - 04:23 PM.


#2 GalaxyBluestar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,748 posts
  • Location...

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:03 PM

i'll translate for everyone...


Edited by GalaxyBluestar, 15 December 2012 - 04:05 PM.


#3 King Arthur IV

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 2,549 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:04 PM

so stray bullets dont count??? sold!!!!!! to every army in the world.

#4 Deadoon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:04 PM

I broke the poll.

#5 Elkarlo

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 911 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:07 PM

Would be a nice Eve-online like Method and more Strategical.
But personally i like to Aim a weapon and some Spread on the Laser (after the first 1/4 of the Beam the Lense gots hot)
or PPC A/C's would do the same..

And would make on the Pulse lasers ( they cool down between pulses so no spread) more intresting.

So instead of locking for all Weapons,

Randomized Missfires for Missles and Spread to direct Fire Weapons and no Lock Block...

That would be realy nice. But i don't think that most poeple want this.

#6 cmopatrick

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,026 posts
  • Locationa 45 tonner on patrol...

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:09 PM

i'm trying to figure out if you are being facetious or not... you do know that there are enough polls with leading questions and poor answer options already, right? if that's your point, it is rather hidden (or maybe i'm just too tired... i grant it is possible). if not... do you really think that an incomplete (hence false) choice reflects well on your analysis?

#7 Kaijin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,137 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:12 PM

View PostDeadoon, on 15 December 2012 - 04:04 PM, said:

I broke the poll.


Congrats!

Since it is such a biased poll and labelled as such, I made it anonymous, knowing full well that no hypocrite would admit to being one.

#8 Deadoon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:13 PM

View PostKaijin, on 15 December 2012 - 04:12 PM, said:


Congrats!

Since it is such a biased poll and labelled as such, I made it anonymous, knowing full well that no hypocrite would admit to being one.

I had to say it due to it was anonymous.

#9 Kaijin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,137 posts

Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:16 PM

View Postcmopatrick, on 15 December 2012 - 04:09 PM, said:

i'm trying to figure out if you are being facetious or not... you do know that there are enough polls with leading questions and poor answer options already, right? if that's your point, it is rather hidden (or maybe i'm just too tired... i grant it is possible). if not... do you really think that an incomplete (hence false) choice reflects well on your analysis?


My "analysis". That's rich! I've given up on making common sense arguments. Nobody pays any attention to them. MWO, and all my hopes and dreams for a fitting resurrection of the franchise are going in the c.r.a.p.p.e.r.. Might as well finish with a laugh.

Edited by Kaijin, 15 December 2012 - 04:17 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users