Sudden Reversal, on 17 December 2012 - 11:48 PM, said:
Raised an eyebrow at that poll, that is until I realised it was taken before the last patch and ECM implementation.
I am not the most vocal member, but I am also not delusional.
If PGI keep ECM the way it currently is without fixing the netcode pronto they will lose most non-US players. The reality is that after the next patch the outright frustration felt by the casual higher ping players will mean they will simply move on and most wont check back in a few months to see if it is fixed, they will actually have moved on to greener pastures.
A persons criticism of a subjects failings can have multitudinous objectives. In my personal case, it is because as an avid Battletech fan I desire this game to succeed, not fail as you mistakenly believe everyone else is doing.
Sticking my head in the sand certainly won't help, nor will being a cheer squad. This is after all BETA, as everyone is keen to remind perceived naysayers, and by defenition needs its faults pointed out for them to be fixed.
That's a straw man argument; you switch it from people discouraging a new player to pointing out
flaws one particular flaw in the game. Regardless:
Replies in that poll go on after ECM got introduced (agreed, that would skew the outcome though), but I agree that ECM with current netcode is a problem. Being from Holland, playing with ~150ms ping, I have to rely mostly on Streaks to hit really fast lights.
And yet, I don't have any particular issue with it. Aparently, neither does the majority:
http://mwomercs.com/...nd-ecm-for-now/
(edit: I do agree though that the votes against ECM are alarmingly high. So yes, something needs to be addressed here, be it ECM itself or netcode)
Does it need to be addressed? I'd say so, yes. But is it a reason to completely bash a game whenever someone voices something positive?
More on topic:
I never said people want it to fail, even the doomsayers, but that is exactly what they are contributing to by spewing their blind rage. You can't deny noone bothered to point out that these problems are being looked at, or any element of the game that is enjoyable.
Your last paragraph says exactly what I did: overly positive or negative responses are detrimental. Yes, problems need to be pointed out, but as noted a page ago these issues are all known, acknowledged and being looked at. Droning on about them when someone shows a positive attitude serves no purpose.
Edited by Arclight, 18 December 2012 - 12:34 AM.