23 replies to this topic

[Walter Soebchak]

That is all. You know I'm right and you should feel ashamed.

[Sifright]

Walter Soebchak, on 17 December 2012 - 05:32 PM, said:

That is all. You know I'm right and you should feel ashamed.

I agree those founders should be ashamed of them selves.

[Walter Soebchak]

Right...

[PANZERBUNNY]

That's because some of us have been around the block a few times and see the warning signs of pandering to the lowest common denominator.

It's called forethought. Something they don't seem to have.

Edited by PANZERBUNNY, 17 December 2012 - 05:39 PM.

[Deadoon]

Same thing happened with ECM and people still say it is fine now, despite it's battlefield distuption factor being immense.

[Vassago Rain]

PANZERBUNNY, on 17 December 2012 - 05:36 PM, said:

That's because some of us have been around the block a few times and see the warning signs of pandering to the lowest common denominator.

It's called forethought. Something they don't seem to have.

Is your gold sense tingling?

[Lokust Davion]

Sifright, on 17 December 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:

I agree those founders should be ashamed of them selves.

I'm not ashamed!!

[Vassago Rain]

Deadoon, on 17 December 2012 - 05:38 PM, said:

Same thing happened with ECM and people still say it is fine now, despite it's battlefield distuption factor being immense.

It's not ECM itself, but that it's available on light mechs that lagshield around, and need double-D atlases with streaks to hardcounter them, or they'lll backcap you.

[gavking]

No one knows what to except

[Vexgrave Lars]

PANZERBUNNY, on 17 December 2012 - 05:36 PM, said:

That's because some of us have been around the block a few times and see the warning signs of pandering to the lowest common denominator.

Many would say your cynical PANZER... and a very few would say we seen it coming, when they went with double armor.

The most people, paying the most money, regardless of what it actually does to the game. The concept of integrity is lost again on the almighty dollar.

Just relax man, its a game..get what you can from it and don't take it too seriously.

Edited by Vexgrave Lars, 17 December 2012 - 05:42 PM.

[Stone Profit]

No founders (or MC) shame here. I also prefer to see firsthand rather than ***** before its even released...

[Daekar]

It no longer surprises me... I expect childish overreactions, and I'm never wrong.

I can see why people might have reservations about the R&R change, but I think those reservations will ultimately prove needless. I'm not forming any opinions until I've played the new patch for at least a few days.

[Joseph Mallan]

Sifright, on 17 December 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:

I agree those founders should be ashamed of them selves.

Yes we should be ashamed of ourselves. We only invested in a game set in the BattleTech Universe where the idea of Respawning has not occurred. And it is shameful that we expected the game to remain that way! Respawning is not a part of a game I want to play. I am totally able/willing to wait 10 whole minutes to play again! Cause I can die gracefully in the confine of a video game.

Edited by Joseph Mallan, 17 December 2012 - 05:44 PM.

[Joe Mallad]

Sifright, on 17 December 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:

I agree those founders should be ashamed of them selves.

lets not speak for ALL please. I for one am happy with what we are getting but not getting too happy just yet until I see how it all plays out.

[Smeghead87]

Inb4 someone posts the 'you must be new here' meme

[Joseph Mallan]

Deadoon, on 17 December 2012 - 05:38 PM, said:

Same thing happened with ECM and people still say it is fine now, despite it's battlefield distuption factor being immense.

ECM would be fine if we were using Angel and not Guardian.

[Joe Mallad]

Joseph Mallan, on 17 December 2012 - 05:42 PM, said:

Yes we should be ashamed of ourselves. We only invested in a game set in the BattleTech Universe where the idea of Respawning has not occurred. And it is shameful that we expected the game to remain that way! Respawning is not a part of a game I want to play. I am totally able/willing to wait 10 whole minutes to play again! Cause I can die gracefully in the confine of a video game.

spoken well my brother from a different mother

[80sGlamRockSensation David Bowie]

The biggest complaint so far is that they are temporarily removing repair/rearm.

Gee, ever wonder why? Maybe they are planning to completely revamp rnr until they can get some solid numbers with the new system so that it takes out a certian % on average of all builds, and not so much that if you have missile ammo, the repair bills only primarily affect you.

Some people cannot accept there are growing pains involved with game development. But at the same time, people also cannot peel themselves away from a video game either to take a hiatus and see how things worked out a month later, either.

[Sifright]

Joseph Mallan, on 17 December 2012 - 05:42 PM, said:

Yes we should be ashamed of ourselves. We only invested in a game set in the BattleTech Universe where the idea of Respawning has not occurred. And it is shameful that we expected the game to remain that way! Respawning is not a part of a game I want to play. I am totally able/willing to wait 10 whole minutes to play again! Cause I can die gracefully in the confine of a video game.

......

No one is suggesting respawning should be added.

Neither are the devs.

There have been other successful shooters that don't have respawning.


You know counter strike? The most popular FPS mod for a game ever?

A lot of people like to have consequences they just don't want those consequences being a wrecking ball to the testicIes.

edit:What since when was ********* a blocked word thats insane.

Edited by Sifright, 17 December 2012 - 05:58 PM.

[M4NTiC0R3X]

Need to learn to cope, it can be challenging, especially immediately.. but it's either learn to cope or stop logging in.

Personally I couldn't go longer than 48 hours without one match and usually make 6 - 7 million C-Bills everyday I'm not totally wiped from the previous... session?