47 replies to this topic

[Joe3142]

This patch was an improvement, it feels like it is now heading in the right direction, despite the issues.

[Vassago Rain]

Veevslav, on 18 December 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

They can give me a refund or face a lawsuit based on Utah's laws where their product was sold. They promised a good product and what they have provided is ****. I should not have to suffer with 20-30 fps with my gaming rig when I can play Planetside 2 on high settings and get 50-60 fps. I chose not to play PS2 cuz it sucks as a game. I dont want to play modern warfare online.
I should not have to deal with the net code issues. They had 5 months to figure them out. They had 5 months of make any progress on balance. Instead what I see is a sledge hammer being used to fix small problems.

It's been too long for anyone to take you seriously, man, except maybe your own bank.

Stop whining here and call your creditcard company, or go to your bank. PGI can't, and won't, give you your money back this long after you purchased founders.

[DeadlyNerd]

Veevslav, on 18 December 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

They can give me a refund or face a lawsuit based on Utah's laws where their product was sold. They promised a good product and what they have provided is ****. I should not have to suffer with 20-30 fps with my gaming rig when I can play Planetside 2 on high settings and get 50-60 fps. I chose not to play PS2 cuz it sucks as a game. I dont want to play modern warfare online.
I should not have to deal with the net code issues. They had 5 months to figure them out. They had 5 months of make any progress on balance. Instead what I see is a sledge hammer being used to fix small problems.

They can't face any lawsuits as their product was rated highly by credible critics and your individual opinion isn't worth *****.

[cSand]

Veevslav, on 18 December 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

They can give me a refund or face a lawsuit based on Utah's laws where their product was sold. They promised a good product and what they have provided is ****. I should not have to suffer with 20-30 fps with my gaming rig when I can play Planetside 2 on high settings and get 50-60 fps. I chose not to play PS2 cuz it sucks as a game. I dont want to play modern warfare online.
I should not have to deal with the net code issues. They had 5 months to figure them out. They had 5 months of make any progress on balance. Instead what I see is a sledge hammer being used to fix small problems.

btw, good luck with the lawsuit

[HighlandCoo]

grabs popcorn

[Sulf]

I think the appropriate action is for PGI to seize his unwanted assets and put them in a "Mech Pilots in need" fund. That way, poor players could be awarded small amounts of MC for consistent play, without devaluing the currency.

[Faceless Priest]

Humor, the best xmas present ever! Thank you OP!

[Deadoon]

Veevslav, on 18 December 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

They can give me a refund or face a lawsuit based on Utah's laws where their product was sold. They promised a good product and what they have provided is ****. I should not have to suffer with 20-30 fps with my gaming rig when I can play Planetside 2 on high settings and get 50-60 fps. I chose not to play PS2 cuz it sucks as a game. I dont want to play modern warfare online.
I should not have to deal with the net code issues. They had 5 months to figure them out. They had 5 months of make any progress on balance. Instead what I see is a sledge hammer being used to fix small problems.

They never promised specifically a good product, they promised an unfinished product.
Also you purchased and got what you purchased already, no strings attached there. What you can use that product with is in your opinion sub par.

Also, they are in Canada.

You cannot claim false advertising, as it specifically said that the product is in beta, which in turn marks it as non-final.

Do you claim a lawsuit against nintendo due to one a game for one of their consoles wasn't up to your standards?

[Vassago Rain]

Deadoon, on 18 December 2012 - 07:17 PM, said:

They never promised specifically a good product, they promised an unfinished product.
Also you purchased and got what you purchased already, no strings attached there. What you can use that product with is in your opinion sub par.

Also, they are in Canada.

You cannot claim false advertising, as it specifically said that the product is in beta, which in turn marks it as non-final.

Do you claim a lawsuit against nintendo due to one a game for one of their consoles wasn't up to your standards?

Sure. You can bring nintendo to small claim's over a bad game, just like you can do the same to steam, or anyone else. But 5 months after purchase? Not likely to fly.

Even the ancient greeks would snicker at this. This long after purchase, you could maybe talk your bank into it, but that's about it,

[Ghogiel]

This plan of the OPs is genius.

Spend large sums of money on court fees and suing them, get a refund. Then buy another game.

Rinse and repeat and it's free games for evar!

[Omigir]

I dont think this guys know what he purchased :\
Founders pack was a 3 Month subscription and a founders mech. Or 4 founders mechs. So.. really.. you didnt by the 'Game' cus its Free to play.

[Karyudo ds]

Omigir, on 18 December 2012 - 07:31 PM, said:

I dont think this guys know what he purchased :\
Founders pack was a 3 Month subscription and a founders mech. Or 4 founders mechs. So.. really.. you didnt by the 'Game' cus its Free to play.

So...he got EXACTLY what he was actually paying for? Nonsense!!!

[Idzy]

either its a beta and he should get a refund or its been released and he shouldn't it should be illegal to charge for access to a beta test. In which case his fouders pack is basically a preorder and should be refundable until the full game is released they can't have it both ways.

Edited by Idzy, 18 December 2012 - 07:36 PM.

[BCOVertigo]

So, um... You should probably send in a complaint formally or something.

I mean unless you just want to be made fun of in General Discussion. If that's your thing then don't let me get in your way. We don't really have your money though. We have OUR money, but you can't have that.

[cSand]

Idzy, on 18 December 2012 - 07:35 PM, said:

either its a beta and he should get a refund or its been released and he shouldn't it should be illegal to charge for access to a beta test. In which case his fouders pack is basically a preorder and should be refundable until the full game is released they can't have it both ways.

Someone up there said it before. The game's FREE. Which means, no money is charged for the game. What he bought, was a subscription for premium time, and some mechs, and whatever else came with the package... all of which he got

[LogicSol]

Tempered, on 18 December 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

So the guy wants to quit and feels the need to tell pgi why. Why do you all feel the need to troll him for it? Just let him go.

Because his reasons are terrible, and he should feel bad.

[Hellion]

There was a big long thoughtful post that I had here but after the lawsuit comment .....

Edited by Hellion, 18 December 2012 - 08:04 PM.

[Krivvan]

M A L I C E, on 18 December 2012 - 07:10 PM, said:

Bots?

I'm dubious you have any proof whatsoever that there are working bots for this game.

Prove me wrong...

There are working aimbots for the game. A quick google search will lead you to them. They aren't particularly good though. There's little you can do to stop 3rd party aimbots besides community solutions.

Edited by Krivvan, 18 December 2012 - 07:45 PM.

[Tickdoff Tank]

http://www.grapheine...6d0908cd57.html

[Mystere]

Go ahead. File a lawsuit. I dare you. If you don't, then you're just full of s***.

I also logged in just to reply.