Jump to content

Ecm Split Poll


  • You cannot reply to this topic
6 replies to this topic

Poll: ECM split (33 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you like to see ECM split into 3 devices as in TT?

  1. Yes, ECM is OP (13 votes [39.39%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 39.39%

  2. Yes, although there's no problem with it now, I just want more diversity in equipment (10 votes [30.30%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 30.30%

  3. No, although I don't like the way ECM is now (6 votes [18.18%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

  4. No, ECM is awesome, don't change it EVAH! (4 votes [12.12%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.12%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 KingNobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 216 posts

Posted 23 December 2012 - 01:13 PM

There's been a lot of talk about ECM lately, and whether or not it's balanced in the current game. I thought I'd throw this poll up to see how many people would like to see 3 different ECM devices in this game as there are in TT. (Guardian ECM, Angel ECM, Null Sig)

Each device could take on one of the functions of the current ECM, all 'mechs could be able to carry at least one of the devices, with the "ECM" 'mechs carrying the full suite.

#2 Deadoon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

Posted 23 December 2012 - 03:53 PM

Angel and null sig are different than the guardian, the angel is a direct experimental upgrade, and the null sig is a derived system.

Also neither the null sig or the angel are even available yet at the current timeline.

#3 Goreshade

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 76 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationKissimmee, Florida

Posted 24 December 2012 - 12:45 AM

View PostKingNobody, on 23 December 2012 - 01:13 PM, said:

There's been a lot of talk about ECM lately, and whether or not it's balanced in the current game. I thought I'd throw this poll up to see how many people would like to see 3 different ECM devices in this game as there are in TT. (Guardian ECM, Angel ECM, Null Sig)

Each device could take on one of the functions of the current ECM, all 'mechs could be able to carry at least one of the devices, with the "ECM" 'mechs carrying the full suite.


We shouldn't even have Angel ECM, until 3052 when the first experimental ones we're developed, during the Battle of Luthien. Also, Angel ECM has a ECCM counter mode, which is in the current implementation, and is a little OP, but can be balanced once the Bloodhound Active Probe is implemented in 3058. The TT has everything you need to counter this and counter that. There was a big war that destroyed all the technology, it pretty much sent their weapons and equipment back to the stone age. But I agree the ECM isn't correct to ERA, we should have the Guardian ECM, which is nothing like the Angel ECM.

Guardian ECM has 1 mode and thats it, disrupt. It only blocks radar, targeting, NARC, Artimes IV, C3 slave systems, and Beagle Active Probe. It doesn't block locking like Angel ECM does, but how do you lock on without being able to acquire a target? Instead you make it so missle mechs have to lock on by directly pointing at a mech in its line of sight. This would put the missle boats at risk of taking damage, but still make missle boats not so gimped vs ECM. As far as SSRM, it needs to have dummy firing like the TT rules does, so you can still fire at mechs at close range.

#4 Deadoon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts

Posted 24 December 2012 - 03:49 AM

View PostGoreshade, on 24 December 2012 - 12:45 AM, said:


We shouldn't even have Angel ECM, until 3052 when the first experimental ones we're developed, during the Battle of Luthien. Also, Angel ECM has a ECCM counter mode, which is in the current implementation, and is a little OP, but can be balanced once the Bloodhound Active Probe is implemented in 3058. The TT has everything you need to counter this and counter that. There was a big war that destroyed all the technology, it pretty much sent their weapons and equipment back to the stone age. But I agree the ECM isn't correct to ERA, we should have the Guardian ECM, which is nothing like the Angel ECM.

Guardian ECM has 1 mode and thats it, disrupt. It only blocks radar, targeting, NARC, Artimes IV, C3 slave systems, and Beagle Active Probe. It doesn't block locking like Angel ECM does, but how do you lock on without being able to acquire a target? Instead you make it so missle mechs have to lock on by directly pointing at a mech in its line of sight. This would put the missle boats at risk of taking damage, but still make missle boats not so gimped vs ECM. As far as SSRM, it needs to have dummy firing like the TT rules does, so you can still fire at mechs at close range.

Actually, Guardian does have eccm, that is part of the ECCM rules, angel just counts as 2 ecm or ECCM.

#5 WiCkEd

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationLouisiana

Posted 24 December 2012 - 04:51 AM

good poll.

#6 Firewuff

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,204 posts
  • LocationMelbourne

Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:00 AM

If they removed the stacking and TAG locks wasn't slowed which makes no sense to me it would be a lot better.... when you get 4 enemy ECM and they are on voice chat then your dead regardless.

#7 KingNobody

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 216 posts

Posted 26 December 2012 - 11:58 AM

I hadn't realized that ANgel ECM doesn't come out for another two years... And we won't see Bloodhound for another 9 :)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users