

Need To Speed Up The Mwo Timeline!
#1
Posted 24 December 2012 - 08:29 PM
#2
Posted 24 December 2012 - 08:34 PM
#3
Posted 24 December 2012 - 08:35 PM
#4
Posted 24 December 2012 - 08:38 PM
#5
Posted 24 December 2012 - 08:38 PM

#8
Posted 24 December 2012 - 09:31 PM
But I hope I am wrong because that would make the Angel pretty powerful.
#9
Posted 24 December 2012 - 09:34 PM
von Pilsner, on 24 December 2012 - 09:31 PM, said:
But I hope I am wrong because that would make the Angel pretty powerful.
the Guardian has no effect on Streak SRMs, only the Angel does, and the ECM in MWO was brought in to counter streaks, thus the Angel system
#10
Posted 24 December 2012 - 09:37 PM
Felix, on 24 December 2012 - 09:27 PM, said:
the version of ECM they included is the Angel suite of 3055, not the Guardian of 3050
Not quite. Angel ECM allows Streaks to fire, they just roll on the cluster table with a successful to-hit roll as if they were dumb-fire SRMs.
#11
Posted 24 December 2012 - 09:37 PM
#12
Posted 24 December 2012 - 09:49 PM
no but seriuosly its horrible right now.
maybe if this game is a success the mechs will come out at a more reasonable pace. but for that to happen all of us have to stand by their decisions to make the game accessible to new players (3rd person view etc.)
#13
Posted 24 December 2012 - 09:57 PM
Felix, on 24 December 2012 - 08:34 PM, said:
no there not...
Tennex, on 24 December 2012 - 09:49 PM, said:
no but seriuosly its horrible right now.
maybe if this game is a success the mechs will come out at a more reasonable pace. but for that to happen all of us have to stand by their decisions to make the game accessible to new players (3rd person view etc.)
its supposed to be 2 per month at least, perhaps currently there doing 1 innersphere and 1 clan mech at a time?.. hiding the clan mechs so they have a stockpile ready for when they 'invade'
#14
Posted 24 December 2012 - 10:30 PM
#16
Posted 24 December 2012 - 11:16 PM
#17
Posted 24 December 2012 - 11:31 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users