6 replies to this topic

[bonapartist1]

I think there should be an additional bonus of about 10K cbill and 50 experience for the top one or two players on each team. Perhaps a limited implemenation for just the losing team would be nice, so that the players who fought heroically despite their team losing will get a larger (or even adequate) Cbill and XP payoff.

Also, lower prices on everything. It's LOCO.

[blinkin]

an MVP award would be nice as long as it is kept small so players do not abandon their team so they can get MVP.

[bonapartist1]

It's crazy to see a talented ace on the losing team make fewer points than the AFK guy on the winning team... Hm.

[FerrolupisXIII]

the top of team is probably already making the most money on their team. so i dont think its needed.

[tops14]

I'd say: award following team orders, such as in BF3. This improves teamplay and lasting gameplay greatly!

I'd imagine opening lances of 2-4 players, with a commander which can issue orders. Orders may be cappaing, targetting, converging on sector etc.

No idea how easy/cumbersome it will be to implement though..

cheers

[Gremlich Johns]

bonapartist1, on 26 December 2012 - 04:44 PM, said:

I think there should be an additional bonus of about 10K cbill and 50 experience for the top one or two players on each team. Perhaps a limited implemenation for just the losing team would be nice, so that the players who fought heroically despite their team losing will get a larger (or even adequate) Cbill and XP payoff.

That might be okay for a merc team, but not a House unit. That is what promotions and awards are for (in a professional military).

[juxstapo]

Yea, I've personally wished for this a time or two (or twelve, lol). But blinkin killed my fantasy with one sentence. Glory hounds would kill the experience. Especially when Pug'n