45 replies to this topic

[PANZERBUNNY]

Turn your mech when a giant volley of Streaks are coming at you?

I think the larger issues of net code, lag shield and invincible lights have more of an effect on how much coring is being done to mechs their superior.

They were going to make it so people could target specific parts of a mech with Streaks. Be thankful it's like this?

If they nerf it too much it will become a redundant system.

Best to fix other issues and see if the "problem" with Streams persists.

[Zero G BD]

You ever try to turn your torso against streaks? It has never worked for me they still hit CT every time.

[Mystere]

I very rarely do something like this, but, deal with it and L2P. Other players do so without any QQ.

[PANZERBUNNY]

Mystere, on 27 December 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I very rarely do something like this, but, deal with it and L2P. Other players do so without any QQ.

IF everyone says "deal with it L2P", the devs don't get the data they need to tweak, nerf or buff items.

You sound like a tourist. When will you be going back to your game of choice?

[Mystere]

PANZERBUNNY, on 27 December 2012 - 07:46 PM, said:

IF everyone says "deal with it L2P", the devs don't get the data they need to tweak, nerf or buff items.

You sound like a tourist. When will you be going back to your game of choice?

Aren't you sick of all the QQ/nerf/buff threads? I know I am.

As for being a tourist, try again, but much harder next time.

[Webber]

Founder tourist? Huh. Guess he put down money to just not play the game?

He's right though. L2P.

Edited by Webber, 27 December 2012 - 07:52 PM.

[PANZERBUNNY]

I am when it serves no purpose.

ECM is absolutely terrible and implemented like a downsy crack smokin workin girl.

If I don't want to read something, I utilize my ability to....no...read....things...that bother me.

Self restraint. Try it out.

Go read the meme thread.

Webber, on 27 December 2012 - 07:52 PM, said:

Founder tourist? Huh. Guess he put down money to just not play the game?

He's right though. L2P.

L2P a broken system haha.

Make perfect sense.

[xxx WreckinBallRaj xxx]

PANZERBUNNY, on 27 December 2012 - 07:46 PM, said:

IF everyone says "deal with it L2P", the devs don't get the data they need to tweak, nerf or buff items.

This is correct. Also, all the people saying L2P couldn't do it themselves in the first place, thus why they were given the jesus box.

[Webber]

Bluten, on 27 December 2012 - 07:54 PM, said:

This is correct. Also, all the people saying L2P couldn't do it themselves in the first place, thus why they were given the jesus box.

Strangely, I was doing better in my jenner than my raven. ECM has only increased my threat level to people in games. They feel all ravens must die, not only the 3L.

The ECM helped the raven, and I would love to see it removed from the commando, and added to the upcoming spider.

[Zero G BD]

The best part about the not so bright people who say L2P, are the same people who say it's just a BETA. I am sure glad that I never had any people like this involved in any of the beta testing I have done. The so called QQ is exactly what they are looking for during a "BETA".

Please grab a clue before you post.

[PANZERBUNNY]

Same people telling everyone to L2P will be the first ones to shed buckets of tears when their light super mechs can fall down again. haha!

[xxx WreckinBallRaj xxx]

PANZERBUNNY, on 27 December 2012 - 08:01 PM, said:

Same people telling everyone to L2P will be the first ones to shed buckets of tears when their light super mechs can fall down again. haha!

It'll never happen. Lights are Garth's favorite.

[PANZERBUNNY]

They can't keep this going for a long period of time without collision.

I want to play clown car music whenever I drop these days.

Edited by PANZERBUNNY, 27 December 2012 - 08:05 PM.

[Mystere]

Wrede, on 27 December 2012 - 06:34 PM, said:

if you don't have ecm you loose if one team have 2 more ecm than you you loose.

So the logic used above by the OP is "bright"? Victory or defeat is determined just by the number of ECMs one side has over the other? Is this the kind of comment that is actually useful to the devs?

If that is indeed the case, I'd rather be stupid.

[Zero G BD]

Do you have stats to show that the ECM isn't OP? Or to show that on average the number of ECM mechs on a team has no effect on the win / loss ratio of said teams?

This is something the devs need to look at, if they have the stats and it shows something different then most players are seeing they can feel free to tell people that, and as such with reason say that the system will stay as is.

With out having the data at hand all people can say is what they are seeing, QQ L2P serves no purpose for the devs or the comunity as a whole. So while the OP may not have been worded as well as it could have been, it is far brighter then the response.

[Mystere]

Zero G BD, on 27 December 2012 - 08:22 PM, said:

With out having the data at hand all people can say is what they are seeing, QQ L2P serves no purpose for the devs or the comunity as a whole. So while the OP may not have been worded as well as it could have been, it is far brighter then the response.

I guess we'll just have to disagree on the "brighter" part.

But just as a check, which do you think are "brighter" posts, #3 and #12, or #9 and #30.

[Zero G BD]

I happen to know the guy who posted #30 is an *****, not much that can be done about that guy.

[MajorLeeHung]

Davers, on 27 December 2012 - 07:06 PM, said:

Well the Devs said the chassis would be a factor in matchmaking. I am sure the ECM ones will be given a higher cost than non-ECM ones.

I have high hopes for this in community warfare. In 3050 electronic warfare mechs were rare. If an operation was going on on planet if you saw two ON THE PLANET you would be like man were awesome we have two EW mechs. You sure as **** would not see six-eight and sure hell not in ONE place at the same time. Also in every book I ever read because they are super rare and worth a small fortune a EW mech never activly participated in battle. role warfare... cant wait to see community warfare implement this

[siLve00]

Wrede, on 27 December 2012 - 06:34 PM, said:

ECM need to be removed untill they either nerf if or get proper counter to its as it is now if you don't have ecm you loose if one team have 2 more ecm than you you loose.

oh my.....
then you should just run ECM mechs... and you have atleast 1 in your teambank.

QQ lrm
QQ ssrm
QQ ECM
QQ mhh QQ

[Kaspirikay]

To all those that say "Learn to play"

Give me my torso only streaks. I learned to play that well.