Jump to content

If Collisions Have To Be Removed Because They "can't Be Done Right" Yet...


22 replies to this topic

#1 Volume

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Privateer
  • The Privateer
  • 1,097 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:29 AM

How about you take out Streaks
And ECM
and Convergence.

Especially the last one. How the hell am I supposed to lead a target (with lag) by aiming in front of it, when my weapons feel like converging on the rock or the ground and not where he'll actually be?

Ugh.

#2 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:34 AM

View PostVolume, on 07 January 2013 - 12:29 AM, said:

How about you take out Streaks
And ECM
and Convergence.

Especially the last one. How the hell am I supposed to lead a target (with lag) by aiming in front of it, when my weapons feel like converging on the rock or the ground and not where he'll actually be?

Ugh.


Learn 2 play scrub. Also go join a team on TS, which will immediately solve your issues and cure Acne.

/sarcasm

#3 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:50 AM

View PostThirdstar, on 07 January 2013 - 12:34 AM, said:


Learn 2 play scrub. Also go join a team on TS, which will immediately solve your issues and cure Acne.

/sarcasm

You forgot it's Beta.

Well, compared to Convergence, Collisions really seemed worse. Even though Convergence is working really bad.

#4 Merky Merc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Bludgeon
  • The Bludgeon
  • 871 posts
  • LocationRidin down the street in my 6-4

Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:55 AM

If we're removing those things, lets do LRMs too yeah?

#5 Inertiaman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 865 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:06 AM

And cicadas.

#6 PiemasterXL

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 556 posts
  • LocationThe deep-south, cookin' Moonshine.

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:10 AM

and all weapons. So basically its walk around online.

#7 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:11 AM

View PostPiemasterXL, on 07 January 2013 - 01:10 AM, said:

and all weapons. So basically its walk around online.


Only if we could get mech sized axes, swords and maces to replace them.

#8 Volume

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Privateer
  • The Privateer
  • 1,097 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:11 AM

View PostMerky Merc, on 07 January 2013 - 12:55 AM, said:

If we're removing those things, lets do LRMs too yeah?


I thought they were already effectively removed, thanks to the existence of ECM.


View PostPiemasterXL, on 07 January 2013 - 01:10 AM, said:

and all weapons. So basically its walk around online.


Nope, nopenopenopenope, all weapons with 0.5-1.5 sec lockon that basically work by "aim at something, hold M1 and circle it until it dies" while other people actually have to aim (not at their targets, of course, but in front of them, despite having good ping, because their opponent has like ~250ms and has netflix, utorrent, and pandora running at the same time to exploit horrid netcode in this game).

Of course we can't REALLY aim in front of them because of convergence needing you to focus on your target if you want your weapons to actually hit, so...

Edited by Volume, 07 January 2013 - 01:13 AM.


#9 Merky Merc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Bludgeon
  • The Bludgeon
  • 871 posts
  • LocationRidin down the street in my 6-4

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:15 AM

View PostVolume, on 07 January 2013 - 01:11 AM, said:


I thought they were already effectively removed, thanks to the existence of ECM.



Nein, now you need ECM to avoid the withering fire of LRM boats.

#10 kragmoor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 111 posts
  • Locationohio

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:33 AM

View PostThirdstar, on 07 January 2013 - 01:11 AM, said:


Only if we could get mech sized axes, swords and maces to replace them.

wasn't there a mech that had hatchets? the axeman or something like that...

#11 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:35 AM

View Postkragmoor, on 07 January 2013 - 01:33 AM, said:

wasn't there a mech that had hatchets? the axeman or something like that...


http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Hatchetman

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Axman

#12 PANZERBUNNY

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,080 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationToronto, Canada

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:37 AM

Streaks are fine.

Just pretend that your computer is locked into firing them at center mass for the sure chance to hit, instead of limbs where the chance of deviation increases.

#13 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:41 AM

View Postkragmoor, on 07 January 2013 - 01:33 AM, said:

wasn't there a mech that had hatchets? the axeman or something like that...

Hatchetman.

Posted Image

Or how about this:

Posted Image

Quite a lot of bullets for an AC/10...

Or the Axman. Or the Bucaneer. Or the Berserker.

Spoiler

Edited by MustrumRidcully, 07 January 2013 - 01:48 AM.


#14 PANZERBUNNY

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,080 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationToronto, Canada

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:45 AM

We don't need another weapon that isn't direct fire and spreads damage across a mech...

Making Ac's direct fire was a good choice.

They could MAKE it look like a hail of bullets, but that will take away from Rotary AC's when we get them.

Either way. Good choice to help people not masters of the rules and Btech lore to determine what weapons are being used instead of being confused.

Edited by PANZERBUNNY, 07 January 2013 - 01:49 AM.


#15 Critical Fumble

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 810 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:47 AM

I wonder if people would still defend the way streak launchers were implemented if we had clantech ones, which have 33% more range and can fire up to three times as much.

I can hear the "L2P" now.

#16 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:48 AM

View PostMustrumRidcully, on 07 January 2013 - 01:41 AM, said:

Hatchetman.

Posted Image

Or how about this:

Posted Image

Quite a lot of bullets for an AC/10...

Or the Axman. Or the Bucaneer.


Is it just me or are some of those designs eye bleedingly bad?

#17 PiemasterXL

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 556 posts
  • LocationThe deep-south, cookin' Moonshine.

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:51 AM

Posted Image

#18 DrBunji

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 205 posts
  • LocationNorthwind

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:51 AM

View PostThirdstar, on 07 January 2013 - 01:48 AM, said:


Is it just me or are some of those designs eye bleedingly bad?

All of the oldschool drawings of the mechs look ******* bad. Bad. Thats why PGI has made it a point to have an awesome art team redesign every ******* mech. Which is why the Stalker looks like a stubby, heavy catapult and not like the hindenburg, between two bricks of ****, on legs.

#19 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:55 AM

View PostDrBunji, on 07 January 2013 - 01:51 AM, said:

All of the oldschool drawings of the mechs look ******* bad. Bad. Thats why PGI has made it a point to have an awesome art team redesign every ******* mech.

THe art team really does good work on PGI. Too bad FASA didn't have money for people like that back then. Or maybe it was the lack of affordable software to make good art back then?

Quote

Which is why the Stalker looks like a stubby, heavy catapult and not like the hindenburg, between two bricks of ****, on legs.

And that's just the family-friendly description.

#20 PANZERBUNNY

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,080 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationToronto, Canada

Posted 07 January 2013 - 01:58 AM

View PostCritical Fumble, on 07 January 2013 - 01:47 AM, said:

I wonder if people would still defend the way streak launchers were implemented if we had clantech ones, which have 33% more range and can fire up to three times as much.

I can hear the "L2P" now.


I was using Streaks when they couldn't damage the backs of an Atlas and everyone thought they sucked, even when they could damage the backs of an Atlas.

It took a while for people to appreciate reliable damage instead of the terrible spread of SRMS.

People are really feeling the Sting due to the current role of lights...ie. Invincible warrior gods circling you like buzzards sent by the Lord of Death.

Edited by PANZERBUNNY, 07 January 2013 - 02:01 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users