...am I The Only One That Likes The Lbx?
#1
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:18 AM
#2
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:20 AM
Edited by StalaggtIKE, 09 January 2013 - 08:21 AM.
#3
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:26 AM
Edited by Gigastrike, 09 January 2013 - 08:27 AM.
#4
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:27 AM
#5
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:31 AM
I tried to make a similar build with the 4G, seeing if it can replace the 4H (since the 4G is my founder, which I gotta keep anyway), but it can't be done. The 4H will stay in my garage and so will the lbx10.
Now I just hope for a bit of a buff for the lbx10 in the future. More crit-chance would even out its habbit to spray its 10 damage all over CT, RT and LT.
#6
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:32 AM
I use them like SRMs as a short-range ballistic deterrent to lights.
Think "sawed-off shotgun".
#7
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:35 AM
#8
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:38 AM
That being said, I admit I used them on pretty much all my mechs before I figured out that I was doing way too much damage before finally downing the enemy mech. For this reason I've switched over to either AC10's, or two AC5's. The AC10 still offers 10 points of damage, at about the same range. The dual AC5's offer more range, which is handy in some cases, and a better rate of fire.
I dunno, I used to love them, but now I don't use them anymore.
#9
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:40 AM
#10
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:40 AM
I have an AC20 on my Cataphract 2x. I thought about swapping it for the LBX, since I also run 2 SRM 6's on it as well, so I end up in a melee fight sometimes, but with only 14 rounds of ammo for the AC20, I usually run out while I'm closing the distance between myself and the enemies. The AC allows me to do more focused damage to them while closing, whereas I'd have to wait if I had the LBX, and since this is a Cataphract, it has a wide area to hit so I personally think it's better to do what damage I can with the AC, and then SRMS for the closer ranges...but i could just as easily go with the LBX, but due to the wide frame the pract has, I like to at least do some distance damage.
Edited by Penance, 09 January 2013 - 08:47 AM.
#11
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:42 AM
So far I like it.
#12
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:42 AM
#13
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:48 AM
bug3at3r, on 09 January 2013 - 08:35 AM, said:
15 ammo per ton is already pretty neat. I usually never use up my 3 tons.
#15
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:51 AM
I guess making the pellets count as 2.0 damage when critical hits happen would also balanced it in making it an internal equipment destroyer.
#16
Posted 09 January 2013 - 08:52 AM
#18
Posted 09 January 2013 - 09:00 AM
If you could switch between slugs and cluster i might use it again.
#19
Posted 09 January 2013 - 09:01 AM
I also think we might benefit from having selectable ammo types for the lb10, if the game allows for that from the technical standpoint, which it should..If the LB10 slugs can deal somewhat less direct damage than an ac10, attributing to its shorter barrel..
Edited by merz, 09 January 2013 - 09:04 AM.
#20
Posted 09 January 2013 - 09:01 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users