Nope.
5
I Give Pgi One More Pach To Just Comment On The Ecm Or I Boycot This Game. Are You In With Me?
Started by twibs, Jan 15 2013 04:34 PM
165 replies to this topic
#161
Posted 16 January 2013 - 04:43 PM
#162
Posted 16 January 2013 - 04:53 PM
Grraarrgghh, on 16 January 2013 - 04:37 PM, said:
Hey twibs, quit being such a brat and use forum search for once.
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1749106
Just posted today you putz.
EDIT:
And again he just posted
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1750287
Now can we stop with these moronic threads?
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1749106
Just posted today you putz.
EDIT:
And again he just posted
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1750287
Now can we stop with these moronic threads?
He already linked to my posts that link to those posts 22 minutes before you posted them here. Can we all stop calling him out for something he's already linked to? He even edited it into the original post.
#163
Posted 16 January 2013 - 05:17 PM
Grraarrgghh, on 16 January 2013 - 04:37 PM, said:
Hey twibs, quit being such a brat and use forum search for once.
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1749106
Just posted today you putz.
EDIT:
And again he just posted
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1750287
Now can we stop with these moronic threads?
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1749106
Just posted today you putz.
EDIT:
And again he just posted
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1750287
Now can we stop with these moronic threads?
Yes, almost. Still missing the promised reply on PGI's stance about the ECM.
Also like TehCable said, I found it before you even linked it here, but thank you for caring enough to make sure I knew about it
#164
Posted 16 January 2013 - 05:19 PM
No.
I didn't boycott Microsoft after Ian Dresari. I'm not boycotting PGI for something that needs tweaked.
I didn't boycott Microsoft after Ian Dresari. I'm not boycotting PGI for something that needs tweaked.
#165
Posted 16 January 2013 - 05:25 PM
Also http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__1750287
Garth Erlam, on 16 January 2013 - 04:38 PM, said:
This'll be my last post on the subject, as Paul mentioned what we're doing in regards to speaking to the changes.
ECM being used on all ECM-able Mechs does show that it is overly powerful. The reason no changes have been made is it takes time to figure out what, exactly, is making that the reason. Is it the lock prevention? The 'cloak'? The range it works at? The weight? Crit space? Variants that use it? That it makes LRMs incapable of lock? SSRMs?
So while total numbers used isn't an indicator it's fine, it does mean people won't just go to ECM because it makes you instantly win. In fact, many builds aren't affected by ECM at all (my Cicada, in particular, does not discriminate.)
So we use that, suggestions, feedback, numbers gathered, watching 8v8's, etc, and eventually we come up with ideas. Then we test them. Tweak them. Test them. Tweak them. etc.
So while I'd love to tell you what changes we've made, none are in stone and until I have something to tell you that won't be wrong as of 9am the next day, I will.
I hope you all understand, we don't do this to be cruel, we do it because there is, quite literally, nothing of use to tell you yet, beyond that we've gathered our data, your suggestions, and are going through testing them now.
ECM being used on all ECM-able Mechs does show that it is overly powerful. The reason no changes have been made is it takes time to figure out what, exactly, is making that the reason. Is it the lock prevention? The 'cloak'? The range it works at? The weight? Crit space? Variants that use it? That it makes LRMs incapable of lock? SSRMs?
So while total numbers used isn't an indicator it's fine, it does mean people won't just go to ECM because it makes you instantly win. In fact, many builds aren't affected by ECM at all (my Cicada, in particular, does not discriminate.)
So we use that, suggestions, feedback, numbers gathered, watching 8v8's, etc, and eventually we come up with ideas. Then we test them. Tweak them. Test them. Tweak them. etc.
So while I'd love to tell you what changes we've made, none are in stone and until I have something to tell you that won't be wrong as of 9am the next day, I will.
I hope you all understand, we don't do this to be cruel, we do it because there is, quite literally, nothing of use to tell you yet, beyond that we've gathered our data, your suggestions, and are going through testing them now.
#166
Posted 17 January 2013 - 03:24 AM
siLve00, on 15 January 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:
i dont care about you.... serious ECM is fine...
The netcode is the problem.
The netcode is the problem.
this...
twibs, on 16 January 2013 - 05:25 PM, said:
plus the "new years podcast" on NGNG, where garth explains this as well... last week^^...
http://nogutsnogalax...happy-new-year/
starting at 17:22
information gathering...important not only on the battlefield
Edited by Adrienne Vorton, 17 January 2013 - 03:36 AM.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users