Jump to content

Mech Animation Behind Hitbox


4 replies to this topic

#1 Chunkylad

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 295 posts
  • LocationIn a place called reality.

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:36 PM

Been noticing that for faster mechs, the hitbox tends to be ahead of where the mech is actually displayed. This makes it horrid for focusing any point on a mech since I find myself firing into water 90% of the time just to register red on my crosshair and see damage splash across the mech. By far worst with light mechs, centi and dragon, but I have seen it happen on stalkers too.

#2 FrupertApricot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 669 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:42 PM

LOL founder JUST recognizing the lagshield? we've been playing with it for months!

#3 Rocket Puppy

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • 97 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:53 PM

I'm pretty sure that this is what is happening.

It actually happens in a lot of games, some times intentionally (like the hunter's hitbox in L4D2 is actually well ahead of the visible model when pouncing).

In MWO I think the wonky collision netcode is causing the hitbox to detach from the visible model.

#4 MiG77

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts
  • LocationThird tree from the left

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:57 PM

View PostRocket Puppy, on 17 January 2013 - 12:53 PM, said:


In MWO I think the wonky collision netcode is causing the hitbox to detach from the visible model.



No :D It simply is that you (as a player) just see in the past (target mech is not really there anymore). How much, depends on your latency and your opponent latency.

#5 Dakkath

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,980 posts
  • LocationG-14 Classified

Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:58 PM

This is being worked on, and its the #1 priority for the coders.
Referencing this post, and locking thread.
http://mwomercs.com/...36#entry1754136





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users