Anyone Actually Use The Cicada?
#21
Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:33 PM
#22
Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:22 PM
#23
Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:27 PM
#24
Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:43 PM
My results are varied because of unstable internet tho. It is a fun mech to mess around with, and it requires more thought to be successful with than just your standard brawler or AS7-D-DC
#25
Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:49 PM
I load it up with the engine when I have ECM frustrations because my puggers are all assuming everyone else will run ECM and I go 5 games without any (and get ruined). I know that I'm probably inviting a centurian or hunchback onto the other team but I can take most of them given enough time.
It's not a great mech. But the XL320 was great in dragons.
#26
Posted 24 January 2013 - 05:14 PM
I forget the model of my Cicada, but it's the one with 6 energy hardpoints. I run a xl340 engine, dbl heatsinks, been messing around with the weapons, between an ER PPC or a ERLargeLaser to 4MedLasers. I also keep a TAG on my mech. I have ferro-fibrous and endo steel armor. My normal top speed is 137.7 kph.
The role I put myself as is the light mech harrasser. I use 250 of my 274 or so available armor points. With that armor, I have actually made a commando run out of SSRM ammo on me. I can last in a fight against lights, and I can easily keep up with them, sometimes passing them up.
My speed makes me the constant threat on the field. I take potshots or get behind heavier mechs, because I have the manuverability and the speed to do so. I can circle-strafe mechs, but I can bail out of a fight if I need to. I also never overheat, because I don't load up all the points.
This is the mech to use if you want to be the counter-light mech. The TAG constantly helps LRM boats on my team, and I can constantly harass the light mechs. The other medium mechs do always pose a big threat to me, because they do have speed enough to keep me in range.
In all, I am happy with the Cicada.
Edited by Nubsternator, 24 January 2013 - 05:15 PM.
#27
Posted 24 January 2013 - 08:15 PM
#28
Posted 25 January 2013 - 05:05 AM
#29
Posted 25 January 2013 - 06:39 AM
Per a suggestion in another Cicada thread, I created Cicada builds based around the Large Laser. Wow, did that hit the jack pot. All my Cicada's have two Large Lasers and two Medium Lasers, and they are all fast.
I'm surprised the 2B has not been mentioned in this thread. This is the only variant with hardpoints in the arms. This gives the mech a much greater up/down firing arc. Ever run after an enemy mech up/down a hill yet find you can't raise or lower your crosshairs enough to target him? Well, just like a Jenner, the 2B can do that. Since the arms are so small compared to the rest of the mech, rarely do the arms get blown off.
Here are my two favorite builds:
CDA-2B
320XL (142kph w/ speed tweak)
ES
268 pts of FF
two LL
two ML
10 DHS
CDA-3M
305XL (136kph w/ speed tweak)
ECM
ES
268 pts of FF
two LL
two ML
10 DHS
EDIT: fix typos.
Edited by knnniggett, 25 January 2013 - 07:06 AM.
#30
Posted 25 January 2013 - 07:03 AM
Edited by StalaggtIKE, 25 January 2013 - 07:03 AM.
#31
Posted 25 January 2013 - 07:13 AM
StalaggtIKE, on 25 January 2013 - 07:03 AM, said:
Where are you finding the weight for that? Super slow engine? Paper armour?
Lots of firepower for an ECM medium, but I have to wonder if the trade-offs are worth it.
#32
Posted 25 January 2013 - 07:18 AM
Wrenchfarm, on 25 January 2013 - 07:13 AM, said:
Lots of firepower for an ECM medium, but I have to wonder if the trade-offs are worth it.
I am still able to achieve 100+kph and full armor, except for arms and legs. I'll try to post direct build once I get home. The trade offs are no lagshield and overheating if over zealous.
Edit:
Got home, here are my exact values: CDA-3M.
.
Edited by StalaggtIKE, 25 January 2013 - 05:42 PM.
#33
Posted 25 January 2013 - 07:37 AM
Indoorsman, on 24 January 2013 - 02:27 PM, said:
You can do this in a Jenner along with JJ's.
As for the Cicada: giant waste of a mechbay outside of competitive league games (such as RHOD).
It's just a big, slow, ugly Jenner without the ability to mount JJ's and bigger hitboxes.
The only reason to get one would be to buy the 3M and run it with ECM. paired with your scouts in certain league dropdecs to make sure your scouts don't get "outECM'd" and die an early, unnecessary death.
And even THIS will only be useful as long as there aren't other ECM capable mediums implemented into the game.
As soon as they are the Cicada will get no more love, unless the new medium has even crappier slots!
Edited by WaddeHaddeDudeda, 25 January 2013 - 07:38 AM.
#34
Posted 25 January 2013 - 09:57 AM
WaddeHaddeDudeda, on 25 January 2013 - 07:37 AM, said:
As for the Cicada: giant waste of a mechbay outside of competitive league games (such as RHOD).
It's just a big, slow, ugly Jenner without the ability to mount JJ's and bigger hitboxes.
The only reason to get one would be to buy the 3M and run it with ECM. paired with your scouts in certain league dropdecs to make sure your scouts don't get "outECM'd" and die an early, unnecessary death.
And even THIS will only be useful as long as there aren't other ECM capable mediums implemented into the game.
As soon as they are the Cicada will get no more love, unless the new medium has even crappier slots!
Well despite the Jenner being able to do it... you pointed out the reason to do it on a Cicada. It's a medium that's a light but doesn't get matched against lights. If you do some ridiculous build like double PPC on a Jenner you'll eventually have the enemy light taking you down.
I don't see how you can load the Jenner w/double PPC, JJ, 13 DHS and near max armor like my Cicada, or even double PPC w/13DHS high armor no JJ. This seems to be the closest you can get a Jenner to my Cicada build and it's only got 12 DHS:
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...9cd6ddb371a34c8
#35
Posted 25 January 2013 - 01:25 PM
I like to use the 300 XL engine. You get a healthy 121.5 speed and you can get almost anything you want on your mech. If you're inching to put a LB-X10, then I would get a ~280-300 XL engine.
About XL engines, I played plenty of games with the standard engine and I can tell you there isn't a big difference in your survival. With the extra tons you get from a XL engine, it far outweighs the disavantage of having the XL engine.
Edited by Lighthorn, 25 January 2013 - 01:25 PM.
#36
Posted 25 January 2013 - 01:40 PM
Personally, I own all of the variants.
They are pretty fun and maneuverable.
#40
Posted 28 January 2013 - 11:11 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users