3 replies to this topic

[Homeless Bill]

Let's face it: both modes are team deathmatch right now. The mode just changes where the fighting happens. Personally, I'm running more Conquest these days simply because CapWarrior Assault endings make me too sad for words. I also generally prefer the great diversity of fighting areas in Conquest.

I like the urban brawl instead of Ridgecamp 9000 on Frozen City, the way things tend to play out of Forest Colony, the diversity on Caustic, and the clash on River City (instead of A goes upper, B goes lower, CapWarrior engage).

Which have you been playing more often and why?

[Jasen]

cry more.


EDIT:

To clarify... this is obviously a thinly disguised cry thread about gamemodes.

I love conquest... We win quite often from capping.

Quit holding down W+M1 and you might understand the gamemode a little better.

Edited by Jasen, 24 January 2013 - 02:01 PM.

[Joseph Mallan]

You forgot the third option. Special snowflake!

[Homeless Bill]

Jasen, on 24 January 2013 - 01:56 PM, said:

cry more.


EDIT:

To clarify... this is obviously a thinly disguised cry thread about gamemodes.

I love conquest... We win quite often from capping.

Quit holding down W+M1 and you might understand the gamemode a little better.

This isn't a thinly-disguised cry thread. Do I think the game modes work how they should? No, but I'm a TDM kind of guy, so I'm perfectly happy with how things go most of the time. I made this thread because I'm curious why people are playing what they're playing.

Conquest rounds that end in capture are usually great matches, but do you really have more than one or two out of every ten end in capture? PUG or pre-made, it almost always boils down to kills from what I've seen (often with the team that split up and got the early point lead being wiped out because they were spread out).

I understand the game modes quite well; I simply prefer to mindlessly shoot at things. Thus my reasoning for why I like Conquest better.