

Were The Clans Right Or Wrong?
#1
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:10 AM
#2
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:17 AM
#3
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:30 AM
Oni Ralas, on 08 February 2013 - 09:10 AM, said:
The answer is something you must determine yourself, but I'm sure this could turn into a twenty page argument for both sides.
#4
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:38 AM
The Clans are no different. As in almost every one of the Battletech factions, they took some ideal and took it to extremes. The Clans represent Science and the ideals of the Warrior Race ethic stretched to the limit of what might be workable, bringing with that the merciless nature of both when uncontrolled by concern for life. Thus, the Clans have both the virtues of honor and service to their people, but also the blind belief that their ways cannot be wrong and that Man's science will produce the most perfect society.
In that they invade the Inner Sphere and, for all intents and purposes, seek to enslave the rest of Humanity to their way of life through force of arms, they were set up to be the 'bad guys'. But also, by being portrayed as striving to be above petty corruption and a seeking of personal property, they were meant to throw into relief the faults of the Inner Sphere, who have spent centuries squandering their resources and people in attempts to gain power.
#5
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:40 AM
#6
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:52 AM
That pretty much sums up all morality in BT.
#7
Posted 08 February 2013 - 10:00 AM
A despotic, fractured, back stabbing, monarchic society that bombed themselves almost back to the Stone Age doesn't sound like a good guy either.
Huh, maybe BT didn't have any real good guys or bad guys...
#8
Posted 08 February 2013 - 10:26 AM
While the crussaders try to unite the IS by force, the wardens see themselfs as the last defense of humanity against outer foes, and hope to be called back to the IS as the only legitimate army. Quite good intentions i think.
As a society, all clans are described as a fascist caste society, wich doesnt sound all that funny. The personell freedom of clanners varies from clan to clan though; and also does from IS nation to nation.
So, in my opinion: crussaders more on the unfriendly side, wardens missunderstood with good intentions.
#9
Posted 08 February 2013 - 11:20 AM
I'm the guy with the AC/20.

----
That has always been my favorite aspect of the Battletech Lore - the various factions were not at all one-dimensional. There wasn't "the totalitarian regime vs. the plucky rebels" theme AT ALL. There were fairly well thought out governments and regional politics and, as stated, nobody was devoid of a little dirt beneath their fingernails, or skeletons in their closet.
Edited by Kraven Kor, 08 February 2013 - 11:20 AM.
#10
Posted 08 February 2013 - 11:21 AM
Except for the Word of Blake, those guys come with doctorates from the university of evil.
#11
Posted 08 February 2013 - 11:22 AM
Clan Wolf on the other hand set itself up for heavy fighting in order spare the civilian population of one planet.
There are both good and bad clans, it's kind of like saying all "Russians are bad," I'm not saying Russians are bad (some of my best friends are Russian). But saying all Clans are bad is along those same lines.
Basically there are 2 mindsets to the clans; Warden and Crusader. The Wardens believe they should be the protectors of the Innersphere and should not interfere with it. The Cusaders believe it is their birthright to liberate the Inner Sphere and reform the Star League by any means necessary.
#12
Posted 08 February 2013 - 11:26 AM
#13
Posted 08 February 2013 - 12:05 PM
Wussy Falcons or Brave Wolves?
#14
Posted 08 February 2013 - 11:53 PM
#15
Posted 09 February 2013 - 12:17 AM
Read a bit of lore, browse through the sarna and decide for yourself. You may find you align better with one side or another, and then you can jump into the ongoing and never ending debate of who is the superior group =P
#16
Posted 09 February 2013 - 12:32 AM
Listless Nomad, on 08 February 2013 - 10:00 AM, said:
A despotic, fractured, back stabbing, monarchic society that bombed themselves almost back to the Stone Age doesn't sound like a good guy either.
Huh, maybe BT didn't have any real good guys or bad guys...
Well, maybe not a lot of good guys.
But there are definitely some bad guys.
And yes, all this stuff is super arguable. Which is what makes it awesome! One of my first experience with BT lore was reading a thread by a Marik talking about why he was a Marik. And soon everybody was joining in, saying why they love their House/Clan. I'm a Davion. In real life, would I be a wholehearted supporter of all things Davion? Probably not. 4th Succession War was kind of a travesty. But they appeal the most to my idea of right and wrong, so I like them.
#17
Posted 09 February 2013 - 08:32 AM

#19
Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:26 AM
Oni Ralas, on 08 February 2013 - 09:10 AM, said:
Trying to stop the Succession Wars and restore peace and harmony in the Inner Sphere, a noble goal.
Blazing a path of death and destruction towards Terra, not exactly the best course of action in my mind. However it probably makes perfect sense for an elitist warrior caste who handles pretty much everything through violence.
At its core though, the Clans weren't coming back to the Inner Sphere with any lofty goals of stopping the wars and starting a new era of peace and harmony. It was about a desire to become the ilClan, the clan in charge of all other clans, this was a power-grab and not much more. So I am hard pressed to consider the invading clans as anything but 'the bad guys'. That being said Nova Cat, WiE, and Ghost Bear decided to just integrate back into the IS which I feel is a bit more noble than the rest of them
#20
Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:44 AM
Oni Ralas, on 08 February 2013 - 09:10 AM, said:
Good guys. I'm not bias here...

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users