Awesome Is Having Its Day
#1
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:17 PM
#2
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:30 PM
#3
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:32 PM
#4
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:34 PM
QQ has an excellent Awesome pilot and Glock was the guy who made the Awesome seem viable.
So yeah...
#5
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:35 PM
#6
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:35 PM
But its not really having its day, The $hitty babby is a poor waste of nearly 30 bucks.
#7
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:38 PM
Edited by Roughneck45, 10 February 2013 - 05:39 PM.
#8
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:41 PM
Overall, I don't think the Baby (which I use as a beefed up 2X) and the 8Q ( which I use as a beefed up 1X) gives me any absolute advantage over using my good old Cataphracts and I don't see very big difference in results (been bagging about 3 kills per match with my cataphracts, i dun think awesomes will let me bag 5 per match? LOL)
Edited by Pr8Dator, 10 February 2013 - 05:43 PM.
#9
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:43 PM
Roughneck45, on 10 February 2013 - 05:38 PM, said:
That and the much better torso twist for the Awesome - while it still doesn't hit as hard or tank quite as well as either of the other assaults, it's now a little more flexible in a brawl, and with faster rotation speed it acquires targets quite quickly when sniping. Overall, it's a nice bridge between the heavy class and the bigger assaults.
#10
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:50 PM
Its all about playing up to your strengths.
#11
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:51 PM
I also have 3 Dragons and 4 Phracts and a Foundy-catty (would have preferred a Dragon, tbh).
Glad for the engine cap buff the Awesome just had, and the 'Baby is the first Hero that i've wanted.
Saving for my second AWS as we 'speak' while i grind up my DRG's again.
The AWS and DRG are similar in that they work best piloted as the weight class below +5.
Kinda like the Cicada.
That's a +5 mech, too.
GO AWESOME, YOU'RE...er...REALLY GOOD.
Edited by Snowcaller, 10 February 2013 - 05:56 PM.
#12
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:53 PM
Edited by kilgor, 10 February 2013 - 05:59 PM.
#13
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:53 PM
#14
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:53 PM
#15
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:25 PM
#16
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:26 PM
Spinning Burr, on 10 February 2013 - 06:25 PM, said:
Read them again. There's a huge section on it.
#17
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:43 PM
#18
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:47 PM
#19
Posted 10 February 2013 - 06:53 PM
#20
Posted 10 February 2013 - 07:00 PM
17 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 17 guests, 0 anonymous users