Ralen Sharr, on 05 July 2012 - 10:17 AM, said:
the original designs are what infringe on the copyright
that's why they have "reseen" versions
the reseen designs are fine to use
Bodha, on 05 July 2012 - 11:30 AM, said:
you seem to be missing the point. The original artwork was stolen from another franchise. If you steal something you dont simply get to say sorry and keep using it unless the person you stole from is very forgiving.
The solution that worked was making new artwork for these mechs, but as you can see many people fell in love with the original stuff and complain heavily about the new artwork. Easiest solution for mechwarrior has been to let the drama rage on and just avoid having the mechs in the game at all.
IF they ever bring these old mechs back it will be with the redesigned artwork.
IF they do the forums will be months of people complaining.
Devs are basically in one of those damned if they do and damned if they don't situations. So probably just decide to spend development resources on mechs that dont have the drama attached to them.
Personally I hope they just keep pushing out more mechs at a rapid pace. I don't really care if they bring back the marauder, archer, thunderbolt, warhammer, and all the other unseen. I would play them if available, and I won't be upset if they dont make it in. I will be upset if the mech selection and variety isn't expanding regularly along with a regular expansion of the maps/arenas to fight in.
What would really make me happy? If the dev's put out a map design toolset and let players make maps that they polish up.
ScrapIron Prime, on 05 July 2012 - 12:51 PM, said:
Intellectual Property rights don't work that way in the US. once you let people start using them, they rapidly devolve into public domain. So you need to slap people with cease and desist lawsuits or forever lose your revenue stream. More or less.
DeathGuardOO14, on 05 July 2012 - 12:55 PM, said:
I'm not gonna disagree, but is HG really doing anything with them? Prolly not, and they could be making more money if they allowed the unseens use in MWO. Like I said though, if it were that easy they would do it.
Yoseful Mallad, on 05 July 2012 - 12:58 PM, said:
I guess you haven't been paying attention? Even if they do give us these mech in this game, what would make you think they would have to give harmony gold or any of the other companies those unseen first designs came from anything at all? AGAIN... As long as those designs are not used, then there is no problems. And the names like warhammer, marauder, Rifelman and so on can be used as those are not copy written by Harmony gold or anyone else. The names can be put on new redesigned mech.
Belorion, on 05 July 2012 - 02:26 PM, said:
This thread is jam packed full of missinformation.
None of the images were ever stollen. They were licensed for use. FASA made the decision to pull the images preimptively, and let the license lapse.
Harmony gold only has licensing rights to mech images originating from the Macross series. They are:
Stinger
Wasp
Valkyrie
Phoenix Hawk
Crusader
Hornet
Ostroc
Ostsol
Ostscout
Archer
Warhammer
Rifleman
Longbow
Marauder
Marauder II
Making some Mechs that were unseen in the clear for release. There are rumors that even the Macross images have been cleared.
Elkarlo, on 05 July 2012 - 04:32 PM, said:
And you got it
WRONG
Locust
Griffin
Shadow Hawk
Thunderbolt
Scorpion
Wolverine
Battlemaster
Are reseen, and we may get them. They are again part of the BT license !
The Macross mech's too for everyone not in the US, as in US is the ROBOTECH License by Golden Harmony.
( Macross is International and they got the License into the BT license but in the US Market Golden Harmony made a seperate License out of Macross called Robotech, and the Robotech license is the Problem with out beloved Mech's)
The funny thing is that Ral Partha produced the Macross Mech till around 1999 or 2000 for the European Market, but where forbade to import to US. In Europe it was legal, because Macross didn't block the Mech's.
Maybe when we get the European Server i will get my Warhammer
.
Atomfire, on 05 July 2012 - 05:08 PM, said:
You have durpped hard, Harmony lost the rights last year.
Volthorne, on 13 November 2012 - 12:28 AM, said:
Copyright infringement would specifically refer to the "unseen" issue, concerning whoever suing whoever over images being "too similar" to another IP. Licensing agreements specifically dictate the conditions that you may use an IP in, and what you may use it for.
Also 20% is not as much as you think it may be. Nearly all of the Unseen could be re-released with only minor tweaking. People like to go overboard, though, so when something needs redesigning.... "Re-do ALL the things!"
A LOT OF MISINFORMATION SO FAR:
Fasa licensed the art directly from Studio Nue in Japan a year before HG licensed Super Dimensional Fortress Macross from Tatsunoko. Studio Nue is the studio that did the anime shows where the mechs appeared in. Not a single case brought against Fasa for the original art was ever won by HG. The only suit that Fasa lost was against Playmates over the Mad Cat design.
It took the Japanese courts twenty years to resolve the issues surrounding the copyrights for SDFM between Studio Nue and Tatsunoko. In the end, the Japanese courts, in 2002, ruled that Studio Nue owns the copyrights to mecha and character designs while Tatsunoko only owns the copyrights to SDFM series. The end result of all this is that HG does not have a valid license for the mecha and character designs from SDFM, but Fasa did. Tatsunoko cannot license something they do not own and as far as I know Studio Nue hasn't licensed the designs to HG either.
What this means that under the Berne Convention, Japan, Canada, and the US are signatories to, that HG is out of luck if they attempt to sue or are sued by a North American company as the Japanese ruling is admissible in a US or Canadian court. HG does not have a legal leg to stand on since they received their license for the mechs and characters from Tatsunoko not Studio Nue.
Keep on thinking that HG is in the right when the legal cases and facts say different. It just makes you look foolish.
The long and the short of all this is that PGI could put in the original designs for the Unseen as long as they get a license from Studio Nue for them. Fasa never stole anything and had a legal license to use the art. HG used deep pocket legal bullying to force Fasa to drop the art because they were in the wrong. HG are the ones that infringed upon Studio Nue's copyrights and continue to do so.
Edited by James The Fox Dixon, 13 November 2012 - 02:09 AM.