Rippthrough, on 23 February 2013 - 07:14 AM, said:
Yep, they do, more about amount of games than actual performance, no?
This argument is, no offense, frivolous.
If someone who played this game could achieve a 10:1 W/L ratio over a period of time, then they'd be at the top of the list.
Let's use a hypothetical, shall we?
Two players have equal ELO, they've been solo-dropping for the most part.
Player A is currently ranked #10 in this tournament for the Heavy Class.
Player B is currently ranked #50 in this tournament for the Assault Class.
Player A has played 60 games, having won 35 of them and having lost 25.
Player B has played 10 games, having won all of them.
Now try and figure out if Player B is actually a better player than Player A, or if Player B simply got 4-man's on his side every time/competent pubs.
If Player A had lost all 25 games but got 7 kills each game, it wouldn't matter at all to any of you since the argument would simply shift back to "Well the guy who played more games only topped because he played more games!" Duh?
This isn't a ladder tournament, there isn't brackets determining who is pitted against who in single combat and so on.