Mercules, on 26 February 2013 - 12:16 PM, said:
Yes, you and SIXSIXSIX are on opposite ends of the discussion and I am in the middle trying to let both ends know that Elo isn't fully functioning yet as per the Dev post. I've been telling him to knock it off it isn't doing what he thinks it is. Elo is random as hell right now but the only way for it to get better is for us to play in it and let our scores balance out.
GIVE.... IT.... TIME....
FYI, know what happens when a bunch of people decide to "give it time?" They get frustrated, give up, and leave "until it gets better." ELO doesn't fix itself, so it never gets better, and we get a dead game. Know what PGI should've done if we needed to give ELO more time to sort itself?
THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE IMPLEMENTED ELO UNTIL THERE WAS ENOUGH DATA TO SORT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
















