Jump to content

Thanks, But No Thanks


127 replies to this topic

#101 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:19 AM

View PostExoth3rmic, on 27 February 2013 - 01:17 AM, said:

When you come back (and you will) please play a bit more and post a bit less.

You've made mutliple threads, elicited multiple responses and simply disagreed with everyone. This is not the picture of a reasonable mind.


Pssst, I'll let you in on a little secret. OP is a troll.

Posted Image

#102 Exoth3rmic

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 434 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:21 AM

View PostThirdstar, on 27 February 2013 - 01:19 AM, said:


Pssst, I'll let you in on a little secret. OP is a troll.



101 replies to this topic.

Now we know right! And if he wasn't intending to be such - now he is right? I mean, what use is there posting any more in any of the threads he enters? Oh noes my mind is blown.

#103 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:25 AM

View PostExoth3rmic, on 27 February 2013 - 01:21 AM, said:


101 replies to this topic.

Now we know right! And if he wasn't intending to be such - now he is right? I mean, what use is there posting any more in any of the threads he enters? Oh noes my mind is blown.


Posted Image

10/10 would read anything OP has to say again.

#104 Erasus Magnus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 383 posts
  • LocationUnited States Of Mind

Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:58 AM

View PostBigBadHarv, on 26 February 2013 - 04:52 PM, said:


i didnt start with flames, i described exactly what a large portion of gamers are like. its not my fault they took offence to it. its not like im wrong either.
run along till im what? able to tolerate being locked in with a bunch of morons i wouldnt **** on if they were on fire? as the thread says, thanks but no thanks :)
(on a side note it is nice that my description has brought out so many of you and look, hey presto! you are acting and saying the same things. have a look through the thread to find other versions of you :) )


http://en.wikipedia....93Kruger_effect

Edited by Erasus Magnus, 27 February 2013 - 02:03 AM.


#105 Batabusa

    Rookie

  • Knight Errant
  • 2 posts
  • LocationTrondheim, Norway

Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:45 AM

Ok. This video is about a different games' ELO system, BUT you should watch and learn. Really.

#106 Boymonkey

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 772 posts
  • LocationUK Yorkshire (from Manchester)

Posted 27 February 2013 - 03:06 AM

So the OP is to old to play games? Did you know the average age of a gamer is 35? Iam nearly 40 and have been a gamer for 32 years and hope to play for another 32 years at least.
OP just take a break I did (about a month) played another game and have come back bright eyed and bushy tailed and loving MWO again.

#107 Dashiell Hammett

    Member

  • Pip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 14 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:57 AM

OP has been added to the Kill on Sight: Regardless of Team List. Purely for his smarmy use of emoji.

#108 1BigFool

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 72 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:19 AM

Are we still responding to this topic? I thought he was leaving?

#109 Badconduct

    Dezgra

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 364 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:20 AM

View Post1BigFool, on 27 February 2013 - 05:19 AM, said:

Are we still responding to this topic? I thought he was leaving?


He hasn't responded with anything whitty yet, we're all waiting.

#110 Kraven Kor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 5,434 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:32 AM

View PostDashiell Hammett, on 27 February 2013 - 04:57 AM, said:

OP has been added to the Kill on Sight: Regardless of Team List. Purely for his smarmy use of emoji.


Yes, because getting yourself banned for teamkilling will help so much ;)

#111 Stoicblitzer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,931 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:33 AM

View PostOne Medic Army, on 26 February 2013 - 04:21 PM, said:

So what I'm getting from the OP is that you dislike Elo.
You dislike it because instead of matching you randomly against people and letting you win a large portion of the games due to superior skill the system is instead placing you against equally skilled players and/or placing you with less skilled players in an attempt to make you lose 50% of your games regardless.
So this all comes down to you feel Elo is unfair in that it constantly increases the challenge you encounter until you have a good chance of losing.

Now that that's out of the way: if this is truly the way you feel you should leave and not coma back until CW is in and there is an absolute metric to measure yourself against.
Just stop playing with the current Elo, as it's not and never will be what you want out of this game, wait until there's something else here.

Now personally I enjoy Elo. I enjoy it because I care less about winning or losing than having a good close fight. I enjoy the challenge.
You don't apparently.

This is pretty much what my critical reading skills deduced also.

#112 CygnusX7

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,803 posts
  • LocationA desolate moon circling a desolate planet

Posted 27 February 2013 - 07:48 AM

Among other things, condescending comes to mind.

#113 Kdogg788

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,314 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 08:04 AM

Can someone explain what the point was of the original post because I don't get it? So he's not enjoying the game, whatever, move along...

-k

#114 Mavqie

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 116 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 12:04 PM

View PostKdogg788, on 27 February 2013 - 08:04 AM, said:

Can someone explain what the point was of the original post because I don't get it? So he's not enjoying the game, whatever, move along...

-k


yes but he just had to let us know first so we would miss him...

#115 BigBadHarv

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 114 posts
  • LocationDublin

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:35 PM

View PostEgoSlayer, on 26 February 2013 - 07:10 PM, said:


OK BigBadHarv I'll bite.
Please explain to me how having a completely fracking random (CFR) match maker that only works by 'Hey these 16 people clicked launch at about the same time' provides a better match than one using logic based on player skill/history?

Please enlighten me, I would really like to know the answer. Because all the ELO haters seem to think it was better. With CFR matchmaking you are more likely to get the "dribblers" because statistically there are going to be more of them in the pool than the elite pilots. So how is luck not a factor in CFR mode?

Sync drops is not a valid answer because even with ELO you can group with your friends and drop together, you just can't drop against each other. But this last point is going to be addressed in future updates which removes the sync drop argument entirely.


hey, sorry long day, then the forums went down :s
heres my problems with elo-
#1 cheese to win. because of the nature of elo, players are now going to take their best/most broken builds far more often. sure, players were doing that before but the percentage of those that do is going to be far higher now. instead of being able to have fun and mess about with different builds its simply going to be "oh your team hasn't got x, y & z? gg you lose"

#2 its inaccurate. the system itself is designed for one player versus one player. its used in quakelive for duelling and its really accurate there, thats because its being employed the way it was meant to be. in any team system it becomes more and more skewed the more players you add. launching solo in MWO right now is a matter of luck. if you get the team, you win and your elo gets higher. it doesnt matter if you are a blind leper in a mech, you will still gain points because your team won for you, or you could be tiger woods in a mech and still lose because the rest of your team are busy running into walls and such. for solo queue, your elo will be luck. LoL is a 5v5 game and it was skewed to sh*t there, MWO is currently 8v8 and will probably get bigger. luck doesnt even out, its a variable and impossible to graph and i dont want who i play with on my team decided by a deeply flawed system. i would much rather the games be blind luck as to who is on my team with no consequences if you win or lose.

#3 it breeds a toxic atmosphere. gamers are a curious bunch, especially on the internet where truth and facts can be skewed so easily. for example, I'm Tom Cruise. you can't prove I'm not Tom Cruise unless you go to extreme effort. elo ups the pressure on people and gamers react to pressure very very badly. I have seen it across tons of games (even in quakelive where elo is a good thing for duels) where players consistently freak out because the reality they have created around themselves has been broken. I have a friend irl who plays LoL, he isn't good at the game but im often in his house and watch him play. its an amazing thing to witness, the chatlog is just insane. everyone is freaked out, everyone on the losing team is flaming each other, everyone on the winning team is flaming the losing team, trolling happens in *every* game. i know LoL is an extreme example but honestly, thats not how i want to spend my free time. It was the same thing in HoN (where all a players stats are publicly available, k/d etc) - players where bullied into the ground for 40+ minutes. thats the atmosphere elo creates and unless MWO can be the exception to the rule then the same thing will happen to this game, or at least close to it.

------

now, I only realised in work today that i made a big mistake in my original post which is maybe why a lot of ppl railed against it quite badly :s i *didn't* mean everyone that disagrees with me are the type of undesirables described. What I meant by it was, that the people getting angry at what i was saying for no reason other then the fact that someone might dare say they are wasting themselves away by chasing the elo dream, are the exact type of people that make gaming insufferable. the people getting angry simply because they feel threatened that the illusions they have built around themselves are in fact wafer thin and if anyone dares contest that, they will feel the rage/troll.
Im sorry if it did annoy people that are simply disagreeing with me. I didn't intend the message to be taken by that and its my fault. as i said it was rather self indulgent, but I do stand by it as regards the undesirables and how they think and just how poisonous they are.


this said, i did play 2 games tonight. first one, lost 8 - 1 by a team far more organised and with obviously far better players. won the 2nd 7 - 3 (base cap) against a team that was poorly organised but did contain some good players. it was luck whether i landed with the good or the bad team and i would have won/lost the exact same depending on which i was on. elo had nothing to do with it

#116 The Cheese

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 2,558 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, Australia

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:49 PM

View PostBigBadHarv, on 27 February 2013 - 04:35 PM, said:

#1 cheese to win.

So what? the people that win all the time because they only ever play the best builds are going to have a high ELO, and the people that just kinda screw around for fun with whatever build they like are going to have a medium/low ELO. Once the system settles in, they probably aren't going to play against each other very often.

View PostBigBadHarv, on 27 February 2013 - 04:35 PM, said:

#2 its inaccurate.

An imperfect system is better than no system at all.

View PostBigBadHarv, on 27 February 2013 - 04:35 PM, said:

#3 it breeds a toxic atmosphere. gamers are a curious bunch, especially on the internet where truth and facts can be skewed so easily. for example, I'm Tom Cruise. you can't prove I'm not Tom Cruise unless you go to extreme effort. elo ups the pressure on people and gamers react to pressure very very badly. I have seen it across tons of games (even in quakelive where elo is a good thing for duels) where players consistently freak out because the reality they have created around themselves has been broken. I have a friend irl who plays LoL, he isn't good at the game but im often in his house and watch him play. its an amazing thing to witness, the chatlog is just insane. everyone is freaked out, everyone on the losing team is flaming each other, everyone on the winning team is flaming the losing team, trolling happens in *every* game. i know LoL is an extreme example but honestly, thats not how i want to spend my free time. It was the same thing in HoN (where all a players stats are publicly available, k/d etc) - players where bullied into the ground for 40+ minutes. thats the atmosphere elo creates and unless MWO can be the exception to the rule then the same thing will happen to this game, or at least close to it.

The hell? Tom Cruise?

#117 Tarman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,080 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:52 PM

View PostBigBadHarv, on 27 February 2013 - 04:35 PM, said:


-stuff that sounded way moar rational than the starting post



This could actually fuel a discussion about its content instead of its delivery. Much classier dude.

#118 Jetfire

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,746 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:03 PM

Umm, what? The ELO system seems to be balancing matches much better than they used to be in random drops. How is the current system worse than the previous? MM3 will be followed by MM4, then MM5... etc. How exactly were they to balance skill if not ELO?

Edited by Jetfire, 27 February 2013 - 05:03 PM.


#119 FerretGR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,445 posts

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:03 PM

View PostBigBadHarv, on 27 February 2013 - 04:35 PM, said:

#3 it breeds a toxic atmosphere.


As opposed to the decidedly non-toxic atmosphere you get when you throw total noobs to the elite wolves?

#120 Felicitatem Parco

    Professor of Memetics

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,522 posts
  • LocationIs Being Obscured By ECM

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:08 PM

This thread is being Jettisoned form the General Discussion. The OP was written in such a way that ignored the upcoming Meta Game and concluded that MW:O is just and will always be a matchmaking fest. Second, the thread is full of personal arguments and non-constructive stuff.



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users