We Need A Better Selection Of Medium Mechs.
#41
Posted 01 March 2013 - 11:59 PM
#43
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:01 AM
Edward Steiner, on 01 March 2013 - 11:50 PM, said:
The latter group will have two D-DDCs, 4 3Ls and two Streak boat commandos, the mediums will have little chance unless they have a large number of ECM Cicadas.
We do need a 55 ton mech though, but I don't think that there are any non-clan 55 ton mediums that are not unseen mechs available in 3050.
You say that, but how many situations have you seen a bunch of Medium mechs go against a bunch of Light mechs that are out numbered?
It's all speculation but I really think it would "feel" much more balanced in this scenario. Even with Ravens and Commandos with ECM vs non-ECM Mediums, that much direct-fire at any Light will make it go down quickly. Especially if there is an ECM Cicada or TAG wielder to focus on a target.
#44
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:04 AM
#45
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:07 AM
Corpsecandle, on 01 March 2013 - 02:39 PM, said:
Yes, a bit more tweaking to make aiming and shooting with them as well as ducking through cover as smooth as possible and people will definitely like the playstyle.
#46
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:13 AM
Zyllos, on 01 March 2013 - 02:27 PM, said:
Mediums will become much better once weight limits and more weapon balances are introduced.
With a 400t limit, do you take 8 50t Medium mechs or 2 Atlas, 4 Ravens, and 2 Commandos?
While I think most "conventional" thinking groups would go with the later option, some groups will begin to take the former option in an attempt to out manuver the high fire power of the 2 Atlas' and take out the Lights.
Zyllos, on 01 March 2013 - 02:27 PM, said:
Mediums will become much better once weight limits and more weapon balances are introduced.
With a 400t limit, do you take 8 50t Medium mechs or 2 Atlas, 4 Ravens, and 2 Commandos?
While I think most "conventional" thinking groups would go with the later option, some groups will begin to take the former option in an attempt to out manuver the high fire power of the 2 Atlas' and take out the Lights.
I would love my drop to be 8 mix of cent-D and treb-C at 125+ against that!
edit: if my team hits with its srms we roll!
Edited by Johnny Reb, 02 March 2013 - 12:43 AM.
#47
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:19 AM
Kraven Kor, on 01 March 2013 - 03:13 PM, said:
And I still just can't understand why they don't just scrap the artwork that is in IP Hell, use the name and description and make new art of the mech itself.
It's not just a Warhammer that looks like a Destroid that'll get them sued. Harmony Gold don't want a Mech called a 'Warhammer' fullstop. As an example.
#48
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:29 AM
ConairSinclor, on 02 March 2013 - 12:22 AM, said:
only the HBK.
The cicade is a glorified light.
Most of the hunchies are turds.
The trebuchet has the worse slots
And the cent is made of paper.
Please. give better medimums
Disagree:
The Cent-D and Treb-3C are both proper mediums that can stay with lights. I.E. great light hunters (not the old fast swayback but viable) They are also great hit and run mechs. That said, there are better mechs to run instead (heavies) and unless tonnage, tourney limits or BV (really hope not) are introduced then they are gimped. However, I will still run them in pugs.
#49
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:30 AM
Phoenix Hawk, Shadowhawk, Wolverine, Griffin.
But those won't ever show up in the game. So we are limited to second line fire support mechs and specialized chassis.
Hunchback --> Dedicated to City fights
Trebuchet --> LRM firesupport Mech
Centurion --> Was constructed as companion for the Trebuchet / constructed as Bodyguard
Cicada --> LMFAO.....the only reason you can drive a Cicada is the Mechlab
Blackjak --> AK LR firesupport Mech
Quite annoying
#50
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:33 AM
The Basilisk, on 02 March 2013 - 12:30 AM, said:
Phoenix Hawk, Shadowhawk, Wolverine, Griffin.
But those won't ever show up in the game. So we are limited to second line fire support mechs and specialized chassis.
Hunchback --> Dedicated to City fights
Trebuchet --> LRM firesupport Mech
Centurion --> Was constructed as companion for the Trebuchet / constructed as Bodyguard
Cicada --> LMFAO.....the only reason you can drive a Cicada is the Mechlab
Blackjak --> AK LR firesupport Mech
Quite annoying
The Basilisk, on 02 March 2013 - 12:30 AM, said:
Phoenix Hawk, Shadowhawk, Wolverine, Griffin.
But those won't ever show up in the game. So we are limited to second line fire support mechs and specialized chassis.
Hunchback --> Dedicated to City fights
Trebuchet --> LRM firesupport Mech
Centurion --> Was constructed as companion for the Trebuchet / constructed as Bodyguard
Cicada --> LMFAO.....the only reason you can drive a Cicada is the Mechlab
Blackjak --> AK LR firesupport Mech
Quite annoying
This is not "TT"!
I have made my Cent-D and Treb-C fast skirmishers/scout hunters. Mechs in real time have no preset role, only the role you make for it, that you can.
edit: sry about the dbl posts on both my mouse is going and it doesnt show up till its done.
Edited by Johnny Reb, 02 March 2013 - 12:34 AM.
#51
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:37 AM
#52
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:37 AM
Any kind of tonnage limitation or battle value balancing or Community Warfare resource limits will do wonders to make mediums appealing, but given the option of any mech, there isn't much use.
Is we had, say, a Dervish with 4 SRM6 and JJs, it would utterly control the medium position. 55 tons is one of the really optimal tonnages to build at, and the Dervish is a good mech to use.
#53
Posted 02 March 2013 - 12:54 AM
works for the cent D
works for the cent A
works for the hbk 4SP
works for most of the trebs
or if you run in teams and are confident in your ecm cover, you can take streaks instead and try to help your lights get early light mech superiority. can sometimes use the extra tonnage for mplas too if you're hunting lights
#54
Posted 02 March 2013 - 02:17 AM
Protection, on 02 March 2013 - 12:37 AM, said:
Dervish sure is dreamy isn't it? IIRC it doesn't have a 3rd variant suitable for this time period, oh well.
#55
Posted 02 March 2013 - 02:31 AM
I have a slow 80kph Cicada with a AC/20 on it its my assassin I let guys go in and bruise them up and I blow them up. from behind. Ohh that cat and atlas are retreating let me go solve that.
I have a treb that is 3 mls 3 SSRMs I find a raven and follow it around because those 5 SSRM combined is evil.
No yes the stock variants are harder to play but then can work if you understand what the mech was meant for.
#56
Posted 02 March 2013 - 03:00 AM
Mr TeaTime, on 02 March 2013 - 12:19 AM, said:
It's not just a Warhammer that looks like a Destroid that'll get them sued. Harmony Gold don't want a Mech called a 'Warhammer' fullstop. As an example.
Well they only had the rights to Macross, so while they could stop someone from calling a mech a Destroid or a Tomahawk (the Macross name for the Warhammer) I don't think they could stop someone from using a name unrelated to that property, like the Warhammer in question. If they also created a new mech design Harmony Gold wouldn't have anything to sue about. The whole problem with the Unseen was the artwork that HG had rights too, not the names that FASA gave to them.
#57
Posted 02 March 2013 - 03:05 AM
More mechs would be nice, only have the Hunchback and Raven so far and no other mechs available or on the horizon appeal to me enough to buy more bays yet. Jagermech? pff..
#58
Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:18 PM
Edited by Sephlock, 02 March 2013 - 05:21 PM.
#59
Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:29 PM
Edited by Kassatsu, 02 March 2013 - 05:32 PM.
#60
Posted 03 March 2013 - 06:00 PM
Alphawolf, on 01 March 2013 - 11:52 PM, said:
That's half of it. Mediums are cheap. The other half of it is that drop weight matters. If they ever make a draft mode based on BV or drop limits you'll probably see a whole lot more mediums show up. The third issue it really logistics. You couldn't rely on having specialist heavies or assaults everywhere so you made do with the mediums that are jacks of all trades. Maybe we'll see some of that in community warfare?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users






















