I'm asking this because back when I first starting playing this, when open beta opened up, I saved up cbills and bought the D. Reasons I'll explain in a moment, but I bought the D, and then my friends stopped playing so I stopped as well. I'm trying to get back into it and I was looking up serious builds, and all the builds say that D-DC is superior, but no one really states why. I really don't want to think I've wasted all that time getting my D, but I just cannot grasp why the D-DC WOULD be better.
The only noticeable difference that I can see is 2 less energy, 1 more missile, and command console? Sure, 4 energy slots can be grounds for overheating, but just manage well and its fine. My current build for my D is as follows:
2 Med Las
2 Lg Las
2 Srm 4
2 U AC/5
Double heat sinks
C.A.S.E.
325 Engine
Endo
Most builds I see for the D-DC contain
2 Lg Las
3 Srm4/6
2 U AC/5 / Gauss etc...
Double Heat sinks
325 Engine
Endo
ECM
Is ECM really that big of a deal? I never have an issue seeing someone on the field who has ECM (heat vision is beautiful) and also, you really think you can hide an atlas. Really. Yeah, ok buddy. I don't see your giant *** nugget from across the map.
I don't understand. Is 1 more srm really that much better than 2 more energy? And I've seen a few builds where they don't even use the missile slots. Why'd you get the DC then? You aren't using it's seemingly only strength over a D. I can put almost every build I've seen on a DC on my D. The only difference? I get one less missile slot. Yeah ok. I just balance that out with a case or ams and some ammo.
Please explain to me why the DC is considered to be superior. I hope it isn't as everyone makes it out to be, because I really don't want to feel like I wasted all those cbills.
Edited by Octave, 02 March 2013 - 04:32 PM.