Jump to content

The Mwo Game Fails?


50 replies to this topic

#1 JDante

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 209 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 02:47 AM

Dear developers. I think, like many players, I have a choice of about 4-5 games of this type, like you, and the world of tanks that are actively developing.

I am a fan of the combat robots since childhood, of Microsoft games, books and other artributy, so I was very interested in promoting the MBO.

Unfortunately the comparison is not in our favor. The cost should also be noted that many of the players becomes annoying system "play for free" when in fact advertising and forcing invest points in the game throughout.

Of course for the thanks can not eat, and it is clear that any work should be rewarded.

But dear command will developers, unfortunately at the moment there are 3 things that spoil Projects simply incredible. About them and I would like to say.

1) MWO far behind the competition in terms of not function, developed and opportunities, as well a variety of patches make too little of interest in the basic rules of balance without new ideas.

2) VERY becomes annoying abundance of advertising against the omission of paragraph 1. Guys make the game better money itself will come, but we do not need to poke shares every day, looks petty.

3) The third point comes from the first two, the authority of the game drops, it seems that the developers have pulled out of the game, all monetary juices and Projects is about to close or zakrytiyu.K addition, many are worried that soon the game will be "pay to win."


Please pay attention to these problems and take decisive action, it is in your best interest.

#2 Sean von Steinike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,880 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 12 March 2013 - 02:52 AM

All your base, are belong to us.

#3 lizardmech

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 82 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 02:57 AM

I am also a fan of the Combat robots since childhood.
The combat robots since childhood franchise will certainly succeed.

#4 Idolo

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 46 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:02 AM

I think i gave myself a brain injury reading that.

#5 TheCaptainJZ

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The CyberKnight
  • The CyberKnight
  • 3,684 posts
  • LocationUnited States

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:05 AM

So...that's very hard to read. Are you saying that
1. The game lacks content and the patches don't solve balancing issues?
2. You are upset by all the ads (in the game) to try and get you to buy things?
3. You think the developers are almost ready to give up or have run out of money and that is why they are trying to get you to buy things?

If so, then
1. I suppose I agree overall.
2. Doesn't bother me. Ignore it. Any company wants you to buy things, especially in a F2P game.
3. I don't think that is true. They are currently working on community warfare and probably the clans. Both are big things. Besides, its a small dev team and it takes them awhile to get something done. Plus, they test things after they finish them, so it could be a 2-4 weeks before we see what they've finished.

#6 LordDante

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • IS Exemplar
  • IS Exemplar
  • 782 posts
  • Locationmy Wang is aiming at ur rear... torso

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:19 AM

Posted Image

i asked my mom ... op is not a relative of my family

putting that asside ( :rolleyes: )

MWO wont fail! but if it does , there will be MWO II and all the guys that are now here, will be there then !

#7 xNightAngelx

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 46 posts
  • LocationOhio

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:20 AM

View PostJDante, on 12 March 2013 - 02:47 AM, said:

Dear developers. I think, like many players, I have a choice of about 4-5 games of this type, like you, and the world of tanks that are actively developing.

I am a fan of the combat robots since childhood, of Microsoft games, books and other artributy, so I was very interested in promoting the MBO.

Unfortunately the comparison is not in our favor. The cost should also be noted that many of the players becomes annoying system "play for free" when in fact advertising and forcing invest points in the game throughout.

Of course for the thanks can not eat, and it is clear that any work should be rewarded.

But dear command will developers, unfortunately at the moment there are 3 things that spoil Projects simply incredible. About them and I would like to say.

1) MWO far behind the competition in terms of not function, developed and opportunities, as well a variety of patches make too little of interest in the basic rules of balance without new ideas.

2) VERY becomes annoying abundance of advertising against the omission of paragraph 1. Guys make the game better money itself will come, but we do not need to poke shares every day, looks petty.

3) The third point comes from the first two, the authority of the game drops, it seems that the developers have pulled out of the game, all monetary juices and Projects is about to close or zakrytiyu.K addition, many are worried that soon the game will be "pay to win."


Please pay attention to these problems and take decisive action, it is in your best interest.


please read and edit your post, it doesn't read very well. No offense but I just got off third shift, and I don't want to have to put together your thoughts for you.

#8 Jam the Bam

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 535 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:23 AM

How can you compare this to WoT? That game adds stuff regularily but its just MORE, nothing new, just more tanks and more maps, no new modes or styles or anything, just a ridiculous number of tanks to grind through because, and they have said this in interview, making people grind is profitable. That is NOT a good game to compare against.

The MWO devs have big things to develop like CW and the Clans themselves to come, these should be big game changers. Also the fact that a mech chassis is much more complex balance wise than a static tank to make due to the ability to modifiy it.

#9 Exoth3rmic

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 434 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:25 AM

Write it in your native language. It'll make as much sense to me. Seriously.

#10 Schrottfrosch

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 253 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:27 AM

obligatory reminder that game is in BETA...

#11 Taurick

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 216 posts
  • Location'straya

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:28 AM

View PostIlwrath, on 12 March 2013 - 03:00 AM, said:

Why the hell do they need to have all this commie crap in games developed in the former east block?

Communism lost. Its gone. It was ******** evil and now its gone! Nobody liked it and we still don't.
The west won the war, now get the **** out.

I'm guessing because **** you that's why

#12 Ilwrath

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:51 AM

View PostTaurich, on 12 March 2013 - 03:28 AM, said:

I'm guessing because **** you that's why


Can be. Good thing the Germans are not doing the same with their Nationalsozialismus. Another evil ideology that is now dead and buried. The Germans learned something from their failed social experiments, the east block dudes has obviously learned zero.

#13 JDante

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 209 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:52 AM

View PostxNightAngelx, on 12 March 2013 - 03:20 AM, said:


please read and edit your post, it doesn't read very well. No offense but I just got off third shift, and I don't want to have to put together your thoughts for you.


Sorry for this,English not my native,so I can't do this =( With all respect i use google translate for this topics.
I am worried about project progress,and the only way to hear my word,is to write on English lunguage in this topics.

I hope you understand the main idea of this topics

#14 Ilwrath

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:52 AM

View PostJammerben87, on 12 March 2013 - 03:23 AM, said:

How can you compare this to WoT? That game adds stuff regularily but its just MORE, nothing new, just more tanks and more maps, no new modes or styles or anything, just a ridiculous number of tanks to grind through because, and they have said this in interview, making people grind is profitable. That is NOT a good game to compare against.


Wow that is like this game minus more maps.

#15 JDante

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 209 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:56 AM

View PostSchrottfrosch, on 12 March 2013 - 03:27 AM, said:

obligatory reminder that game is in BETA...


no offence, but betta status does not mean,that we can't have opinion at all.

also we observe the efforts of developers and we can do conclusions about it.

#16 Moromillas

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 943 posts
  • LocationSecret **** moon base

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:57 AM

View PostSean von Steinike, on 12 March 2013 - 02:52 AM, said:

All your base, are belong to us.


All your bases, they now belong to us.

#17 jakucha

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 2,413 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:58 AM

MWO has been updating pretty quickly in terms of content and bug fixes with recent patches. If they keep that up I don't think there's too much to worry about.

#18 JDante

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 209 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:59 AM

View PostTheCaptainJZ, on 12 March 2013 - 03:05 AM, said:

So...that's very hard to read. Are you saying that
1. The game lacks content and the patches don't solve balancing issues?
2. You are upset by all the ads (in the game) to try and get you to buy things?
3. You think the developers are almost ready to give up or have run out of money and that is why they are trying to get you to buy things?

If so, then
1. I suppose I agree overall.
2. Doesn't bother me. Ignore it. Any company wants you to buy things, especially in a F2P game.
3. I don't think that is true. They are currently working on community warfare and probably the clans. Both are big things. Besides, its a small dev team and it takes them awhile to get something done. Plus, they test things after they finish them, so it could be a 2-4 weeks before we see what they've finished.


thanks for trying understand my word) , exactly it is!

#19 Ilwrath

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 04:09 AM

View Postjakucha, on 12 March 2013 - 03:58 AM, said:

MWO has been updating pretty quickly in terms of content and bug fixes with recent patches. If they keep that up I don't think there's too much to worry about.


The last patches has improved the game. No doubt about that. It badly need more game modes though. The game is very repetitive right now. How many times can you play on the same maps, doing the same thing before it gets old? The maps are so small (not Alpine) that you end up with the same thing over and over again.

They should add assault vs defend as they had in the old unreal games. That would have been perfect for this game. Or something like how Quake wars enemy territory was. Such a nice game that never got the playerbase it deserved. Levelling up equipment over a session was awesome. Cannot have that in a mech game but the whole mission structure was grand.

#20 JDante

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 209 posts

Posted 12 March 2013 - 04:10 AM

View PostJammerben87, on 12 March 2013 - 03:23 AM, said:

How can you compare this to WoT? That game adds stuff regularily but its just MORE, nothing new, just more tanks and more maps, no new modes or styles or anything, just a ridiculous number of tanks to grind through because, and they have said this in interview, making people grind is profitable. That is NOT a good game to compare against.

The MWO devs have big things to develop like CW and the Clans themselves to come, these should be big game changers. Also the fact that a mech chassis is much more complex balance wise than a static tank to make due to the ability to modifiy it.



its WOT base game,at all. But you are correct about world of tanks,project drowned in the greed of developers. Nothing new has been done, any ideas, functional. And if you dont know, almost all players don't like the warGAYming team,because too disrespectful to the players and hidden "fixed" tanks atribute (they call it "unsaid fixeds" little bustards are they? =) ) , and too many lies.

Not like is this is happens to all games based on arena types.

Edited by JDante, 12 March 2013 - 04:10 AM.






7 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users