Next Hero Mech
#41
Posted 18 March 2013 - 10:30 AM
#42
Posted 18 March 2013 - 10:37 AM
Heck the only way it would be anything else is if they switched the scheduled around. (Ok it could be a Cat but that is very unlikely due to the whole hero mech thing...)
#44
Posted 18 March 2013 - 11:36 AM
#45
Posted 18 March 2013 - 12:01 PM
#46
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:11 AM
Sephlock, on 17 March 2013 - 08:24 PM, said:
Anyway, I'm hoping for... lets see.... a Hero Atlas, with 4x the armor and four ballistic hardpoints (LA, LT, RT, RA).
i support an atlas with side torso energies
#47
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:13 AM
If an assault i say stalker, as the atlas is a founders mech and we already have a pretty baby hero.
If a light i say raven OR spider, as the jenner is a founders mech and we already have a Deaths Knell hero.
#48
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:23 AM
Light: 2 (Death's Knell, Jenner-D (F))
Medium: 3 (Yen-Lo-Wang, X-5, HBK-4G(F))
Heavy: 4 (Flame, Fang, Ilya Muromets, CPLT-C1(F))
Assault: 2 (Pretty Baby, Atlas-D(F))
So you could guess that it'd be a Light or Assault. Rumour has it that the Highlander is the next mech to arrive, so if you assume that they won't release two assaults in the same month then it'll be a Light mech. Which leaves the Spider or the Raven. I wouldn't like to see either of those as heroes, frankly - Spiders are crap and everyone is aware of the issues with Ravens.
#49
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:37 AM
They have a different C-Bill bonus. They do no have the unique hardpoint system of hero mechs ... and they are not for sale... That being said i think they will save those for last so to speak so only once the other mechs have heroes they will get theirs.
#50
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:38 AM
Besides, a hero light without ECM wouldn't have much success, while a heavy or assault probably would, and PGI might want to avoid pouring more oil into the fire until they got ECM rebalanced.
I hope for a Stalker, with 85% torsos twist if possible. I do not dare hope for a Stalker with a ballistic mount or two.
Edited by Shadowsword8, 19 March 2013 - 01:41 AM.
#51
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:16 AM
Davers, on 17 March 2013 - 09:01 PM, said:
why would founders complain?
i'd understand slight complaining if they implemented a jenner/hunchback/catapult/atlas hero mech with the chassis modification that is unique to the founder mechs (like the catapult's ******)
but a hero mech in general? what are founders? little spoiled brats that couldn't stand the thought of anyone else having a similar toy? you already have 4 mech chassis that no one else will ever have xD
and founder mechs are something totally different from hero mechs
founder mechs: unique model/unique paintjob/exact hardpoint layout like the "prime"-non founder variant/25% cbill boost/impossible to get after operation inception (the founder program)
hero: unique paintjob/unique hardpoint layout/30% cbill boost/mostly standard chassis-model
i'd personally would wish for a catapult hero
but i guess it will be a spider
#52
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:26 AM
Light
Medium
Heavy
Assault
We had Assault -> Pretty Baby. After that it started from the beginning.
We had the light -> DeathKnell.
We had the Mediums -> X5
So...what do you think we will get? Hmmm? Correct, applaus...a Heavy.
(and to whomever said we had like 3 Heros on Heavy...its basicaly correct, just dont forget that both Dragons count as one release (twins)).
So...catapult or Jagermech...what do you say?
#53
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:38 AM
#54
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:41 AM
Cole Allard, on 19 March 2013 - 02:26 AM, said:
Light
Medium
Heavy
Assault
We had Assault -> Pretty Baby. After that it started from the beginning.
We had the light -> DeathKnell.
We had the Mediums -> X5
So...what do you think we will get? Hmmm? Correct, applaus...a Heavy.
(and to whomever said we had like 3 Heros on Heavy...its basicaly correct, just dont forget that both Dragons count as one release (twins)).
So...catapult or Jagermech...what do you say?
EDIT #2: Actually bad news... there IS a spot for it to scroll down for another mech but you can actually do that right now and it's just a black space. So false alarm! Sorry guys!
Edited by El Penguin, 19 March 2013 - 03:06 AM.
#55
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:45 AM
El Penguin, on 19 March 2013 - 02:41 AM, said:
Theres a photo that shows 2 hero assault mechs so it could be a assault. I don't remember where to look for it though so I can't quote it.
Maybe the Jagermechs Hero version... The Jagermeister, standing on a hill, looking somewhat bigger then he is...he could be mistaken for an assault
#56
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:48 AM
Cole Allard, on 19 March 2013 - 02:45 AM, said:
Maybe the Jagermechs Hero version... The Jagermeister, standing on a hill, looking somewhat bigger then he is...he could be mistaken for an assault
Edited by El Penguin, 19 March 2013 - 02:55 AM.
#57
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:51 AM
Looking forward to it
#58
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:57 AM
Th0rsten, on 19 March 2013 - 02:51 AM, said:
Looking forward to it
I went for what everyone was saying in another thread without checking myself. I just checked to confirm if the image is actual proof and it's actually false since you can scroll down right now another mech but nothing will be there. So it may most likely not be a assault though it would be great if it was lol.
#59
Posted 19 March 2013 - 06:24 PM
Make it so it has 1 Balliistc point in the CT and the first ever Mech HTH weapon, a Bite that poisons the target's coolant system.
#60
Posted 22 March 2013 - 12:01 AM
2 Energy, 2 Ballistic in each arm.
Do it!
(Toss in free DHS please.)
30 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 30 guests, 0 anonymous users