Jump to content

3Rd Person "soon" According To Mwo Twitter


849 replies to this topic

#821 Lyrik

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 568 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:01 AM

View PostGarth Erlam, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:

To be clear, I will use large font and size because THE INTERNET:

THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.


Oh now... you crushed the whines in this thread... how could you xD

#822 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:01 AM

View PostLord Banshee, on 21 March 2013 - 07:58 AM, said:

Not good enough, Garth.

We want "3rd Person -- Never"

You just move 3rd Person to slightly more remote than Hospice length-of-stay in timeline.


Will THAT be enough? You still have the fact that HE said

View PostGarth Erlam, on 16 November 2012 - 02:59 PM, said:

MechWarrior Online is, and will always be, a game focused on 1st person combat in Mechs. That experience is sacrosanct to the classic Mechwarrior experience.

Cheers,
The MechWarrior Online Team


and that coolant wouldnt be in game etc

#823 DeathofSelf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 655 posts
  • LocationChicago

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:02 AM

If it's only in the test grounds, then fine. But in the actual game? No thank you

#824 Krellek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 221 posts
  • LocationGlendora, CA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:02 AM

View PostGarth Erlam, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:

To be clear, I will use large font and size because THE INTERNET:

THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.


Soon is a bad word to use there, 40 pages of thread while you were sleeping shows that.

:rolleyes:

We require a public flogging of 'Twitter Guy' to appease the masses.

Or Cake.

Atlas size Cake...

#825 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:04 AM

View PostKrellek, on 21 March 2013 - 08:02 AM, said:


Soon is a bad word to use there, 40 pages of thread while you were sleeping shows that.

:rolleyes:

We require a public flogging of 'Twitter Guy' to appease the masses.

Or Cake.

Atlas size Cake...


the cake is also a lie O.o

#826 Super Mono

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 484 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:05 AM

View PostGarth Erlam, on 21 March 2013 - 07:46 AM, said:

To be clear, I will use large font and size because THE INTERNET:

THIRD PERSON IN GAMEPLAY - NOT COMING SOON.


This is even less definitive than all the posts in the past saying we're not getting coolant flush. And yet here we are with coolant flush.

#827 Krellek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 221 posts
  • LocationGlendora, CA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:05 AM

View PostMechwarrior Buddah, on 21 March 2013 - 08:04 AM, said:


the cake is also a lie O.o


bump set spike

#828 KingCobra

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 2,726 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:06 AM

View PostRoadbeer, on 21 March 2013 - 07:56 AM, said:


In the latest poll, 1100 voted against 3rd person, 87 voted for. That's not even 10% of those polled want 3rd person.

Just sayin


For every 1 player that voted against 3rd person there was 10x founders that did not vote because they left the game over not having 3rd person tactics content etc. Are players not smart enough to make there own choices now? If they don't want to play 3rd person don't check the box and you will be queued with just first person players DUH if you check 3rd person in the box you will be queues with only 3rd person players DUH its that simple so they would be separated anyway. Posted Image

Edited by KingCobra, 21 March 2013 - 08:07 AM.


#829 Tarman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,080 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:07 AM

View PostChavette, on 21 March 2013 - 07:58 AM, said:

Its been said its probably the same guy, not 100% though.



Considering he was over in zvero's thread trolling him too, after zvero has been Defender Prime against us Disappointed Dudes, I have rapidly dwindling faith that any of his personalities are worthy of trust.

#830 Jungle Rhino

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 579 posts
  • LocationNew Zealand

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:08 AM

Anyone else remember when Paul said:

Quote

MechWarrior Online is being designed to put you the player in the seat of the pilot. It is 100% first person view only. Being the pilot is one of our key design pillars and 3rd person breaks that pillar on multiple levels as seen in many of the other 3rd Person discussions.


That was around about the time he said there wouldn't be any coolant flush either.

About the same time a bunch of idiots gave $5M dollars to some conmen on the interwebs.

#831 Rattlehead NZ

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • LocationAuckland New Zealand

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:09 AM

To all who remember "Knock Down"

That had a 3rd person view activate when you fell over. While i didn't mind that i always felt sorry for the guys who have built cockpits to feel like they were inside a mech only to have 3rd person view kick in. If it every came back i would love it if they kept it first person the whole time to give this game that "Sim" feeling again.

Oh and COD players won't scramble to play MWO if 3rd person was added, they are too busy already playing COD :rolleyes:

#832 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:09 AM

View PostJungle Rhino, on 21 March 2013 - 08:08 AM, said:

Anyone else remember when Paul said:


That was around about the time he said there wouldn't be any coolant flush either.

About the same time a bunch of idiots gave $5M dollars to some conmen on the interwebs.


or where he said:

Quote

MechWarrior Online is, and will always be, a game focused on 1st person combat in Mechs. That experience is sacrosanct to the classic Mechwarrior experience.


#833 Thirdstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,728 posts
  • LocationIndia

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:10 AM

View PostJungle Rhino, on 21 March 2013 - 08:08 AM, said:

About the same time a bunch of idiots gave $5M dollars to some conmen on the interwebs.


What game was this? Man those poor ********.

#834 Roadbeer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 8,160 posts
  • LocationWazan, Zion Cluster

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:10 AM

View PostKingCobra, on 21 March 2013 - 08:06 AM, said:


For every 1 player that voted against 3rd person there was 10x founders that did not vote because they left the game over not having 3rd person tactics content etc. Are players not smart enough to make there own choices now? If they don't want to play 3rd person don't check the box and you will be queued with just first person players DUH if you check 3rd person in the box you will be queues with only 3rd person players DUH its that simple so they would be separated anyway. Posted Image


You do understand that there is a tactical advantage of 3rd person over 1st person right? Arguments proving that have only played out over the last 44 pages (in this thread alone)

A simple checkbox doesn't address that imbalance, and having a seperate queue for those in 3rd person not being matched against those playing 1st person... well, the way Matchmaking is working now, do you REALLY want to pile another option into that hot mess?

#835 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:10 AM

View PostRattlehead NZ, on 21 March 2013 - 08:09 AM, said:

To all who remember "Knock Down"

That had a 3rd person view activate when you fell over. While i didn't mind that i always felt sorry for the guys who have built cockpits to feel like they were inside a mech only to have 3rd person view kick in. If it every came back i would love it if they kept it first person the whole time to give this game that "Sim" feeling again.

Oh and COD players won't scramble to play MWO if 3rd person was added, they are too busy already playing COD :rolleyes:


lol knockdown...
http://youtu.be/4K2QF70H2hc

#836 Alois Hammer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,296 posts
  • LocationHooterville

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:11 AM

View PostJungle Rhino, on 21 March 2013 - 08:08 AM, said:

Anyone else remember when Paul said:


That was around about the time he said there wouldn't be any coolant flush either.

About the same time a bunch of idiots gave $5M dollars to some conmen on the interwebs.

"Then I'll get on my knees and pray

We don't get fooled again..."



#837 Jonathan Paine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 1,197 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:16 AM

I think players understand full well the advantage of third person views for themselves. I have my doubts that they understand that everyone else will get that advantage as well. Personally, I enjoy the false sense of being in the cockpit of a giant robot. That is what I want, and that is what I will pay for.

#838 Damocles69

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 888 posts

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:17 AM

Thank you Garth. Thank you. You continue to be the only PGI employee that I moderately respect

#839 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:20 AM

Seriously though Garth, you should have said "never" not soon

#840 KingCobra

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 2,726 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 21 March 2013 - 08:20 AM

View PostRoadbeer, on 21 March 2013 - 08:10 AM, said:


You do understand that there is a tactical advantage of 3rd person over 1st person right? Arguments proving that have only played out over the last 44 pages (in this thread alone)

A simple checkbox doesn't address that imbalance, and having a seperate queue for those in 3rd person not being matched against those playing 1st person... well, the way Matchmaking is working now, do you REALLY want to pile another option into that hot mess?


I think maybe more segregation of this type would be good like 3rd or fpv or stock vs stock etc In the MM that way everyone could pick the boxes with the game types they wanted to play and everyone would be happy. Posted Image





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users