The Mauler May Be The Next Assault
#21
Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:03 PM
i would like Cyclops. Always thought it looked good, if I recall they were in MW2, but it might go all the way to my copy of MW from like super nintendo or something, i will have to look. In any case, I would like to have one in the new age of graphics!
#22
Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:20 PM
Its going to be either a
-Victor
-Mauler
-Cyclops
#23
Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:22 PM
#24
Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:25 PM
ShadowbaneX, on 27 March 2013 - 07:36 PM, said:
Fair enough...although, if that is the only source for it, that means the fear I had is currently true. The only way to get a 400 series engine, and worse, a mech that can mount it, is MC. Does that qualify as P2W?
In fairness, 400 engines are really terrible value and way way way beyond the reasonable point of diminishing returns on engine rating. 375/380 is really pushing it, 400s are just insane prices.
#25
Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:27 PM
Firelizard, on 27 March 2013 - 08:02 PM, said:
Because why should the Dragoon's have all the fun?
Because Mary Sue.
ShadowbaneX, on 27 March 2013 - 07:36 PM, said:
Is 4km/hr and an extra in-engine heatsink PTW in your opinion? If so yes. It really isn't though, the Pretty Baby ends up with 4.5 tons less to play with for those 4km/hr and .6 points of heat dissipation, and has noticeably inferior hardpoints to the -9M that carries a 385.
Edited by Gaan Cathal, 27 March 2013 - 08:32 PM.
#26
Posted 27 March 2013 - 08:48 PM
But, as a Steiner, I would be fine with the Zues
Edited by Zyllos, 27 March 2013 - 08:50 PM.
#27
Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:07 PM
I could fit 4uac5 in that. The dakka!! THE DAKKA!!
#28
Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:15 PM
#29
Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:25 PM
For that matter, given my limited experience with TT I've looked over numerous chassis on sarna.net and it seems that only "old" chassis have 4+ variants in many cases. This would limit a great deal of mechs created from 3050 onward, which seems like a bad move.
#30
Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:28 PM
#31
Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:38 PM
I am hoping a cyclops.
#33
Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:05 AM
Gaan Cathal, on 27 March 2013 - 08:27 PM, said:
I don't know, t hat's why I asked. I'm just a little uncertain about anything that offers additional benefit that can only be obtained for money/MC.
#34
Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:16 AM
Nikolii, on 27 March 2013 - 07:13 PM, said:
Wow, never considered this, but after looking at the wealth of decent variants available in this time period... the Charger really starts to make sense for MWO!
#35
Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:27 AM
But as for the Mauler, it is quite an iconic chassis, and I wouldn't be surprised if they find a way to get it in game despite the variant issues.
#36
Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:41 AM
Gaan Cathal, on 27 March 2013 - 08:01 PM, said:
Wrong! The clear Leader was the 100 ton Devastator and in the same poll, there was a "Bonus Voting" for the 95 ton Banshee and it got more than enough votes. But that means nothing. Back in the days, the clear winner of the 75 ton poll was the Black Knight, but look what we have, now. Oh ..it's the Orion...
#37
Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:43 AM
#39
Posted 28 March 2013 - 05:02 AM
#40
Posted 28 March 2013 - 05:05 AM
FupDup, on 27 March 2013 - 07:14 PM, said:
They could really even bump this up some. Give the thing 12 energy hard points. You could still fill it with small lasers and have a 36 relatively low heat alpha that can be keyed repeatedly in a short time span.
17 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 17 guests, 0 anonymous users