Jump to content

Reflective & Reactive Armor


17 replies to this topic

#1 Phoenix Branson

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,173 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:19 PM

It would be cool to see new armor types for MWO, such as:

Reflective armor
New type of armor designed to defeat lasers. It's not so good against ballistic or missile weapons. Reflective armor is best used in colder climates, when most Battlemechs will be using energy weapons, or when you are expecting a lot of energy weapons on your opponents.

Reactive armor
New type of armor designed to defeat ballistic weapons. It's not so good against beam or missile weapons. Reactive armor is best used in hotter climates, when most Battlemechs will be using ballistic weapons due to heat build-up.

Thoughts/Opinions?

Edited by Maverick01, 27 March 2013 - 07:24 PM.


#2 dario03

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander
  • 3,628 posts

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:24 PM

Well sure why not... But when it says not so good against beam/ballistic or missle does it mean no extra bonus or is it actually weaker than standard armor?

#3 GrimlockONE

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 599 posts
  • LocationIndianapolis

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:25 PM

View PostMaverick01, on 27 March 2013 - 07:19 PM, said:

It would be cool if the developers added new armor types for MWO, such as:

Reflective armor
New type of armor designed to defeat lasers. It's not so good against ballistic or missile weapons. Reflective armor is best used in colder climates, when most Battlemechs will be using energy weapons, or when you are expecting a lot of energy weapons on your opponents. It also weighs more for the same amount of protection, up to 50% more.

Reactive armor
New type of armor designed to defeat ballistic weapons. It's not so good against beam or missile weapons. Reactive armor is best used in hotter climates, when most Battlemechs will be using ballistic weapons due to heat build-up. It also weighs more for the same amount of protection, up to 50% more.

Thoughts/Opinions?



I would only implement these after we have gotten everything else in place, and I mean everything else. Clan tech, community warfare, DX11, and everything else still waiting to be implemented.

It would create a huge issue I believe as far as balancing goes. Once all weapon systems are where they should be then implement armor and ammunition types.

#4 FunkyFritter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 459 posts

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:25 PM

They're worthless in the game currently. There's no way to know what you'll be facing ahead of time, so all it would do is arbitrarily punish people once in a while.

#5 Team Leader

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,222 posts
  • LocationUrbanmech and Machine Gun Advocate

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:25 PM

Aren't these in the other MW titles? Yeah, I would like to see these in game

#6 DrSecretStache

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 483 posts
  • LocationWherever the Cbills flow

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:25 PM

http://www.sarna.net.../Reactive_Armor

As much as I would enjoy mixing things up, both those armor types apparently don't come into play until later in the timeline.

#7 Flying Fish

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 43 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:28 PM

isn't that what they had in MW4? or am i wrong about that lol... im definitely with you though i would think reactive armor would work against missiles just as well as ballistics.

#8 dario03

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander
  • 3,628 posts

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:28 PM

Yeah they were in MW4.

View PostZoughtbaj, on 27 March 2013 - 07:25 PM, said:

http://www.sarna.net.../Reactive_Armor

As much as I would enjoy mixing things up, both those armor types apparently don't come into play until later in the timeline.


Well I guess that's a decent reason not to. But they still could just call it something different or maybe one day we will have a time skip.

Edited by dario03, 27 March 2013 - 07:29 PM.


#9 DrSecretStache

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 483 posts
  • LocationWherever the Cbills flow

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:30 PM

http://www.sarna.net.../Hardened_Armor

After some further research, it looks like there may actually be timeline armor types available.

#10 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:34 PM

In about 13 years, both will be available.

Sad truth is tho, no matter how they tried to push em in fluff, since most mech forces carried a mix of weapon types, their very specialization is what makes them inferior to standard armor in most cases.

If they had ever implemented them intelligently, allowing them to act as normal armor, but with a bonus damage soak to their specialized nature, then we would finally have had an advanced armor worth the weight/critical concessions required.

#11 Tennex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 6,619 posts

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:37 PM

i don't really understand the design of these. like if you get reactive armor. do you just hope that the enemy uses a lot of ballistics? Isn't there like a 1/2 chance of it being lasers or ballistics

Edited by Tennex, 27 March 2013 - 07:45 PM.


#12 Squigles

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 426 posts

Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:43 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 27 March 2013 - 07:34 PM, said:

In about 13 years, both will be available.

Sad truth is tho, no matter how they tried to push em in fluff, since most mech forces carried a mix of weapon types, their very specialization is what makes them inferior to standard armor in most cases.

If they had ever implemented them intelligently, allowing them to act as normal armor, but with a bonus damage soak to their specialized nature, then we would finally have had an advanced armor worth the weight/critical concessions required.


Meh, reactive armor was pretty good, the actual chance of the negative effect being triggered on any given hit was 1 in 1296. So yes, it was entirely possible for the RNG to take a steaming dump on you, but in general practice it was vastly superior to standard armor especially if your pilots had edge to force a reroll on a TAC roll.

Same for reflective....keep the mech in the backfield so you don't need to worry about physical attacks, and the only real trade you're making is enhanced vulnerability against armor piercing ammo for half energy damage.

That being said, it's only a 13 year wait for reactive, reflective comes around in "only" 8 years. I'll be rocking that on the field in 2021!

Edited by Squigles, 27 March 2013 - 07:44 PM.


#13 Jazzbandit1313

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,088 posts
  • Location--- Star's End ---- -- Novo Cressidas --

Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:06 PM

The only way this feature will be useful is if a player will ever be able to pick what environment he wants to play in. you mention that on snow maps there will be laser heavy mechs. Not tru! how is a pilot supposed to know to load his boat with lasers if he has no idea what map he'll be on? that happens to me all the time and what do i get? caustic valley...but back to the point. the only way we'll ever see people dynamically changing their weapons that quickly (for every new round) and changing armor will be when we can choose what environment to play in.

#14 Merky Merc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Bludgeon
  • The Bludgeon
  • 871 posts
  • LocationRidin down the street in my 6-4

Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:57 PM

Reactive armor? Sounds like more of that crazy lostech stuff

Posted Image

#15 dario03

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander
  • 3,628 posts

Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:04 PM

View PostJazzbandit1313, on 27 March 2013 - 09:06 PM, said:

The only way this feature will be useful is if a player will ever be able to pick what environment he wants to play in. you mention that on snow maps there will be laser heavy mechs. Not tru! how is a pilot supposed to know to load his boat with lasers if he has no idea what map he'll be on? that happens to me all the time and what do i get? caustic valley...but back to the point. the only way we'll ever see people dynamically changing their weapons that quickly (for every new round) and changing armor will be when we can choose what environment to play in.


But if they made it so that you got a bonus against lasers but no negative vs missles and ballistics then it could work. Basically spend some tonnage and maybe some crit slots for extra protection vs certain weapons. Yeah its a bit of a gamble since you don't know what weapons you will come up against but since nobody knows that, you usually see a decent bit of every weapon in every game. Or maybe at some point we will know what map we are going to before hand.

#16 Vapor Trail

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,287 posts
  • LocationNorfolk VA

Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:21 PM

View PostZoughtbaj, on 27 March 2013 - 07:30 PM, said:

http://www.sarna.net.../Hardened_Armor

After some further research, it looks like there may actually be timeline armor types available.


So, just about double the amount of damage a light mech can take, by reducing the top speed by about 12 Kph and doubling the armor weight?

Nah. Don't think so. Lights can already be hard enough to kill.

#17 KingCobra

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 2,726 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:24 PM

View PostMaverick01, on 27 March 2013 - 07:19 PM, said:

It would be cool to see new armor types for MWO, such as:

Reflective armor
New type of armor designed to defeat lasers. It's not so good against ballistic or missile weapons. Reflective armor is best used in colder climates, when most Battlemechs will be using energy weapons, or when you are expecting a lot of energy weapons on your opponents.

Reactive armor
New type of armor designed to defeat ballistic weapons. It's not so good against beam or missile weapons. Reactive armor is best used in hotter climates, when most Battlemechs will be using ballistic weapons due to heat build-up.

Thoughts/Opinions?


Why the armor we have now does not work? and Ferro does little to change this fact. So adding more armor types would be just cosmetic. Plus we cant save builds in mechlab yet so rebuilding your mech for every few matches is already a pain in da aassss.

#18 Corwin Vickers

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 631 posts
  • LocationChateau, Clan Wolf Occupation Zone

Posted 27 March 2013 - 10:37 PM

View PostFunkyFritter, on 27 March 2013 - 07:25 PM, said:

They're worthless in the game currently. There's no way to know what you'll be facing ahead of time, so all it would do is arbitrarily punish people once in a while.



That's not really true. As certain builds become popular it is very easy to anticipate what you will fight on the field.

Splatcats and LRMs for example. Right now it would be Ballistics. After state rewind it was lasers.

It could be a possible buffer to Flavor of the month builds.

Edited by Corwin Vickers, 27 March 2013 - 10:38 PM.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users