Mechs Are Too Vulnerable?
#1
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:25 AM
- Host State Rewind leads to more accuracy and the mech is cored quite faster than before.
- OP-Builds are well known by the community (especially alpha-builds/boats)
- Disparity between experienced and new players has grown
In the end, from my point of view a pug doesn't last as long as it should do. I've played a lot of games where a clash lasts about 45 seconds. after this, either one team is completely down or there are some lights left who are being hunted easily by the whole winning team.
I think this is not what a "Mech-War" should be. Even an Atlas is being cored quite easily in a short period of time with some builds.
Don't get me wrong, it still should (and will) be necessary to stay in cover and to stick with your team!
Particularly with regard to newbies a single wrong move, when a OP-build with a good player is able to shoot 2 well aimed alphas, can result in 3 second death, even when he was at 100%.
So I vote for increased armor or durability at all for ALL mechs. Though this could have advantages for PGI as well:
- Money sink (because matches last longer)
- Alpha-/OP Builds become weaker and less dangerous
- This leads to a better balance
- Alternative builds become more interesting and competetive.
- New players have more chances to realize what they did wrong instead of dying almost instantly without having a clue what was going on)
This is not a whining thread, it's only about having no fun to stomp or being stomped (not that often ) in less than 60 seconds and about missing the feeling that we are sitting in heavy war machines and not in a plastic-robot.
#2
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:29 AM
#3
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:30 AM
#4
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:36 AM
#5
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:36 AM
#6
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:36 AM
#7
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:40 AM
normally it would take equal amount of effort to get through armor and internal. but right now losing your armor is a death sentence
Critical hits would have been applicable half the time. And tearing through armor doesn'tmean the mech dies in 2 more shots.
Edited by Tennex, 04 April 2013 - 04:52 AM.
#8
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:41 AM
#9
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:42 AM
I want ballistics to stay thank you.
Sustained damage becomes less valuable, simply because it will take even longer than it does now to take an enemy down. So this will actually increase, not decrease, the need for high alpha coordination. You may live a few seconds longer but you will still not have a chance, unless you get better. Dying from simple mistakes is the best way to learn not to make said mistakes.
PS: I also want SRM's and LRM's fixed so missles are valuable again
Game will be WAY too boring if there is only energy weapons around, even though I prefer them myself.
edited for borked initial layout
Edited by LT Kinslayer, 04 April 2013 - 04:45 AM.
#10
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:47 AM
Everybody figures out sooner or later that there's no point in taking a PPC, LL and a pair of MLas, when you can just boat 3xPPCs. It's simpler to fire and brings concentrated firepower thus becoming more effective than a balanced build.
Heat is no problem if you know a thing or two about weapon grouping.
#11
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:52 AM
Based on different weapon stats from different former Mechwarrior games
I assert that every shot with a large laser will hit directly the targeted area with 100%
It last only ca. 10sec to bring down a Atlas in MW2 (10 shots)
35 sec in MW3 (10hits)
55 sec in MWO
60 sec in MW4
65 sec with Solaris IV Rules
100 sec in TT and MechCommander (when shots will hit)
150 sec in MWLL
You must consider that not every shot of the tactical games will hit. You have to consider that the MW3 heatspike make it nearly impossible to fire a large laser with its high rof - without overheating.
I think 150 sec is a good value...to calculate with...means...reduce damage or rof or increase heat for weapons in MWO
Edit: mistake....its 55sec in MWO
Edited by Karl Streiger, 04 April 2013 - 05:05 AM.
#12
Posted 04 April 2013 - 04:58 AM
Drenzul, on 04 April 2013 - 04:36 AM, said:
You are right, but improved durability of a mech forces the alpha build to hit more often... so in the end heat becomes a problem. Actually 2 6x PPC alphas can core you. Thats exactly what you are able to fire with a Stalker without having heat problems. So if this Stalker have to shoot twice as much alphas (4x) to get the same result, the time needed for this will increase like 3x/4x due to heat dissipation.
Edited by orion33, 04 April 2013 - 05:01 AM.
#13
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:04 AM
orion33, on 04 April 2013 - 04:58 AM, said:
You are right, but improved durability of a mech forces the alpha build to hit more often... so in the end heat becomes a problem. Actually 2 6x PPC alphas can core you. Thats exactly what you are able to fire with a Stalker without having heat problems. So if this Stalker have to shoot twice as much alphas (4x) to get the same result, the time needed for this will increase like 3x/4x due to heat dissipation.
It's a good thing that the devs have already decided that Laser and Ballistic damage is pretty much where it needs to be in comparison to Armor on mechs.
Drenzul, on 04 April 2013 - 04:36 AM, said:
Concentrated Fire from multiple players will ALWAYS trump the single player that is being targeted. It doesn't matter if they are using PPCs, Medium Lasers, AC2's, or Flamers.
Edited by Syllogy, 04 April 2013 - 05:05 AM.
#14
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:07 AM
#15
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:08 AM
orion33, on 04 April 2013 - 04:58 AM, said:
You are right, but improved durability of a mech forces the alpha build to hit more often... so in the end heat becomes a problem. Actually 2 6x PPC alphas can core you. Thats exactly what you are able to fire with a Stalker without having heat problems. So if this Stalker have to shoot twice as much alphas (4x) to get the same result, the time needed for this will increase like 3x/4x due to heat dissipation.
The Problem with your idea is that higher durability favours high alpha builds even more. Alpha builds minimize the time out of cover, while doing maximum damage in minimum time. This is so good, because sustained DPS builds lack the dps to destroy a target fast enough - you can not expect to engage an enemy without taking a lot of damage yourself, because it is not possible to burst it down. Unless you outnumber or outgun the enemy massively. With an high alpha build on the other hand, especially with poptarding, you can easily kill one or more enemies if you are good. Without taking much damage in return.
#16
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:12 AM
Syllogy, on 04 April 2013 - 05:04 AM, said:
Concentrated Fire from multiple players will ALWAYS trump the single player that is being targeted. It doesn't matter if they are using PPCs, Medium Lasers, AC2's, or Flamers.
True that. If I had a dollar given to me every time an Atlas with an invulnerability complex strode into the enemy and evaporated before whining about lack of support, I MAY be able to afford the Heavy Metal.
Edit; stupid phone.
Edited by Kiiyor, 04 April 2013 - 05:13 AM.
#17
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:14 AM
If all those alpha strikes hit in slightly different locations and chain firing enabled pin-point accuracy, you would see mechs living longer. Alpha strikes spreading damage, so it takes longer for a section to open up and chain firing taking time to line up and fire all the weapons to a single location would bring more tactical gameplay since there is a choice between how to fire your weapons.
This also opens up the ability that while alpha strikes might spread damage, they facilitate the ability to torso twist away from your target while chain firing allows control of damage but you have to keep facing your target.
Right now, you alpha strike all weapons that are in range and can hit, or you don't fire. That, in my eyes, is a huge problem with MWO. If your not hitting the same location again and again, your considered wasting time/ammo.
Why should it ever be considered wrong to shoot at a mech?
Edited by Zyllos, 04 April 2013 - 05:17 AM.
#18
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:17 AM
Apostal, on 04 April 2013 - 04:30 AM, said:
No, first of all they haven't forced anything. Second, they doubled the armor values to enhance survivabiltiy so it's actually FUN. So there's actually engaging combat and some back and forth, not just one-sided sneak attacks and sniper kills.
Quote
I still have yet to find a single build where I would want a PPC over Lasers. Granted, I don't snipe much, and since they just nerfed the hell out of Thermal, there won't be much effective sniping anymore. So you already have your wish there.
Quote
You must be having flashbacks to MW4, because that's certainly not the case in 99% of MWO matches.
Heat is fine. Accuracy is fine. Loadouts and builds are fine.
Honestly, some of you just go around constantly looking for something to complain about being OP or needing a nerf. Another fine example of a thread PGI will hopefully just ignore, like the "add more restrictions in the mechlab" nonsense going on in another thread.
Edited by jay35, 04 April 2013 - 05:18 AM.
#19
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:20 AM
Now a single AC 20 isn't so tremendously feared as it should, so what do you do? Oh yes, you bring two of them!
Boating or big alpha builds are effective, first because you don't need to deal with many different weapon systems, second because having a good alpha allows to get out of cover -> place the shot -> return to cover to cooldown -> change cover exit rinse & repeat.
In such an environment, it's pretty normal that high DPS builds will never do good as they should, because who develops high DPSs need to stay in the open, needs a clear target to keep firing on, but this target fades away after placing 4 ppcs twice in your side torso to kill you.
So what about headshots? Adding more armor will lead to use esclusively high alpha builds, even more than what happens now.
Boating can be addressed by further balancing certain weapons. Besides the negiglibe heat, whenever I have 7 tons free I don't really find any reason to use a LPLAS instead of a PPC or even an ER PPC.
The same goes for MPLS compared to Mlasers. In both cases the higher dps isn't worth the extra weight, heat and the huge range restrictions. Make that MPLS weight 1.5 tons each and LPLSs 6 tons or even 5,5 and you'd see more brawlers around relying on them.
LRMS.. a quick nerf is to limit the launcher size to the available tubes. You have a mech with the RT that has 15 tubes and you have 2 missile hardpoints in there? Good, you can either place a single LRM15 and a SRM launcher as a backup or you can go with a LRM10+LRM5. Stop.
Stalkers wouldn't be able to go dual LRM20 + dual LRM15 (side torsoes would allow only a single LRM5 each) and only true missile boats would arise (STK 4N, Catapult C4, Awesomes, TBTs, HBK 4J, eventually Atlases), not as it is now.
The same could be done also for SRMS. Splatpult A1s would not be existing, since you could only mount either 2xSRM6+1xSRM2 or 2xSRM4+1xSRM6 at maximum since each arm would allow only 15 total tubes. But you could combine LRMs with SRMs to limit the moaning factor (something like this CPLT-A1 could be allowed).
Centurions wouldn't be able to hold more than SRM6+SRM4 having 10 tubes only and so on, but they could combine LRM10+SRM4+SRM6 on the CN9-A ).
#20
Posted 04 April 2013 - 05:25 AM
He's a great shot that took out half the enemy team. READ: Carried the team.
He's a great shot but against a team of players that know how to spread their damage.
He's got good accuracy but completely imprecise. He himself is spreading his damage out on an enemy mech(s) (IE death spiral) firing and hitting enemy mechs all over the mech instead of trying to hit the same spot every time. IE shot discipline.
The team you want to fear is the team that no member breaks 400 damage but cored the entire enemy team. Because that means they are all great shots AND hitting the same spots every time.
Edited by Loxx, 04 April 2013 - 05:35 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users