Beazle, on 04 June 2012 - 04:31 AM, said:
That's because your coming for a video game background. I'm coming from a table top background. People who got introduced via the novels or (don't laugh) the tv series will probably have an even different perspective. This is one of the reasons why Battletech has always been a fairly tricky intellectual property.
So many people have so many different perspectives on the game universe, and what should be done with it that your bound to **** a bunch of them off no matter what you do.
Aye, very true. I went from PC games to novels, and my perspective was more or less solid before I discovered the TV series. And while I've never had my hands on the TT or even a sourcebook, I respect the heck out of it, and am excited that PGI wants to put in rules and such from the TT into a MechWarrior game. I admit that I'd prefer to be in the cockpit than looking at a board, but I love the idea of so much strategy being the norm for a game.
But we were talking about era. I admit that I don't know much about pre-Invasion BattleTech beyond what I've read in Stackpole's Warrior Trilogy. Finding books in print has been an exercise in futility in my hometown, and I got a Kindle specifically to get BT books, but now that's gone into limbo. When (if) that bit gets resolved, I'll definitely grab GDL stuff, but until then, I am sadly uninformed from stuff prior to the Fourth Succession War, minus what little I could glean from Sarna.net.