Really...i Want A Catapult With Four Ballistic Hard Points...
#1
Posted 08 April 2013 - 06:49 PM
I would pay for this. Like money. Real money.
#2
Posted 08 April 2013 - 10:26 PM
#3
Posted 08 April 2013 - 11:14 PM
#4
Posted 09 April 2013 - 12:06 AM
Edited by armyunit, 09 April 2013 - 12:06 AM.
#5
Posted 09 April 2013 - 12:50 AM
#6
Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:50 AM
The Cataphract doesn't give me the slots to run the configuration I have in mind.
#7
Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:42 AM
I think you should just get on with Jagermech. No offense
There is a reason why all mechs has all those pros and cons.
#8
Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:48 AM
#9
Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:50 AM
2 missile and 2 ballistic...and maybe they give you 2 ballistic slots for each AC 2.
#10
Posted 09 April 2013 - 07:51 AM
even the K2 should never have had full ballistic hardpoints; it's 2 are meant just for MGs. It's a mistake for MWO to consider MGs and ACs in the same weapon type.
#11
Posted 09 April 2013 - 08:14 AM
Makenzie71, on 08 April 2013 - 06:49 PM, said:
Unless they introduce a variant that isn't canon, you will never get what you ask. Every variant of every 'Mech we have in the game (except some of the Heroes) is canon.
#12
Posted 09 April 2013 - 08:28 AM
Durant Carlyle, on 09 April 2013 - 08:14 AM, said:
Other than the X5, they're all canon. And the X5 was only because there ISN'T a 'famous' Cicada variant we could use.
#13
Posted 09 April 2013 - 08:45 AM
HammerSwarm, on 09 April 2013 - 05:48 AM, said:
No AC20. I don't think the arms will support them even if you wanted them. Possibly you could run a pair of Gauss, but even that's not very bright. Getting right down to the point, I want to run four AC2's with the option of switching out a pair of high mount Ultras from time to time, while keeping a pair of ER PPC's center mass.
I don't believe switching a ballistic and energy configuration around would make a super damage variant while the rest of the Cat is still just as limited.
Garth Erlam, on 09 April 2013 - 08:28 AM, said:
So what's the "famous" Catapult varient?
Make it a Hero mech. I wouldn't care. Like I said, I would gladly PAY money for a 4X ballistic Cat.
#14
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:13 AM
Um... no. There are all ready tons of ballistics out there. there are all ready high mount AC2's in the same weight class.
Sorry. If there was a poll, the vote would be 'no'.
Makenzie71, on 09 April 2013 - 02:50 AM, said:
Actually, the beefit would be getting the ballistics up high where you want them. The reason the Jager can't mount ER PPC's in the torso? OP.
#15
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:18 AM
#16
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:29 AM
#17
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:42 AM
blinkin, on 09 April 2013 - 10:29 AM, said:
Oh i expect more the 4 UAC5 K2...because....4 Gauss...even with clan tech or light ones are 48 to 60tons.
Although I'm still curious...Fang, Flame and Ilya Muromets are canon????
#18
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:47 AM
#19
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:12 AM
Garth Erlam, on 09 April 2013 - 10:47 AM, said:
Didn't you make up the Ilya and it's pilot too?
That is not a complaint, I love the mech, but AFAIK there is no Ilya Muromets, nor a famous pilot in one, according to canon.
#20
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:20 AM
Tickdoff Tank, on 09 April 2013 - 11:12 AM, said:
That is not a complaint, I love the mech, but AFAIK there is no Ilya Muromets, nor a famous pilot in one, according to canon.
be careful about making claims like that. the literature on battletech is fairly extensive to say the least. stackpole alone wrote 14 books. i would imagine there is a fair bit more beyond that.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users