Has Mwo Gone On A "crappy Mech" Spree
#1
Posted 06 March 2013 - 08:41 AM
For example, the Trebuchet is a good mech, standing on its own, but is yet a third addition in the 50 ton category. This has left the 55 ton sweet spot for mechs completely open yet again. I understand the whole legal issue with "Unseen" mechs, but there are still a number of chassis which are owned by Catalyst that could be used as a frame to fill that slot. We desperately need a 55 ton jump capable mech to be that balance point between scout and fighter.
I would also question why we need a Cataphract when we don't have an entry in the 75 ton slot. That's the perfect tipping point between Fast Heavy and Assault, and yet it's not covered.
The same is true with the over-tweeking of the Cicada. I actually have used that mech a few times in TT play, and have the ECM version in MWO, but the Phoenix Hawk (or whatever 45 tonner they use to substitute) is a much better mech, and a lot more fun to play.
Now with the Jagermech coming up, it just seems like there another useless class to add on, and so many optimal spot still open to put really interesting (and sellable - HINT) mechs.
#2
Posted 06 March 2013 - 08:45 AM
Also... The locust, griffin, shadow hawk, thunderbolt, wolverine and Battlemaster have all now been moved from the unseen list to reseen. These mech may now be legal to use again. At least in their updated reseen looks.
Edited by Yoseful Mallad, 06 March 2013 - 08:50 AM.
#3
Posted 06 March 2013 - 08:53 AM
Mercworks, on 06 March 2013 - 08:41 AM, said:
Dare to question my Cataphracts.I love them.
The chassis is always one of the top spots of every "favourite-mech" - poll.
Orion is coming to fill the 75 tons.
Mercworks, on 06 March 2013 - 08:41 AM, said:
I look forward to Dual AC/20 + XL Engine.
Could live without it tho - Highlander is THE mech i am waiting for - especially HGN-733C
#4
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:02 AM
Our current mech chassis include.
No 20 ton mechs (Flea has been announced)
25 ton Commando w/hero mech version
30 ton spider
35 ton Jenner
35 ton Raven
40 ton Cicada w/hero mech version
No 45 ton mechs (Blackjack has been announced)
50 ton Hunchback
50 ton Centurion (with hero mech version)
50 ton Trebuchet
No 55 ton mech chassis announced at this time.
60 ton Dragon with two hero mech chassis
65 ton Catapult
65 ton Jaeger mech comming later this month
70 ton Cataphract
No 75 ton (Orion announced)
80 ton Awesome with hero mech version
85 ton Stalker
No 90 ton (Highlander announced)
No 95 ton mech announced
100 ton Atlas
So with the currently announced line up we are still lacking in 55 ton chassis and 95 ton chassis.That leaves very few in period choices to fill those gaps so my predictions for those weight classes are.
55 tons Dervish: only problem I see is that within the timeline there are only two Varients I am aware of.That will require at least a third varient to be created to fill the needed 3.
95 ton Banshee: Only 95 ton mech I am aware of that has suffecent varients in production in the 3050 time line.
Edited by Lykaon, 06 March 2013 - 09:04 AM.
#5
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:05 AM
Yoseful Mallad, on 06 March 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:
Also... The locust, griffin, shadow hawk, thunderbolt, wolverine and Battlemaster have all now been moved from the unseen list to reseen. These mech may now be legal to use again. At least in their updated reseen looks.
Please tell me where I can find a link for this information as I want the Locust badly!
-k
#6
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:05 AM
#7
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:08 AM
#8
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:09 AM
#9
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:12 AM
Shadow Hawk and Griffin are so, so mechs that can be saved by tweaking a few things, but the rest is complete and utter garbage.
Seriously, unless tehy add unseens, I think we won't loose anything if the first 55 tonner is something from later on.
#10
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:19 AM
In regards to the OP's concerns, I feel the selection is ok and theya re working on it as they can with the available chassis. Correct me if I am wrong isnt the Jagermech taking the place of the unseen Rifleman?
Regards
Edited by Andross Deverow, 06 March 2013 - 09:21 AM.
#11
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:28 AM
#12
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:30 AM
But the Highlander is gonna be feared. If you thought the 3D was a good poptart...
#13
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:37 AM
as for unseens can PGI use reseen designs since theyre hooked up with catalyst?
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 06 March 2013 - 09:38 AM.
#14
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:39 AM
Yoseful Mallad, on 06 March 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:
Also... The locust, griffin, shadow hawk, thunderbolt, wolverine and Battlemaster have all now been moved from the unseen list to reseen. These mech may now be legal to use again. At least in their updated reseen looks.
No disrespect intended, Yoseful, but I think this is wishful thinking. I would love to be wrong, however. I just don't think we'll be seeing any of the Unseen.
#15
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:39 AM
The Dervish has only two variants that could be used in 3050 (the 6md and 7D), which leaves us with the not-very-attractive Kintaro.
#16
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:41 AM
Mercworks, on 06 March 2013 - 08:41 AM, said:
The Cataphract exists for one reason only. The Maruader is unseen. That mech was made in BT to fill that void. And here in MWO the 'phract also fills that void.
#17
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:42 AM
#18
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:43 AM
Royalewithcheese, on 06 March 2013 - 09:30 AM, said:
I doubt this. With 3 total jump jets it'll probably barely lift off the ground. Jump jets still are kind of slow for the take off and the max height distance usually can barely lift up onto a building. It would be the same problem with the UrbanMech which mounts just 2.
Edited by General Taskeen, 06 March 2013 - 09:43 AM.
#19
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:43 AM
And 55 tons is a miracle on two metal legs...
#20
Posted 06 March 2013 - 09:43 AM
-k
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users