Marauder
#21
Posted 28 April 2013 - 09:41 AM
#22
Posted 28 April 2013 - 12:16 PM
Joseph Marik, on 27 April 2013 - 04:44 PM, said:
Here is a link to said design, which I actually like.
Zharot, on 27 April 2013 - 04:46 PM, said:
What's more, the fin-things at the back give it away as the Project Phoenix version of the Clan-built, 85-ton Marauder IIC...
#23
Posted 28 April 2013 - 03:12 PM
#24
Posted 28 April 2013 - 04:05 PM
Orion is cool, but it appears that the MW:O version suffers from obesity. For its size, the legs are too fat and the hips are too wide. And, it's no Marauder.
There can be only one ... and it's not the Highlander.
#25
Posted 28 April 2013 - 04:10 PM
tarlison2k11, on 27 April 2013 - 08:53 PM, said:
except the ER Large Lasers (that do more damage than ours, at longer range than ER PPCs) and LRMs with no minimum range will core out your splat cat before you get close and the MadCat will still be running faster. Or they will demonstrate what CLAN ER PPCs and 4 Streak SIX pcks can do to an Inner Sphere Mech.
#26
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:27 AM
Durant Carlyle, on 28 April 2013 - 04:05 PM, said:
All of the MWO designs are like that. The TT designs almost always turn out lanky and weirdly skinny-looking when you try to turn them into 3D shapes, either miniatures or game models.
That is five tons less than an Awesome, and five tons more than a Cataphract. It's the same reason the Centurion is wider and stockier, the Awesome is fat and wide, and the Cataphract is a solid wall.
#27
Posted 09 June 2013 - 10:47 AM
MasterErrant, on 28 April 2013 - 03:12 PM, said:
It can not be a "direct replacement" a direct replacement would weigh the same, the phract is 5 tons lighter, and would have the same hard point setup, it does not. It may be similar, but not the same.
Edited by Geminus, 09 June 2013 - 11:32 AM.
#28
Posted 09 June 2013 - 04:01 PM
Carl Wrede, on 26 April 2013 - 05:11 PM, said:
Actually, despite being an ancient TT/Mechwarrior fan, I don't really care for the old illustrations of the older mechs. I mainly just care about the names of the mechs and the hardpoints. If they only vaguely resemble the old mechs, that's fine with me. There's more in the name and spirit than the crappy 80's and early 90s illustrations of these mechs.
#30
Posted 11 June 2013 - 08:42 AM
Strum Wealh, on 28 April 2013 - 12:16 PM, said:
This is the design they used on the Mechwarrior Age of Destruction collectibles.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users