Consolation Prizes?
#21
Posted 29 April 2013 - 10:40 AM
The reason I defend the contest is because the way it is attacked is flawed. And by flawed, I mean stupid beyond any recognition.
#22
Posted 29 April 2013 - 10:43 AM
#23
Posted 29 April 2013 - 10:49 AM
#24
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:07 AM
Someone recorded a video of him winning a 4v1 in his Jenner (his 3rd best mech) here it is: http://www.youtube.c...ZQwkB94#t=7m50s
He is in the Comstar NA Teamspeak sitting right there in one of the first couple public channels, and I'm sure he wouldn't mind you jumping in to his TS channel, muting your mic, and listening to what goes on in there.
He is just better than everyone playing these challenges; that's the difference and it's hard to stomach for some people.
Koreanese, no need to get defensive. It is just a few sore losers that think you are doing anything wrong. You have been in public channels 100% of the time, and there is stream and video evidence of you playing legit every single time, and not even a scrap of evidence against you, other than the fact that you are dominating the leaderboards (which isn't really evidence against you). Don't let that get to you, you have no need to defend yourself in that way. Stay in that public channel, I'll keep streaming our TS at night and when we get dropped into the same game, others will keep streaming and recording, and when all they see is great games, the doubters will be silenced.
Edited by PEEFsmash, 29 April 2013 - 11:08 AM.
#25
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:14 AM
its funny,
koreanese,
is a sick player get over it
#26
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:35 AM
Koreanese, on 29 April 2013 - 10:49 AM, said:
Where did I accuse you of sych dropping? Can you read English? If not, stop posting. I said when I drop I see you most times, indicating that if you and I were actually trying to synch drop as an example it obviously works.
Your constant defensive posture of this is making me wonder about you at this point. Non guilty people do not exhibit so much denial. The fact the two other people constantly mimic your defense makes me wonder how often they end up in matches with you "randomly" at this point also.
#27
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:37 AM
Edited by Koreanese, 29 April 2013 - 11:38 AM.
#28
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:43 AM
#29
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:44 AM
Edited by Koreanese, 29 April 2013 - 11:45 AM.
#30
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:48 AM
GG on spending so much time getting those 5 lucky 1200 point wins. Your skill in MWO is matchless and you can say or do no wrong in life.
#31
Posted 29 April 2013 - 11:55 AM
#32
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:07 PM
Something like ([score of your best game of each day) *x ]
x= 500 (or 1000) CBills.
Would net around 80-100k or 150-200k respectively. Nothing spectacular but a nice gesture.
#33
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:30 PM
#34
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:31 PM
i normally score under the first 50.. often top 15, but for number one i'm not good enough... so it would be nice to get some little reward for trying
Edited by Iphariel, 29 April 2013 - 12:44 PM.
#35
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:34 PM
#36
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:48 PM
You really need to get rid of that Crescent Hawks banner.
#37
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:55 PM
To put it perspective, I don't think you need to do as well as you think to place near the top. Saturday was my only attempt and I made it to 3rd for the Lights with a score of 1,023. I didn't keep track but I think my best matches were as follows;
5 kills, 3 assists
4k, 3a
4k, 3a
4k, 2a
3k, 5a
For Mechs I used a RVN-2X with 4ML and 1 SRM6+Artemis, a JR7-F with 5ML, and a JR7-K with 4ML and 1 SRM2.
#38
Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:57 PM
Sure some of us, myself included, are using this tournament as an internal way to benchmark personal skills, rather than outward epeen waving. But lets be honest, you're either gunning for number one or you're out to have fun and let the chips fall where they may. I know I could've saved myself a ****** up sleep schedule for rest of week if I had thrown in the towel 8, 10 hours earlier than I did.
I'll take a consolation prize but I don't think they should add them, particularly after-the-fact of the tourny already going on... and it certainly doesn't change the reality that 1st is 1st...there can be only one.
#39
Posted 29 April 2013 - 01:00 PM
#40
Posted 29 April 2013 - 01:03 PM
The word irregardless doesn't really mean what you think it means. It is a mistake to use this word as it contains a double negative (the prefix ir- and the suffix -less) while the root--regard--implies "having to do with..." In the context you are looking for, the word to use is "regardless", meaning without regard to the present situation. Adding in the suffix ir- only serves to negate the meaning you most likely wanted to use.
While irregardless may be formally constructed, its use is quite informal. It may even just be a portmanteau of "irrespective" and "regardless" smooshed together.
TL;DR: When you want to use the mostly fallacious word "irregardless" use the word "regardless" instead.
*edited to fix grammatical errors, OCD fail!
Edited by Pyrrho, 29 April 2013 - 01:15 PM.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users