valkyrie, on 22 May 2013 - 09:13 PM, said:
I maintain that my analysis was pretty reasonable given the circumstances. There's very little there that would suggest either of us was correct at first glance. You cleared the air, gave an explanation, I admitted I was wrong...and you still insulted me (which is against the rules of this forum I might add), insist I should be shamed and say that I intentionally lied.
Alrighty then, whatever floats your boat. I'll leave the verdict to the jury and not the prosecutor at this point.
You've already admitted you went on the air and made assumptions, stating misinformation about something you didn't know anything about and didn't give a second glance. Burden of proof is on you, not me. Again, if you were so concerned and curious about this major incident and wanted to talk about it publicly, you'd think you would have talked to someone, anyone to get some actual facts and information. But I know, that wouldn't have been nearly as entertaining as making **** up.
Sir, we don't have to agree, and I'm sure won't - but if you say things about my crew, my friends, and/or my colleagues that are untrue, I will come to their and our defense, period. That's my right! Beyond that, it's your sandbox, your playground...rock on!
Edited by Bombadil, 22 May 2013 - 09:28 PM.