Teammate Electronic Warfare Consumable Will Earn Pgi Millions
#1
Posted 22 May 2013 - 03:22 PM
#2
Posted 22 May 2013 - 11:37 PM
#3
Posted 23 May 2013 - 10:49 PM
#4
Posted 24 May 2013 - 08:21 AM
Also, I'd like to see your financial forecast and market predictions that have lead you to believe this is a multi-million dollar idea. Numbers, man! I need numbers!
#5
Posted 24 May 2013 - 10:11 PM
#6
Posted 25 May 2013 - 12:30 AM
#7
Posted 25 May 2013 - 05:17 AM
think of it like this, you drive your friend every day and ne never wears his seatbelt. you scream at him to put it on but he ignores you for whatever reason. the best way to get his attention is to drive a bit and slam on the breaks so he hits his head. do that a few times and you will see a quick change in behavour, he will either get mad and exit the car, or put his seat belt on lol.
a little negetaive effect for being lazy is not a bad thing for games. compare it to buffs in wow, you use them because well, they buff. so essentially a little "debuff" on mechs that refuse to use R to target would soon correct their behaviour
Edited by buttmonkey, 25 May 2013 - 05:19 AM.
#8
Posted 25 May 2013 - 08:22 AM
Let's see what the lads down at the Barracks wanna say about this.
#9
Posted 28 May 2013 - 02:30 PM
Even worse is when they've already targeted someone...
and they start firing on a DIFFERENT mech in the same location that's damaged on the OTHER MECH THEY'RE TARGETING.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!
There are days where I want to be able to just reach through the screen and slap the person on the other side. Have they ever even read the guides?
#10
Posted 30 May 2013 - 11:45 AM
Edited by Aslena, 30 May 2013 - 11:46 AM.
#11
Posted 30 May 2013 - 06:32 PM
Spirit of the Wolf, on 28 May 2013 - 02:30 PM, said:
and they start firing on a DIFFERENT mech in the same location that's damaged on the OTHER MECH THEY'RE TARGETING.
To be fair, some of us can fire lrms at a distant, but locked target, while also using direct fire weapons on an un-targeted, but closer opponent. Especially when opponent 2 is too close for lrm use.
But yeah, unless someone intentionally dual targeting, what you describe sounds kinda wonky.
#12
Posted 30 May 2013 - 07:18 PM
They seem to forget that you need to change the lock to find out where you should aim.
#13
Posted 31 May 2013 - 11:52 PM
#14
Posted 01 June 2013 - 06:56 PM
Fail
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users