Incoming Hot Fix - 24/05/2013 (Updated!)
#21
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:43 PM
Well, I guess I can take the AMS back off my mechs tomorrow.
#22
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:46 PM
Paul Inouye, on 23 May 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:
The flight path change makes it so that when you have indirect firing capabilities, the missiles don't come down at 80'ish degrees. They now come down between 60-70 degrees allowing you to take cover much easier. Stay out in the open and you're still going to feel the pain.
Thanks for the details and the quick turnaround on this Paul!
#23
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:47 PM
Edited by White Bear 84, 23 May 2013 - 08:51 PM.
#24
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:47 PM
Paul Inouye, on 23 May 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:
The flight path change makes it so that when you have indirect firing capabilities, the missiles don't come down at 80'ish degrees. They now come down between 60-70 degrees allowing you to take cover much easier. Stay out in the open and you're still going to feel the pain.
Thank you for the prompt clarification, Paul, and I am glad that you are changing what is causing the problem and not what isn't. Did you reduce the splash damage or the splash radius, and will this affect all missile types?
#25
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:49 PM
One day we'll get LRM's all nice and balanced.
I hope this re/un/de-nerf doesnt impact LRMs too much...
Otherwise it's back to a Battletech universe where LRMs are never seen.... Couple that with pop-tarts and it's quite unlike what Battletech has been for the past 30 years...
J2L
Edited by Johnny Two Legs, 23 May 2013 - 07:50 PM.
#26
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:53 PM
#27
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:55 PM
Paul Inouye, on 23 May 2013 - 07:37 PM, said:
The flight path change makes it so that when you have indirect firing capabilities, the missiles don't come down at 80'ish degrees. They now come down between 60-70 degrees allowing you to take cover much easier. Stay out in the open and you're still going to feel the pain.
How is this going to impact SRMs?
#28
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:56 PM
Awaiting Patch.
#29
Posted 23 May 2013 - 07:59 PM
Thank you.
#30
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:04 PM
#31
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:03 PM
#32
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:05 PM
Edited by Niko Snow, 23 May 2013 - 08:27 PM.
Image redacted for naughty language (also, improper use of the Ducreux meme
#33
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:15 PM
#34
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:26 PM
#35
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:26 PM
Edited by Avi8tor, 23 May 2013 - 08:26 PM.
#36
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:29 PM
#37
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:40 PM
#38
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:42 PM
#39
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:42 PM
#40
Posted 23 May 2013 - 08:47 PM
Besides, in a universe with lightning cannons, miniaturized rail guns, fusion reactors, its not far fetched to imagine missiles with top down angle of attack, since we have that today...
51 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 51 guests, 0 anonymous users