Jump to content

6/11 Announced Changes - Terrible


16 replies to this topic

Poll: Are the announced Alpha-nerf updates - Terrible (10 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you agree with their announced changes?

  1. No, they are absolutely terrible. (8 votes [80.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 80.00%

  2. Yes, I haven't really read them. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. What was the question? (2 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

Vote

#1 HarmAssassin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • LocationMadison, WI, USA

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:13 PM

http://mwomercs.com/...14#entry2442114

Wow... just have one word to summarize their announced changes for the upcoming 6/18 patch.

NO

Edited by HarmAssassin, 11 June 2013 - 03:22 PM.


#2 Homeless Bill

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 1,968 posts
  • LocationA Box Near You

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:17 PM

This definitely shouldn't go in the feedback thread or anything.

#3 BootHands

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 142 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:18 PM

View PostHarmAssassin, on 11 June 2013 - 03:13 PM, said:

Wow... just have one word to summarize their announced changes for the upcoming 6/18 patch.

NO


I like the MG and flamer buff. Other than that

NO

hurting boats just for the sake of hurting boats is assy.

Edited by BootHands, 11 June 2013 - 03:19 PM.


#4 Slab Squathrust

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 244 posts
  • LocationNear Seattle, WA or Billings, MT

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:19 PM

I've always felt it is a good thing to provide a link to the comments you find so outrageous. Perhaps then people can make an informed vote.

#5 Roland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,260 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:43 PM

This thread is terrible.

#6 Livewyr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 6,733 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:47 PM

I even agree with the poll.. but simply because I can agree with the poll.. I'm not voting.

#7 CMDR Sunset Shimmer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 5,341 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationNetherlands

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:48 PM

It's not exactly hurting boats, as it's hurting the exploitation of massive boating.

They're hoping to encourage more mixed, diverse builds. Frankly I'd have tightened things up a bit, penalty for 3+ of the same weapon fired at the same time with the .5 cooldown on that.

So honestly, this is much more, relaxed than I personally feel it should be. This is a good thing for the game, not a bad thing.

#8 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:53 PM

View PostJade Kitsune, on 11 June 2013 - 03:48 PM, said:

It's not exactly hurting boats, as it's hurting the exploitation of massive boating.

They're hoping to encourage more mixed, diverse builds. Frankly I'd have tightened things up a bit, penalty for 3+ of the same weapon fired at the same time with the .5 cooldown on that.

So honestly, this is much more, relaxed than I personally feel it should be. This is a good thing for the game, not a bad thing.

Because more than 6 Medium Lasers is exploitative and 3 ERPPCs isn't.


PGI simply hates it when people boat lots of small things but is completely okay with the boating of large weapons.

Edited by FupDup, 11 June 2013 - 03:53 PM.


#9 Livewyr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 6,733 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:53 PM

Does not effect my 3PPC/1Gauss HGN build.. whatsoever.

#10 CMDR Sunset Shimmer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 5,341 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationNetherlands

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:56 PM

View PostFupDup, on 11 June 2013 - 03:53 PM, said:

Because more than 6 Medium Lasers is exploitative and 3 ERPPCs isn't.


PGI simply hates it when people boat lots of small things but is completely okay with the boating of large weapons.

View PostLivewyr, on 11 June 2013 - 03:53 PM, said:

Does not effect my 3PPC/1Gauss HGN build.. whatsoever.


And this is why I personally think the restriction is too light. the cut off on ANY weapon for "boating" should be 3+, 3 medium lasers, 3 large lasers, 3 ppc's, hell 3 LRM or SRM launchers. it doesn't matter. 3 of any weapon "Boated" is too much to be firing at the same moment and should see a Penalty. 1 or 2 is fine at a time, 3 and up is starting to push the "Abuse" barrier in my opinion.

This system needs to be more strict frankly.

#11 cyberclaw

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 60 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:56 PM

nice so its there terrible or you never read them... this poll serves no purpose

#12 EddieDaHead

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 33 posts
  • LocationHeartLand of the USA

Posted 11 June 2013 - 03:57 PM

stupid, totally bias'd poll. waste of time

#13 Slab Squathrust

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 244 posts
  • LocationNear Seattle, WA or Billings, MT

Posted 11 June 2013 - 04:02 PM

View PostLivewyr, on 11 June 2013 - 03:53 PM, said:

Does not effect my 3PPC/1Gauss HGN build.. whatsoever.


This is exactly the type of mech that should be targeted but gets away unscathed. There is absolutely no difference between this and a 4 ppc stalker. In fact this is arguably the better build because of the low heat buildup from the Gauss rifle.

Also for the people complaining about the poll, the OP did something known as poisoning the well. No matter which response you pick he wins. Either you agree with him, or you admit you didn't read the proposed changes but agree with them which would be impossible.

#14 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 11 June 2013 - 04:03 PM

View PostJade Kitsune, on 11 June 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

And this is why I personally think the restriction is too light. the cut off on ANY weapon for "boating" should be 3+, 3 medium lasers, 3 large lasers, 3 ppc's, hell 3 LRM or SRM launchers. it doesn't matter. 3 of any weapon "Boated" is too much to be firing at the same moment and should see a Penalty. 1 or 2 is fine at a time, 3 and up is starting to push the "Abuse" barrier in my opinion.

This system needs to be more strict frankly.

Say whaaaaaaaaaaat?

There is nothing wrong with 4 Medium Lasers, Small Lasers, LRM 5, or anything else that's small. The only issues are with the big stuff like ERPPCs. This game poops in the mouth of small weapons enough as it is.

Edited by FupDup, 11 June 2013 - 04:04 PM.


#15 CancR

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 766 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 04:11 PM

Pgi: balancing Mechwarrior like it's call of duty.

#16 Xyroc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 855 posts
  • LocationFighting the Clan Invasion

Posted 11 June 2013 - 04:17 PM

I see nothing wrong with this patch its giving a small penalty for some loadouts that really is needed. And at the same time it only hurts if you are Alpha striking ... so whats the issue?

#17 Trauglodyte

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,373 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 04:18 PM

View PostFupDup, on 11 June 2013 - 04:03 PM, said:

Say whaaaaaaaaaaat?

There is nothing wrong with 4 Medium Lasers, Small Lasers, LRM 5, or anything else that's small. The only issues are with the big stuff like ERPPCs. This game poops in the mouth of small weapons enough as it is.


Technically, that's not right. It is only acceptable in the Mech Warrior universe as very few mechs (ie, the 3025 variants that we have and their 3050 upgrades) actually mount more than 4 of anything. Boating only became prevalent in later TRO releases and it is only common here because 1) past games allowed it to happen and 2) PGI made it possible for everyone and their brother to drop in FF, ES, and XL engines giving you a mass amount of tonnage available to mount mass amounts of weapons on top of giving every mech a mass amount of hard points upon which to utilize that available tonnage.





6 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users