352 replies to this topic

[Vassago Rain]

I see the first quickdraw was born with spider syndrome.

RIP, quickdraw #1.

[wDraco]

why messing around with pulse lasers?
Why is the PPC doing less heat than a Large Laser? thats a problem!!!

[xengk]

Garth Erlam, on 18 June 2013 - 08:24 AM, said:

Pulse Laser Normalization (See Command Chair post on this).

- The MechWarrior® Online™ Team

[Deathlike]

PEEFsmash, on 18 June 2013 - 09:16 AM, said:

Oh, phew, at least they nerfed Large Pulse Lasers. All those Large Pulse Laser boats were ruining everything!

The most I've ever boated with LPL was like 2, when I was trying different builds for the BJ-3.

Now, the decision is easy. More LPLs PPCs for me!

[Homeless Bill]

New 'mech, nerf large pulse laser, buff small pulse laser, don't do any of the things you said you were going to do in this patch (SSRMs, Seismic, jumpjet screen shake)?

So worried that all the features I care about are just vaporware...

Edit: As much as I'd love to hear "a fix is coming next patch," there is nothing more irritating than being lied to. Please, if you're not sure it's going to make the patch, don't get our hopes up.

And for the love of god, BUFF SRMS ALREADY!

Edited by Homeless Bill, 18 June 2013 - 09:27 AM.

[InRev]

Deathlike, on 18 June 2013 - 09:02 AM, said:

A simple question... WHY?

They wanted to go in a different direction with the FPS Meter meta. They feel the current change puts the FPS Meter meta more in line with their vision. It will be outlined in a Command Chair post Soon™

[Kunae]

Homeless Bill, on 18 June 2013 - 09:22 AM, said:

New 'mech, nerf large pulse laser, buff small pulse laser, don't do any of the things you said you were going to do in this patch?

So worried that all the features I care about are just vaporware...

As the comedy continues, this whole game is going to be that.

[sgt scout]

Well i know not every one is affected by the jj shake but i also now a fair percentage are. For one month youve known this yet you choose to look the other way ?
I have a founders jenner C1 cat(f) and i bought a heavy metal. You have restricted the mechs i and others can play with for a long time.

This is bad, even for you guys i did not forsee you ignoring this.

[Wieland]

Garth Erlam, on 18 June 2013 - 08:24 AM, said:

Made more improvements to the bandwidth costs.

I hope that finally fixes the ping problem that was introduced a month ago.

[Deathlike]

InRev, on 18 June 2013 - 09:22 AM, said:

They wanted to go in a different direction with the FPS Meter meta. They feel the current change puts the FPS Meter meta more in line with their vision. It will be outlined in a Command Chair post Soon™

Hah.

It's more like if you know your own FPS, any reduction in performance would go unnoticed. It's a brilliant nerf! That's how you "fix" low FPS machines.

[Kattspya]

That temporary SRM fix is getting less temporary each passing month. I need mechbays and would like to give you money but the horrible inability to fix SRM's or brawling in general makes that impossible. Flamers and MG's have never been viable and why those take priority over SRM's is beyond me.


At this point my patience is more or less ******. Fix the ******* game or show some sort of intention of fixing it. Maybe comment on why promised changes aren't happening. For example: "All of our programmers have forgotten how to edit numerical values in a XML-file so there won't be any fixing of SRM's this century."

Fail patch. Fail PGI. No money.

[Butane9000]

Tennex, on 18 June 2013 - 08:30 AM, said:

Nobody used the LPL before the heat change. a increase of 1 heat will make it even less desirable.

What is a point of a normalization pass if, in order to balance it you have to break your normalization anyways.

if you are just trying to find the right normalization curve, you can do that internally. don't need to give us unbalanced stuff in the process

Not true. I used LPL on one of my Highlander brawler builds.

[TrueBorn1]

PEEFsmash, on 18 June 2013 - 09:16 AM, said:

Where the hell is the streak nerf that was promised to be implemented "in the first patch of June"?
http://mwomercs.com/...vs-38-answered/ "This tuning adjustment will go live in the first patch of June."

Where the hell is the SRM buff?

Where the hell is the Seismic nerf?

Where the hell is the reduced JJ shake/shake based on weight class?

Where the hell is the hit-detection fix?

Oh, phew, at least they nerfed Large Pulse Lasers. All those Large Pulse Laser boats were ruining everything!

dont cry, pgi return close combat in game, refit our atlas to mg & flamer srm.... srm not need in ppcstalker online

[Deathlike]

sgt scout, on 18 June 2013 - 09:23 AM, said:

Well i know not every one is affected by the jj shake but i also now a fair percentage are. For one month youve known this yet you choose to look the other way ?
I have a founders jenner C1 cat(f) and i bought a heavy metal. You have restricted the mechs i and others can play with for a long time.

This is bad, even for you guys i did not forsee you ignoring this.

Ignorance is bliss.

Wieland, on 18 June 2013 - 09:24 AM, said:

I hope that finally fixes the ping problem that was introduced a month ago.

I'd believe it when I see it.

[Kunae]

sgt scout, on 18 June 2013 - 09:23 AM, said:

Well i know not every one is affected by the jj shake but i also now a fair percentage are. For one month youve known this yet you choose to look the other way ?
I have a founders jenner C1 cat(f) and i bought a heavy metal. You have restricted the mechs i and others can play with for a long time.

This is bad, even for you guys i did not forsee you ignoring this.

On the bright side, you've noticed something they're really good at!

Ignoring important issues, if you didn't get that.

[PropagandaWar]

Is it month 2 or 3 where we still nothing for SRM's? Sure you have your long range sniping alpha builds working no problem. SRM HSR is not really function and to top it off I get way less punch for what It cost to equip it. Hunchy SP Brawler, Cent Brawlers out of the question? What because of a SRM cat that may get close and hit something hard? Most of us just asked for a increase to 2.0 damage per missile.

*SRM6 Sucks: 3 tons 9 damage if they all hit (rarely do). Don't give me the splash nonsense you said you reduced the poop out of it. They Require ammo and have a very short effective.

Compared to:
*3 medium lasers 15 damage, 3 tons just point shoot and follow. Uh oh but the heats higher. Fine 2 Med lasers still more damage less heat
*LRM Yeah they got a buff working good can shoot over a mountain Woot
*Streaks lock and let em go
*ERPPC's Oh yeah the pride and joy of any sniper hit you from 1000 k away or in your face and smile woot.
*Gauss 15 tons 15 damage can hit in your face or 2000 away.
*AC 5 nice reload time it moves up
*4x+ AC2 Macro. Yeah they don't do damage. Look at the range! o_O
C'mon you everything else dialed in give the SRMS zero splash and minimum 2 points of damage.

[Kunae]

Deathlike, on 18 June 2013 - 09:24 AM, said:

Hah.

It's more like if you know your own FPS, any reduction in performance would go unnoticed. It's a brilliant nerf! That's how you "fix" low FPS machines.

Lol.

You sir, have won at "internets".

[MajorChunks]

It was stated that the ping issues and hit detection were related. The ping fixes in this patch should help with hit detection, since the ping spikes were messing up HSR calculations.

Edit: in here

Edited by MajorChunks, 18 June 2013 - 09:30 AM.

[hammerreborn]

Quote

Which reminds me of a joke. If a tree falls in a forest... you must not be playing MWO.

I loled. Then shot a street light.

[M4NTiC0R3X]

Homeless Bill, on 18 June 2013 - 09:22 AM, said:

So worried that all the features I care about are just vaporware...