Jump to content

Another Issue From The Past: Unrestricted Engine Assaults - Coming Soon!


102 replies to this topic

Poll: Will introducing 380+ XL Assaults dominate the field? (104 member(s) have cast votes)

Will the engine unrestricted assault be a good idea?

  1. Yes (53 votes [50.96%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.96%

  2. No (28 votes [26.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.92%

  3. They need drawbacks! (17 votes [16.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.35%

  4. Other (Explain) (6 votes [5.77%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.77%

If you were in closed beta, is this deja vu to the unrestricted engine Awesome SRM hordes?

  1. Yes (25 votes [24.04%])

    Percentage of vote: 24.04%

  2. No (50 votes [48.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 48.08%

  3. Wasn't in Closed Beta at that time (29 votes [27.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.88%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#101 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:03 PM

View Postaniviron, on 08 July 2013 - 03:07 PM, said:

I run a 380XL AWS-9M pretty regularly, and I have to say, the thing is alarmingly fragile. It's got 464 armor, but that melts pretty fast when someone puts two and two together and says "Hey that 80 ton machine is doing almost 90kph, let's shoot it in the side." Running an engine that large also means making some tradeoffs. The two best loadouts I have found for it are 3xPPC 3xSSRM2 or 3xLLAS 2xSRM4 SRM6. While they were both much better when SRMs did damage instead of firing off party favors at your opponent, they were hardly OP. I'm willing to wait and see if I eat my words and it turns out that the only things keeping the 9M in check are its terrible hitboxes and questionable hardpoints, but while those are serious drawbacks, the big engine really is a "shoot here" sign on your side torso as an assault, which good opponents will take advantage of every time. The only thing that really does concern me about very large engines being OP is the fact that you can stuff 15-18 crits worth of double heatsinks into them at no extra cost.


If an Awesome player thinks it is fragile with XL, then what chance do XL Battlemaster have when it has even larger side torso than the Awesome?

#102 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:11 PM

View PostEl Bandito, on 08 July 2013 - 07:03 PM, said:


If an Awesome player thinks it is fragile with XL, then what chance do XL Battlemaster have when it has even larger side torso than the Awesome?

I was thinking the T-boolt had a more Awesome build than the Battlemaster. That could just by my Sexy glasses though!

#103 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 08 July 2013 - 07:13 PM

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 08 July 2013 - 07:11 PM, said:

I was thinking the T-boolt had a more Awesome build than the Battlemaster. That could just by my Sexy glasses though!

Yeah, the T-Bolt does definitely copy some of the Awesome's stature, mainly the legs. The Battlemaster copies from the Atlas's legs instead.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users