Jump to content

"you Won't Have Any Advantage With 3Pv"


123 replies to this topic

Poll: Wow, that screenshot makes me feel (318 member(s) have cast votes)

Does this Atlas recieve an adavantage thanks to 3PV?

  1. yes (270 votes [84.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 84.91%

  2. no (48 votes [15.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.09%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#121 Appogee

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 10,967 posts
  • LocationOn planet Tukayyid, celebrating victory

Posted 23 August 2013 - 11:39 PM

View PostHuge, on 20 August 2013 - 11:41 PM, said:

Posted Image



''It's not just about running to a point. You have to disable or take over a portion of the base.''
''...destructible turrets ... controls modules for your Mech...''
''Dropships will be falling into MWO''

Where can I buy this game...?

#122 John MatriX82

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,398 posts
  • LocationItaly

Posted 24 August 2013 - 01:30 AM

Hassle free scouting in 12 vs 12 (jenner behind white building near the antenna slightly upleft from my crosshair):
Posted Image
Then it's not an advantage.. 3PV must be confined to pug matches with separate queues. Full stop.

Given the amount of time PGI has expended to deliver this useless, adversed and badly implmented feature, everyone of you should be NOT AMUSED by the choice instead of defending it.

It fails at teaching newbs leg positioning (with several mechs you don't even see the legs at all) it destroys team SA because you miss the minimap, seismic sensors and whatsoever.

It greatly delivers to anger the core of the community that adversed 3PV since it's first "venting" of the possibility of having it in-game, yet PGI devolved time and resources that could have been diverted towards UI 2.0 a damn interactive tutorial for the newcomers, CW or whatever else that could be more useful for the poor state of the game.

Edited by John MatriX82, 24 August 2013 - 01:33 AM.


#123 Vermaxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 3,012 posts
  • LocationBuenos Aires

Posted 24 August 2013 - 03:33 AM

I want a list. An HONEST-TO-GOD, totally legitimate list.

If you gave PGI a SINGLE CENT, and did not get a refund, you go in the "bads" category.

3PV is not a problem, it is a symptom. The problem is F2P. The problem is monetization. The problem is that MWO makes too much money for PGI to really give a rat's arse what anyone thinks because all the "bads" keep buying new hero mechs, new paint, new camos, Project Phoenix, and every other gorram thing PGI sells you.

Stop supporting the game. Stop buying into 'good packages' in the hopes the game might get better. The game is not getting better, stop rewarding them.

And, yes, in case you were wondering, I am $60 dollars in to the "bads" part of the list, which I suspect contains MOST OF THE PLAYERBASE. The ONLY thing I can do from here out is refuse to buy more, regardless of how good a deal it is.

#124 TANTE EMMA

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 531 posts
  • LocationTANTE EMMAS LADEN

Posted 24 August 2013 - 04:03 AM

I am in the "bads" as well....but as stated before, I will not dump a single cent into this game at this point of time and I will for sure not encourage anyone to do so...I am just so happy, that I did resist to buy into the Phoenix-Pack...the mechs look shiny, but honestly, why should I support a company, that just failed to prove that they are able to deliver???





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users