SteelPaladin, on 29 August 2013 - 07:25 AM, said:
It's not strictly true that there are no legal ramifications. The Crusher Joe and Dougram studios never sued; removing those was a precaution. Harmony Gold did and, barring some kind of prior contract, there is nothing preventing them from suing again.
It's likely they'd lose in court (since MWO art is different enough to probably win a copyright claim even on BT-owned TRO art), but that's already damage done. In most cases, getting the losing party to pay the winner's legal costs requires a finding that the loser acted in "bad faith," which is a very high bar to reach in the American legal system unless they managed to **** off the judge. Even if PGI could get HG to foot their bill after a loss, they would have had to front that money from the beginning of the suit until they could collect, which could be a lot of money effectively flushed for a long time with the way the American legal system works.
They'd be redesigned anyway. The MWO art style and the Macross art style are incompatible to begin with. With HG's record, it's more like they say no unless you give them licensing fees they're not entitled to because the art is different, but they'll sue you anyway and tie you up in court for ages bleeding money if they don't get it.
The bleeding goes both ways. And from what I can tell, HG is no longer in any shape to keep up that battle either, what with their claims against Hasbro, the Japanese government saying that HG has no right to control the Macross IP anyway, and HG's misadventures in the
real estate market (yes those are the same people), and their CEO's recent sentencing of
tax fraud. They will kill themselves if they try to make a claim they can't support. So I say bring it.