

Orion Ct
#1
Posted 17 September 2013 - 11:48 AM
I think its a Kintaro 2.0.
#2
Posted 17 September 2013 - 12:13 PM
Budor, on 17 September 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:
I think its a Kintaro 2.0.
I have had Orions for weeks its really no worse then a chataphact. People aim for the core so most shots land there.
Edited by SirSmokes, 17 September 2013 - 12:25 PM.
#4
Posted 17 September 2013 - 01:53 PM
Also, CTF's CT feels not so big.
#5
Posted 17 September 2013 - 02:09 PM
EDIT2: http://mwomercs.com/...xes-the-return/
Edited by Carrioncrows, 18 September 2013 - 11:09 PM.
#6
Posted 17 September 2013 - 02:13 PM
SirSmokes, on 17 September 2013 - 12:13 PM, said:
I find it close to the Catapult, without the advantage of shorter height. It's not Awesome or Kintaro bad, but it's pretty much impossible to protect it. On the plus side, runs an XL like a boss, pretty much have never lost a ST.
#7
Posted 17 September 2013 - 02:16 PM
Not sure if the Developer's realize this odd way of balancing CT hitboxes or these things get missed during their internal tests.
#8
Posted 17 September 2013 - 02:29 PM
Have done quite well with them after I stopped trying to brawl with them. I'm used to Catapults though, and they're pretty bad with their CTs.
Also, I have managed to torso twist with an XL down to 11% health. And had one arm with lasers until the end. Maybe my opponents were just bad.

Edited by Kyynele, 17 September 2013 - 02:32 PM.
#9
Posted 17 September 2013 - 02:31 PM
#10
Posted 17 September 2013 - 10:25 PM
Yes, it has a big Torso.
Yes, it is kinda slow and easy to hit.
But no matter to where I torso twist, most of the damage still goes CT.
All matches where I died were CT. Never lost an arm, leg, ST, or else.
Only CT ....
Well at least it makes one wonder if there might be an issue with the boxes.
I guess we will find out.
If there is, it will be sorted out like it was for the Kintaro.
If there isn´t ... well ... Training Training Training ....
Cheers,
Naginata
#11
Posted 17 September 2013 - 10:31 PM
#12
Posted 17 September 2013 - 11:29 PM
I don't see it as a game breaking flaw for the Orion. In fact my K model Orion with an AC-20 is my best mech right now.
#13
Posted 17 September 2013 - 11:32 PM
#14
Posted 17 September 2013 - 11:36 PM
Johnny Reb, on 17 September 2013 - 11:32 PM, said:
sure, I can use them as support mechs.
Just tired of mechs not designed as support mechs, like the Awesome or the Orion being stuck in it. Would rather have a smaller CT, and not be able to run XL. I can do good in them, but certainly have zero reason to choose one over my Victors, which are superior in every aspect except to the amoun t of missiles the VA can carry. (VA can make a very good LRM boat)
#15
Posted 17 September 2013 - 11:41 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 17 September 2013 - 11:36 PM, said:
Just tired of mechs not designed as support mechs, like the Awesome or the Orion being stuck in it. Would rather have a smaller CT, and not be able to run XL. I can do good in them, but certainly have zero reason to choose one over my Victors, which are superior in every aspect except to the amoun t of missiles the VA can carry. (VA can make a very good LRM boat)
Hey, Don't get me wrong. I would like the K and the chassis overall, to be able to brawl. I just wanted a heavy class lrm boat "that can do actually do lrm right" and am happy with the Orion as that!
edit: In my lrm builds die from side, actually getting into the mix always ct.
Edited by Johnny Reb, 17 September 2013 - 11:44 PM.
#16
Posted 17 September 2013 - 11:42 PM
I don't go around looking for a brawl, but instead, support surges when it happens. My original ballistic armament used to be a Gauss, then AC20, and finally 2 UAC5. The two UAC5 are clustered close in the torso (Protector), which means their fire isn't dispersed, It feels more devastating than twin UAC5s on a Jager.
However the torso mounted ballistics means you can't fit an AC20 or 2 UAC5 with an XL engine.
I used to pack a Gauss with the XL engine, like the stock Protector. That's actually pretty dangerous if you get hit on the side torso.
#17
Posted 17 September 2013 - 11:47 PM
edit: still basic-ed all 3 in one night! Premium time and multi first win for the night bonus.
Edited by Johnny Reb, 17 September 2013 - 11:49 PM.
#18
Posted 18 September 2013 - 12:22 AM
I stopped playing Catapults for similar reasons.
#19
Posted 18 September 2013 - 01:00 AM
#20
Posted 18 September 2013 - 01:39 AM
Ibericvs, on 18 September 2013 - 01:00 AM, said:
they are actually better off with an XL. They are fragile, but their side torsos seldom get cored, but having speed from an XL (they love 350XLs) helps a lot.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users