


Did We Leave Beta Too Soon?
#1
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:02 PM

#2
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:07 PM
#3
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:09 PM
#4
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:09 PM
Edited by Purlana, 05 November 2013 - 12:10 PM.
#5
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:15 PM
#6
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:17 PM
Can we all agree to start playing the game we have instead of crying for the countless different ersatz games each of us carries around in our head and just knows would be better than this?
Can we stop asking questions that have no constructive point?
Edited by Tycho von Gagern, 05 November 2013 - 12:19 PM.
#7
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:21 PM
Joseph Mallan, on 05 November 2013 - 12:07 PM, said:
QFT.
Had we stayed in CB another 6 months, I think we would have been in better shape. At least then, people were actually TESTING the game, not just playing in to get a "Leg up" on launch.
Probably would still have a Gen Desc (for those of you who actually MISS it) had the mouth-breathers not been let in the game so soon.
#8
Posted 05 November 2013 - 12:28 PM
Roadbeer, on 05 November 2013 - 12:21 PM, said:
QFT.
Had we stayed in CB another 6 months, I think we would have been in better shape. At least then, people were actually TESTING the game, not just playing in to get a "Leg up" on launch.
Probably would still have a Gen Desc (for those of you who actually MISS it) had the mouth-breathers not been let in the game so soon.
When I close my mouth I turn blue

#9
Posted 05 November 2013 - 02:08 PM
#10
Posted 05 November 2013 - 02:21 PM
I hadn't noticed.
#11
Posted 05 November 2013 - 03:28 PM
#12
Posted 05 November 2013 - 03:51 PM
#13
Posted 05 November 2013 - 04:02 PM
Quote
Its so the OP can have a number of people agree with him so he can feel better about his own opinion.

He's not wrong though, I would have liked to stay in beta until CW or at least UI 2.0.
#14
Posted 05 November 2013 - 04:06 PM
Animal Crackers, on 05 November 2013 - 12:02 PM, said:

Okay my problem w/this post is this >>> Member Since09-July 13. How can you possibly state that you have not seen a difference in game since beta started when you joined only 3 months ago?
#15
Posted 05 November 2013 - 04:07 PM
Guchion, on 05 November 2013 - 04:02 PM, said:
Its so the OP can have a number of people agree with him so he can feel better about his own opinion.

He's not wrong though, I would have liked to stay in beta until CW or at least UI 2.0.
completely irrelevant. beta has come and gone so again wtf? OP fail is OP fail
xMEPHISTOx, on 05 November 2013 - 04:06 PM, said:
yea I pointed that out too. No answer of course. This entire thread is just dumb
#16
Posted 05 November 2013 - 04:21 PM
Obviously OP was not here when all we had was one map (forest colony), or when LRM's melted people, and when streak cats were the scourge...basically a post based on his 1 month of playing in OB just prior to the 'release' as this game has changed dramatically since CB.
Edited by xMEPHISTOx, 05 November 2013 - 04:22 PM.
#17
Posted 05 November 2013 - 04:52 PM
#18
Posted 05 November 2013 - 08:01 PM
We left closed BETA too soon.
We left open BETA too soon.
We Launched too soon.
Lots of new mechs, a few new maps, one new game mode. But we still don't have the one thing we all really want, which is CW. That was the selling point of the game, at least to me. And unfortunately it looks like we are still very far from that. In fact, I heard from people who played with UI2.0 in the test server that it feels very unfinished and is very un-intuitive. Not a very good review for something they have been working on for so long and have been showcasing.
#19
Posted 05 November 2013 - 08:05 PM
Also to have mech screens still displaying [No-Signal, AutoDetect] must look super unfinished to new players.
#20
Posted 05 November 2013 - 08:09 PM
Roadbeer, on 05 November 2013 - 12:21 PM, said:
Oh, c'mon! If they hadn't let the mouth-breathers in, we'd still be waiting for CLOSED beta to start. Hell, we'd be waiting on the in-house testing....

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users