#961
Posted 28 November 2014 - 03:49 PM
#962
Posted 29 November 2014 - 01:48 AM
#963
Posted 29 November 2014 - 06:10 AM
Since it cost pgi money to make these changes, and most folk agree the old version looks better, have pgi explained why they did this?
#964
Posted 29 November 2014 - 06:45 AM
#965
Posted 29 November 2014 - 11:28 AM
#966
Posted 29 November 2014 - 01:54 PM
F4T 4L, on 29 November 2014 - 06:10 AM, said:
Since it cost pgi money to make these changes, and most folk agree the old version looks better, have pgi explained why they did this?
nope, barely a mention that it will go though another fix eventually...
#967
Posted 29 November 2014 - 02:07 PM
MATRAKA14, on 26 November 2014 - 11:49 PM, said:
How about one with badly (on purpose) photochopped (misspelled on purpose too) dumbo ears?
I see absolutely no reason why they cannot revert the ORIGINAL box sizes (and yes, there were two different ones) and use the dynamic placement we've seen on EVERY OTHER IS MECH, most notably the Centurion.
#968
Posted 04 December 2014 - 07:41 PM
cdlord, on 29 November 2014 - 02:07 PM, said:
I see absolutely no reason why they cannot revert the ORIGINAL box sizes (and yes, there were two different ones) and use the dynamic placement we've seen on EVERY OTHER IS MECH, most notably the Centurion.
My guess? The ARTard who did this is a mad bad who hates LRM's.
#969
Posted 04 December 2014 - 07:56 PM
#970
Posted 04 December 2014 - 07:59 PM
Prezimonto, on 04 December 2014 - 07:56 PM, said:
We need every single last person who has posted here in agreement to use the signatures - if everyone here did that they really wouldn't be able to ignore it anymore.
#971
Posted 04 December 2014 - 08:02 PM
#972
Posted 04 December 2014 - 08:10 PM
Quote
1. Gigggity...............
Yep, thats all.
#973
Posted 05 December 2014 - 01:25 AM
#974
Posted 05 December 2014 - 04:16 AM
That says alot about how much people dislike the Geometry changes
#976
Posted 05 December 2014 - 04:54 AM
#977
Posted 05 December 2014 - 05:55 AM
Captain Stiffy, on 05 December 2014 - 01:25 AM, said:
No, no you are not.....
#978
Posted 05 December 2014 - 08:41 AM
#979
Posted 05 December 2014 - 12:23 PM
#980
Posted 05 December 2014 - 12:35 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users